Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Financial distress is an important concern in financial studies because it can be used as an early indicator of a company’s potential bankruptcy. However, studies that specifically compare the effects of financial ratios on financial distress prediction using the Grover, Ohlson, and Zavgren models in pharmaceutical companies in Indonesia remain limited. This study aims to analyze the effects of Return on Assets (ROA), Current Ratio (CR), Debt to Asset Ratio (DAR), and Total Asset Turnover (TATO) on financial distress prediction in pharmaceutical companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2020–2024 period. This study used a quantitative approach with a causal design. The research sample consisted of 10 pharmaceutical companies selected through purposive sampling. Data were obtained from companies’ annual financial statements through the documentation method and analyzed using multiple linear regression with the assistance of EViews 13. The results showed that ROA and TATO had significant effects on financial distress prediction in the Grover, Ohlson, and Zavgren models. CR had a significant effect in the Grover and Zavgren models but was not significant in the Ohlson model, whereas DAR had a significant effect only in the Grover model. Simultaneously, ROA, CR, DAR, and TATO had significant effects on financial distress prediction in all three models. In addition, the Grover and Zavgren models demonstrated higher predictive ability than the Ohlson model. These findings contribute to the development of Agency Theory and Signaling Theory in explaining the relationship between financial ratios and financial distress. The practical implications of this study can serve as a basis for consideration by investors, creditors, company management, and regulators in identifying financial distress risk at an earlier stage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Wu X. (2027)
    Unconditionally positivity-preserving explicit order-one strong approximations of financial SDEs with non-Lipschitz coefficients
    Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 491
  2. Henni M.D. (2027)
    Renewable electricity penetration and retail price dynamics: Global evidence on transitional costs of the energy transition
    Unconventional Resources, 16
  3. Palma-Lopez M. (2027)
    Urine culture contamination in a tertiary hospital: Demographic predictors and direct economic impact
    Clinica Chimica Acta, 593

Article Details

How to Cite
Tiara, Z., & Devy, T. (2026). Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan terhadap Prediksi Financial Distress dengan Model Grover, Ohlson, dan Zavgren pada Perusahaan Farmasi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Periode 2020-2024. ARZUSIN, 6(4), 3723-3746. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v6i4.10365

References

Ananda. (2024). Pengaruh tata kelola perusahaan terhadap risiko financial distress pada perusahaan publik di Indonesia.

Arikunto, S. (2021). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi revisi). Rineka Cipta.

Ayem, S., Pratama, M. A., & Nugroho, R. A. (2023). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Financial Distress pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(2), 85–97.

Bernardin, D. E. Y., & Indriani, G. (2020). Financial distress: Leverage, likuiditas, aktivitas dan ukuran perusahaan dimoderasi profitabilitas. Financia: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 1(1), 38–49.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Damayanti, D. P., & Widati, L. W. (2024). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Financial Distress (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Sektor Industri Barang Konsumsi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2020–2022). KOMPAK: Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 17(1), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.51903/kompak.v17i1.1705

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149

Fungjin, S. (2020). Corporate governance, ownership structure, and financial distress prediction.

Gama, A. W. S., Putra, I. G. C., & Dewi, N. P. S. (2024). Agency theory and financial distress: The role of managerial decision making in corporate financial performance.

Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 26 (10th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kudus, A., & Meidiyustiani, R. (2022). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Financial Distress pada Perusahaan Sektor Properti dan Real Estate yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomika dan Manajemen, 11(2), 151–165.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Oktaviani, D. (2024). Analisis financial distress pada perusahaan farmasi pascapandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

Purwaningsih, E., & Safitri, I. (2022). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Leverage, Rasio Arus Kas dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Financial Distress. JAE: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomi, 7(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.29407/jae.v7i2.17707

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley.

Septia, N. (2025). Analisis financial distress dan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya pada perusahaan publik di Indonesia.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Syifa, N., & Idawati, W. (2024). Pengaruh corporate governance dan opini audit going concern terhadap prediksi financial distress.

Utami, T., Rahmawati, I. Y., Bagis, F., & Utami, R. F. (2023). Unravelling financial distress: The impact of profitability, leverage, liquidity, operating capacity and company size. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 23(24), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2023/v23i241195