Naskh dalam Sunnah dan Implikasinya terhadap Hukum dan Tafsir Al-Qur'an Naskh in the Sunnah and Its Implications for Law and Qur’anic Exegesis
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
46-63
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/anwarul.v6i1.8704
Viewed: 19 times
Downloaded: 10 times
We cordially invite qualified professionals to join LYAS Publisher as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will play a vital role in maintaining and enhancing the quality of our publications. If you are interested, please complete the following form: Editors & Reviewers
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any further information regarding the submission process or have additional questions.
Authors:
Muhammad Abbas1* 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the concept of nashk (nasakh) has been a topic of inquiry in Islamic jurisprudence, research that specifically examines its implications within the Sunnah and its influence on Qur’anic tafsīr remains relatively limited. This study aimed to analyze the role of nashk in the Sunnah and its implications for legal determination and Qur’anic tafsīr. A qualitative approach was employed using a library study design focused on analysis of the Qur’an, hadith, and relevant classical and contemporary tafsīr works. The findings show that nashk is an important component in understanding the development of Islamic law because it reflects the flexibility and adaptive capacity of Islamic jurisprudence to changing social and historical contexts. In addition, nashk plays a significant role in Qur’anic interpretation by influencing both the evolving legal principles and the methodologies applied by scholars in understanding religious texts. This study contributes to a broader understanding of the application of nashk and offers new insights into its dynamic impact on legal theory and Qur’anic tafsīr. The study concludes that nashk is essential for maintaining the integrity of Islamic law while enabling its adjustment to contemporary challenges, and it encourages scholars to consider its implications in the context of modern legal issues and Qur’anic interpretation.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abu Zayd, N. H. (2006). Reformation of Islamic thought: A critical historical analysis. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053568859
Al-Amidi, S. al-D. (2003). Al-Ihkām fī uṣūl al-aḥkām [The perfection in the principles of legal rulings] (S. al-Jamili, Ed.). Dar al-Kitab al-Arabi.
Al-Dhahabi, M. H. (2000). Al-Tafsīr wa al-mufassirūn [Qur'anic exegesis and the exegetes]. Maktabah Wahbah.
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (2018). Principles of abrogation in Islamic jurisprudence. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 6(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.15640/jisc.v6n2a5
Al-Ghazali, A. H. (2016). Al-Mustaṣfā min 'ilm al-uṣūl [The refined in the science of legal principles] (M. al-Ashqar, Ed.). Mu'assasat al-Risalah.
Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2013). Kayfa nata'āmal ma'a al-sunnah al-nabawiyyah [How to deal with the prophetic tradition]. Dar al-Shorouk.
Al-Shafi'i, M. I. (2014). Al-Risālah [The treatise] (A. M. Shakir, Ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Al-Shatibi, A. I. (2006). Al-Muwāfaqāt fī uṣūl al-sharī'ah [The reconciliation in the principles of Islamic law] (M. Abdullah Darraz, Ed.). Dar al-Ma'rifah.
Al-Suyuti, J. al-D. (2019). Al-Itqān fī 'ulūm al-Qur'ān [Perfection in the Qur'anic sciences] (M. Abu al-Fadl Ibrahim, Ed.). Al-Hay'ah al-Misriyyah al-Ammah lil-Kitab.
Al-Zarkashi, B. al-D. (2000). Al-Baḥr al-muḥīṭ fī uṣūl al-fiqh [The encompassing ocean in legal principles]. Dar al-Kutubi.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., Williams, J. M., Bizup, J., & FitzGerald, W. T. (2016). The craft of research (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226239873.001.0001
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burton, J. (1990). The sources of Islamic law: Islamic theories of abrogation. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474472272
Clarence-Smith, W. G. (2006). Islam and the abolition of slavery. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195221510.001.0001
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
El-Awa, M. S. (2006). Punishment in Islamic law: A comparative study. American Trust Publications.
Elsevier. (2020). Mendeley reference manager: User guide. https://www.mendeley.com
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Gleave, R. (2012). Islam and literalism: Literal meaning and interpretation in Islamic legal theory. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748645558.001.0001
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Sharī'a: Theory, practice, transformations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815300
Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526441034
Ibn al-Qayyim, M. I. (2008). I'lām al-muwaqqi'īn 'an rabb al-'ālamīn [Informing the signatories about the Lord of the worlds] (M. M. al-Hamid, Ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Ibn Taymiyyah, A. (2005). Majmū' al-fatāwā [Collection of legal opinions] (A. al-Najdi, Ed.). Dar al-Wafa.
Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence (3rd ed.). Islamic Texts Society.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Mansour, A. (2021). Abrogation in Islamic law: Contemporary challenges and interpretations. Islamic Law and Society, 28(1–2), 156–189. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-bja10013
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Neuwirth, A., Sinai, N., & Marx, M. (Eds.). (2010). The Qur'an in context: Historical and literary investigations into the Qur'anic milieu. Brill.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Opwis, F. (2010). Maslaha and the purpose of the law: Islamic discourse on legal change from the 4th/10th to 8th/14th century. Brill.
Powers, D. S. (2013). Muhammad is not the father of any of your men: The making of the last prophet. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812208344
Rahman, F. (2009). Major themes of the Qur'an (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Rapley, T. (2007). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208901
Resnik, D. B. (2020). The ethics of research with human subjects: Protecting people, advancing science, promoting trust. Springer.
Rippin, A. (2017). The function of asbāb al-nuzūl in Qur'anic exegesis. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 51(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00040714
Sachedina, A. (2001). The Islamic roots of democratic pluralism. Oxford University Press.
Sadeghi, B. (2018). The chronology of the Qur'an: A stylometric research program. Arabica, 58(3–4), 210–299.
Saeed, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur'an: Towards a contemporary approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088739
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Sulaiman, M. A. (2020). Nashk in Qur'anic interpretation: Classical and modern perspectives. Journal of Qur'anic Studies, 22(3), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2020.0435
Vishanoff, D. R. (2011). The formation of Islamic hermeneutics: How Sunni legal theorists imagined a revealed law. American Schools of Oriental Research.
Zed, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan [Library research methods] (3rd ed.). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Zysow, A. (2013). The economy of certainty: An introduction to the typology of Islamic legal theory. Lockwood Press.
Find the perfect home for your research! If this journal isn't the right fit, don't worry—we offer a wide range of journals covering diverse fields of study. Explore our other journals to discover the ideal platform for your work and maximize its impact. Browse now and take the next step in publishing your research:
| HOME | Yasin | AlSys | Anwarul | Masaliq | Arzusin | Tsaqofah | Ahkam | AlDyas | Mikailalsys | Edumalsys | Alsystech | AJSTEA | AJECEE | AJISD | IJHESS | IJEMT | IJECS | MJMS | MJAEI | AMJSAI | AJBMBR | AJSTM | AJCMPR | AJMSPHR | KIJST | KIJEIT | KIJAHRS |