Analisis Manajemen Risiko Usaha Ayam Broiler Bapak M. Yusuf di Kabupaten Dharmasraya Ditinjau dari Manajemen Bisnis Syariah Analysis of Risk Management in Mr. M. Yusuf's Broiler Chicken Business in Dharmasraya Regency in Terms of Sharia Business Management
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1432-1447
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/arzusin.v6i2.9540
Viewed: 64 times
Downloaded: 63 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Seni Syaftela.Z1*, Harfandi Harfandi2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although research on risk management in broiler chicken businesses has developed, studies that specifically integrate risk management with the perspective of Sharia business management in smallholder poultry farming remain limited. This study aims to analyze risk management in Mr. M. Yusuf’s broiler chicken business in Dharmasraya Regency and to review its implementation from the perspective of Sharia business management. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving five informants selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation, and were then analyzed using the descriptive qualitative analysis technique of the Miles and Huberman model. The results showed that the broiler chicken business faced four main types of risk, namely production risk, price and market risk, financial risk, and operational risk. Among these four risks, production risk was the most dominant factor, as indicated by the high chicken mortality rate and inconsistent growth. These findings contribute to the development of Sharia-based risk management studies while broadening understanding of risk management in the smallholder livestock sector. This study concludes that systematic risk management integrated with the perspective of Sharia business management is important for supporting business sustainability, so business actors need to improve production management, financial recordkeeping, and operational efficiency. The implications of this study include theoretical contributions to the development of the Sharia risk management literature and practical contributions for business actors and policymakers in the agribusiness sector, while also opening opportunities for further research on the development of more comprehensive Sharia-based risk management models.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208932
Antonio, M. S. (2019). Bank Syariah: Dari Teori ke Praktik (Edisi revisi). Gema Insani.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dusuki, A. W. (2008). Understanding the objectives of Islamic banking: A survey of stakeholders’ perspectives. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 1(2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538390810880982
FAO. (2022). Poultry sector Indonesia: Review and outlook. https://www.fao.org
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Griffin, R. W. (2021). Management (13th ed.). Cengage.
Hillson, D., & Simon, P. (2020). Practical project risk management: The ATOM methodology (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of risk management: Understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management (5th ed.). Kogan Page.
Ismail, M., Rahman, A., & Yusuf, S. (2019). Risk factors in broiler chicken farming and supply chain management. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 53(3), 233–240.
ISO. (2018). ISO 31000: Risk management—Guidelines. https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html
Karim, A. A. (2021). Ekonomi Mikro Islam (Edisi revisi). RajaGrafindo Persada.
Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. (2023). Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan 2023. https://ditjenpkh.pertanian.go.id
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Lam, J. (2014). Enterprise risk management: From incentives to controls (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Muniroh, S. (2024). Analisis Manajemen Risiko Usaha Ayam Broiler pada Peternakan Rakyat. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 12(1), 45–56.
Muthmainnah, S., & Habibaturridhah, N. (2025). Manajemen Risiko Berbasis Syariah pada Pasar Tradisional. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 10(2), 120–135.
Obaidullah, M. (2017). Islamic financial services. Islamic Economics Research Center.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Ramadhan, R., Sari, D., & Putra, A. (2018). Analisis Risiko Produksi Usaha Ayam Broiler di Indonesia. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia, 20(2), 85–92.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2020). Management (15th ed.). Pearson.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Solihat, N., Hidayat, T., & Rahman, F. (2023). Evaluasi Manajemen Risiko Usaha Peternakan Ayam Broiler. Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis, 11(1), 77–89.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Yanti, R. (2020). Analisis Faktor Risiko dalam Usaha Ayam Broiler. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan, 18(1), 33–40.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.