The Development of Theoretical Study of Social Interpretation: Social Relations

Main Article Content

Deden Mula Saputra
Agung Kurniawan

Abstract

This article explores the historical and epistemological development of social commentary (al-tafsīr adabī al-ijtimāʿī) within the Islamic scientific tradition and its relevance to addressing contemporary social issues. Grounded in the premise that the Qur'an offers comprehensive guidance for all dimensions of human life, the study traces the evolution of Qur'anic interpretation from a predominantly textual-linguistic paradigm to a more contextual and socially engaged approach. Employing a qualitative methodology within a literature study framework, the research analyzes seminal works such as Tafsir al-Manar, Fī Ẓilāl al-Qurʾān, Tafsir al-Azhar, and Tafsir al-Miṣbāḥ, alongside the intellectual contributions of scholars including Muḥammad ʿAbduh, Sayyid Quṭb, Fazlur Rahman, and M. Quraish Shihab. The study investigates the epistemological foundations of social commentary through key Islamic concepts such as maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, the principle of maṣlaḥah, and the Theory of Double Movement. It proposes a typology of social commentary comprising four interpretive orientations: reformist, revolutionary, contextual, and transformative. The findings demonstrate that social interpretation effectively integrates Qur'anic values with real-world societal contexts, offering a dynamic and responsive framework for engaging with modern challenges. As such, it serves as a viable model for fostering a just, inclusive, and ethically grounded society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Bhagyasree M.R. (2027)
    CONSUMER HEALTH ENTOMOLOGY-A FORTIORI INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE OF EMERGING PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE, WITH EMPHASIS ON ITS COMMERCIAL, BEHAVIOURAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1), 122-127
  2. Urazkeldiyeva D.A. (2027)
    Development of technology for obtaining high-purity sodium chloride with induced impurity removal and process modeling
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 342(3), 56-64
  3. Ganieva Z. (2027)
    BIOCENOTIC RELATIONSHIPS OF TERMITES OF THE GENUS ANACANTHOTERMES
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Saputra, D. M., & Kurniawan, A. (2025). The Development of Theoretical Study of Social Interpretation: Social Relations. ALSYS, 5(4), 1318-1343. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v5i4.6495

References

Abduh, M., & Ridha, R. (1947). Tafsir Al-Qur’an al-Hakim al-Mushtahar Bi Tafsir al-Manar. Mesir: Dar al-Manar.

Ahmed, A. S. (2013). Postmodernism and Islam: Predicament and promise. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413593

Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1998). Tauhid. Bandung: Pustaka.

Ali, A. Y. (1989). The Holy Qur’an: Text, translation and commentary. Amana Publications.

Ali, J. (1970). Al-Mufaṣṣal fī Tārīkh al-ʿArab Qabl al-Islām (Vols. 1–8). Beirut: Dār al-ʿIlm li al-Malāyīn.

Arkoun, M., & Lee, R. D. (2019). Rethinking Islam (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429304651

Asad, M. (1980). The Message of the Qur’ān. Gibraltar: Dar al-Andalus. https://archive.org/details/message-asad

Asy-Syatibi, A. I. I. M. B. M. al-L. (1997). Al-Muwāfaqāt fī Uṣūl al-Sharīʿah (Vols. 1–4). Saudi Arabia: Dar Ibn Affan.

Dhahabi, M. H. al-. (1976). Al-Tafsir wa Mufassirun. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. https://archive.org/details/tafsirwalmufassirundralzahabi

Engineer, A. (1990). Islam and liberation theology: Essays on liberative elements in Islam. India: Sterling Publishers.

Engineer, A. (2005). The Qurʼan, women, and modern society. India: Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd.

Esack, F. (1997). Qurʾan, liberation & pluralism: An Islamic perspective of interreligious solidarity against oppression. Oneworld. https://ixtheo.de/Record/1612419305

Fitriono, E. N. (2023). Epistemologi Syed Hossen Nasr dalam pendidikan Islam. Mau`izhah: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 12(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.55936/mau.v12i2.117

Gadamer, H. G. (1989). Truth and method. New York: Continuum.

HAMKA. (1982). Tafsir Al-Azhar (Vols. 1–30). Jakarta: Pustaka Panjimas.

Hanafi, H. (1977). Religious dialogue and revolution: Essays on Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Kairo: Anglo Egyptian Bookshop.

Hanafi, H. (1988). Min al-‘Aqidah ila al-Tsawrah. Beirut: Dar al-Tanwir.

Ibn Katsir. (1999). Tafsīr Al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Beirut: Dār Ṭayyibah li al-Nashr wa al-Tawzīʿ. https://inlislite.uin-suska.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=4941

Ibn Taimiyah, A. (1995). Muqaddimah fī Uṣūl al-Tafsīr. Beirut: Dār Maktabah al-Ḥayāh.

Iqbal, M. (1934). The reconstruction of religious thought in Islam. Lahore: Shaikh Muhammad Ashraf.

Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. UK: The Islamic Texts Society.

Kerr, M. H. (1966). Islamic reform: The political and legal theories of Muhammad ’Abduh and Rashid Rida. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Khoiri, A. (2023). Tafsir kemartiran: Studi kitab fī ẓilāl sūrah al-Taubah karya ‘Abdullāh ‘Azzām [Master’s thesis, Sekolah Pascasarjana UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/78381

Madjid, N. (2019). Islam: Doktrin & peradaban. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Maududi, A. A. (1965). Tafheem-ul-Quran. Delhi: Maktabah Jama’at Islami.

Mustaqim, A. (2020). Epistemologi tafsir kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Idea Press.

Nasr, S. H. (1972). Islamic philosophy in contemporary Persia: A survey of activity during the last two decades. New York: Kazi Publications.

Qardhawi, Y. (1994). Metode mamahami As-Sunnah dengan benar (K. Saifullah, Trans.). Jakarta: Media Da’wah.

Qutb, S. (1972). Fī Ẓilāl Al-Qurʾān (Vols. 1–6). Kairo: Dār al-Shurūq.

Qutb, S. (1979). Al-ʿAdālah al-Ijtimāʿiyyah fī al-Islām. Kairo: Dār al-Shurūq.

Rahman, F. (1979). Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rahman, F. (1980). Major themes of the Quran. Minneapolis-Chicago: Bibliotheca Islamica.

Saeed, R. A. (2014). Methāqe Madīna, a universal charter of peace: An analytical study in the modern sociopolitical context. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3609759

Sardar, Z. (1985). Islamic futures: The shape of ideas to come. London: Mansell.

Shihab, M. Q. (1992). “Membumikan” Al-Quran: Fungsi dan peran wahyu dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Bandung: Mizan.

Shihab, M. Q. (1996). Wawasan Al-Qur’an: Tafsir maudhu’i atas pelbagai persoalan umat. Bandung: Mizan.

Shihab, M. Q. (2002). Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, kesan, dan keserasian al-Qur’an (Vols. 1–15). Tangerang: Lentera Hati.

Shihab, M. Q. (2019). Kaidah tafsir. Tangerang: Lentera Hati Group.

Soroush, A. (2000). Reason, freedom, and democracy in Islam: Essential writings of Abdolkarim Soroush. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Suyuthi, J. al-. (1974). Al-Itqān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān (Vols. 1–2). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Syariati, A. (1979). On the sociology of Islam (H. Algar, Trans.). Berkeley: Mizan Press.

Tabari, M. I. J. al-. (1974). Jāmiʻ al-Bayān ʻan Taʼwīl al-Qurʼān. Mesir: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.

Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Watt, W. M. (1956). Muhammad at Medinah. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zayd, N. H. A. (1992). Naqd al-Khiṭāb al-Dīnī. Kairo: Sīnā li al-Nashr.

Zayd, N. H. A. (2014). Mafhum an-Nash: Dirasah fi Ulum al-Qur’an. Beirut: Al-Markaz al-Tsaqafi al-Arabi.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.