Hakiki and Majāzi in Islamic Legal Interpretation: Implications for Gender Issues and Women's Rights

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The growing prominence of gender equality and women’s rights in modern society has intensified debates over the interpretation of Islamic law, particularly regarding whether Qur’anic and Prophetic texts should be understood through ḥaqīqah (literal meaning) or majāz (metaphorical meaning) in response to changing social realities. This study aims to analyze the concepts of ḥaqīqah and majāz within Islamic legal theory (uṣūl al-fiqh), examine their application to texts concerning gender and women’s rights, and assess their relevance to the contemporary reformulation of Islamic law. Employing a qualitative library research approach, the study draws on classical and contemporary works on uṣūl al-fiqh, Qur’anic exegesis, hadith studies, and Islamic legal scholarship. The findings demonstrate that ḥaqīqah and majāz constitute complementary interpretive instruments in understanding Islamic legal texts. In particular, metaphorical interpretation can reveal the broader objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharīʿah) and support more context-sensitive responses to gender-related issues and women’s rights. Nevertheless, such interpretation must remain grounded in linguistic conventions, textual context, and established principles of Islamic jurisprudence to prevent arbitrary or subjective readings. The study concludes that a methodologically controlled application of ḥaqīqah and majāz can contribute to a more responsive, equitable, and contextually relevant framework of Islamic law. It further contributes to contemporary Islamic legal discourse by clarifying how classical linguistic principles may be employed to reconcile textual authority with evolving demands for gender justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Citation data unavailable
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Hasan A. (2026)
    Integrating Maqasid al-Shariah into Islamic Sustainable Banking: A Systematic Review of Halal Industry Practices and Green Economy Alignment (2020–2024)
    Banco, 8(1), 230-245
  2. Maisyarah M. (2026)
    Integrating Islamic Brand Experience and Digital Marketing Ethics to Foster Sustainable Loyalty in the Halal Coffee Industry
    Banco, 8(1), 1-14
  3. Angraini L.M. (2027)
    Integrating Computational Thinking and Islamic Values in Geometry Learning: Effects on Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 67-78

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramli, T. E., Fatmawati, & Abidin, Z. (2026). Hakiki and Majāzi in Islamic Legal Interpretation: Implications for Gender Issues and Women’s Rights. ALSYS, 6(4), 2222-2234. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v6i4.11315

References

Al-Amidi, S. (2004). Al-Ihkam fi Usul al-Ahkam (Vol. 1). Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Ghazali, A. H. (1993). Al-Mustasfa min ‘Ilm al-Usul (Vol. 1). Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Juwayni, A. al-M. (1980). Al-Burhan fi Usul al-Fiqh (Vol. 1). Dar al-Anshar.

Al-Razi, F. al-D. (1992). Al-Mahsul fi ‘Ilm Usul al-Fiqh (Vol. 1). Mu’assasat al-Risalah.

Al-Syatibi, I. ibn M. (2004). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Syari‘ah (Vol. 2). Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Anggito, A., & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. CV Jejak.

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. The International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Erianto, F., Jumadi, M., & Suryaningsi, S. (2025). Ketidaksetaraan Gender dalam Partisipasi Pengambilan Keputusan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam. Doh Gisin, 2(2), 65–74. https://e-journals2.unmul.ac.id/index.php/dohgisin/article/view/4380

Fasiha, Umar, Cahyani, R., & Nursafitri, E. (2023). Islamic law perspective on gender equality in improving family welfare. Al-Qalam, 29(2), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v29i2.1336

Fikri, H. W. (2024). Konstruksi Pemikiran Ahmad Al-Raisuni dalam Perspektif Maqashid al-Syari’ah dan Implikasinya terhadap Fiqh Politik di Indonesia. Al-‘Adalah: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Islam, 9(2), 418–432. https://e-journal.uac.ac.id/index.php/adlh/article/view/6089

Freeks, F. E. (2024). Advocating for Family Well-Being in a Transforming and Broken World. Dialogo Publishing House SRL.

Fry, A. D. J. (2019). Gender attitudes amongst Anglo-Catholic and evangelical clergy in the Church of England [Doctoral dissertation, Durham University]. https://etheses.durham.ac.uk/id/eprint/13218/

Gofar, A., Amina, S., & Fajrin, N. (2025). Rekonstruksi Konsep Maslahah Mursalah sebagai Basis Ijtihad Kontemporer dalam Menjawab Tantangan Modernitas. Tamaddun, 10(1), 10–28. https://ejournal.uluwiyah.ac.id/index.php/tamaddun/article/view/411

Hamidah, N., Aswadi, Rukhuz, M., & Syaifullah, A. (2025). Analysis rules Ḥaqīqah and majāz in interpreting the term qawwāmūna (QS. An-Nisa’ verse 34). Studia Quranika, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21111/studiaquranika.v10i1.13974

Hamidi, J. (2011). Hermeneutika Hukum: Sejarah, Filsafat, & Metode Tafsir. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Ibn ‘Ashur, M. al-T. (2001). Maqasid al-Shari‘ah al-Islamiyyah. Dar al-Nafais.

Ichsan, A. S., Samsudin, S., Pranajati, N. R., Mujawazah, M., Kurniawan, H. L., & Auzai, A. (2026). Free nutritious meals (MBG) program impact on child well-being and gender equity in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Gender and Child Studies, 5(1), 380–390. https://zia-research.com/index.php/jcgcs/article/view/540

Junaedi, D. (2018). Menafsir Teks, Memahami Konteks: Menelisik Akar Perbedaan Penafsiran terhadap Al-Qur’an. Deepublish.

Khotimah, U. K. (2025). Pendekatan Fikih dan Ushul Fikih: Kajian Sumber-Sumber Hukum Islam dan Metodologi Ijtihad. Nawa Litera Publishing.

Masyhadi. (2023). Konsep Hakikat dan Majāz dalam Kajian Ilmu Fiqh. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 10(3), 885–892. https://doi.org/10.69896/modeling.v10i3.2224

Megasari, I. D. (2024). Kesetaraan Gender dalam Perlindungan Hak Anak dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 2(3), 1577–1585. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v2i3.682

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muzammil, S. (Ed.). (2025). Qira’ah Mu’asirah Fi Al-Ahkam dalam Berbagai Perspektif. Suka Press. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/75187/

Nurcahaya, N., & Akbarizan, A. (2023). Perempuan dalam Perdebatan: Memahami Peran dan Tantangan Berpolitik dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. JAWI: Journal of Ahkam Wa Iqtishad, 1(3), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8397647

Rofiq, N. (2024). Gender, faith, and reform: A narrative review of Islamic feminism and public policy. Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijis.v2i2.600

Rosidah, G. R., Syamil, A., Hurit, R. U., Asman, A., Lestariningsih, Radjawane, L. E., Bagenda, C., Amane, N. F. P. O., Saloom, C. P. T., S, S., Fadhilatunisa, N. B. G., & Fakhri, M. M. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan Kombinasi (S. Bahri, Ed.). CV Media Sains Indonesia.

Sakdiah, S. (2021). Argumen Kesetaraan Jender Perspektif Al-Qur’an Karya Prof. Dr. Nasaruddin Umar, MA. Takammul: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam serta Perlindungan Anak, 10(1), 1–14. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/takamul/article/view/12589

Saputro, Y. E. (2021). Hakikat dan Majāz. Al-Ihda’: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran, 16(1), 604–609. https://jurnal-stainurulfalahairmolek.ac.id/index.php/ojs/article/view/49

Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Sulistiyo, U. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Salim Media Indonesia.

Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and Woman: Rereading the Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspective. Oxford University Press.

Wijaksono, A., & Ichsan, A. S. (2022). Pendidikan Gender dalam Buku Perempuan, Islam, dan Negara Karya K.H. Husein Muhammad. AN NUR: Jurnal Studi Islam, 14(2), 170–193. https://jurnalannur.ac.id/index.php/An-Nur/article/view/380

Wulandari, R., & Andaryuni, L. (2025). Maqāṣid Syariah sebagai Kerangka Kritik atas Bias Gender dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam Indonesia. Jurnal Tana Mana, 6(3), 420–429. https://ojs.staialfurqan.ac.id/jtm/article/view/640

Yunita, M., Amin, A. R. M., & Hilal, F. (2025). Lafaz Hakiki dan Majāzi dalam Penafsiran Nash: Kajian Makna, Metodologi Penerapan, serta Konsekuensi Hukumnya. ALMUSTOFA: Journal of Islamic Studies and Research, 2(2), 559–568. https://ejournal.bamala.org/index.php/almustofa/article/view/639


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.