Analisis Dilālah al-Mafhūm al-Mukhālafah dalam Ushul Fiqh dan Relevansinya terhadap Istinbath Hukum Islam Kontemporer Analysis of Dilālah al-Mafhūm al-Mukhālafah in Ushul Fiqh and Its Relevance to Contemporary Islamic Legal Derivation

Main Article Content

Abd. Rahman
Fatmawati Fatmawati
Abd. Syatar

Abstract

Mafhūm al-mukhālafah is one of the methods of legal derivation in uṣūl al-fiqh used to understand the implicit meaning of a scriptural text through an opposite interpretation of the wording stated. Although it has long been part of classical uṣūl al-fiqh studies, debates regarding its probative authority and relevance in addressing contemporary Islamic legal issues continue to persist. This study aims to analyze the concept, probative authority, and relevance of mafhūm al-mukhālafah in the process of contemporary Islamic legal derivation. This study used a qualitative approach with a library research design. Data were obtained through documentation studies of classical uṣūl al-fiqh texts, scientific articles, books, and contemporary literature discussing mafhūm al-mukhālafah and its application in modern Islamic law. The data were analyzed descriptively and analytically by examining the concept, scholarly arguments, and developments in its use across various contemporary issues. The results show that mafhūm al-mukhālafah has strong methodological legitimacy, particularly within the Shafi‘i school tradition, as an instrument for understanding the implicit meaning of scriptural texts. Its use in contemporary contexts has developed through integration with the maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah approach, making it relevant in responding to legal issues related to the digital economy, electronic transactions, and modern technological developments. This study also found differences in scholarly views regarding the probative authority of mafhūm al-mukhālafah, which are influenced by differing textual and contextual paradigms in legal derivation. The conclusion of this study affirms that mafhūm al-mukhālafah remains relevant as a methodological instrument in the development of contemporary Islamic law when used proportionally and integrated with the principles of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah. The contribution of this study lies in strengthening an uṣūl al-fiqh methodology that is adaptive to social change without disregarding the normative foundations of sharia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Citation data unavailable
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ricaldi Echevarria M.L. (2026)
    Educational inequalities in academic performance in secondary education in Peru: a multilevel analysis
    Praxis Educativa, 21
  2. Yáñez-Flores K.A. (2026)
    Analysis and reflection regarding the Pearce Case: Scientific fraud
    Cogitare Enfermagem, 31
  3. Toscano Aznar L. (2026)
    Neurosyphilis: descriptive analysis of clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes
    Enfermedades Infecciosas Y Microbiologia Clinica, 44(8)

Article Details

How to Cite
Rahman, A., Fatmawati, F., & Syatar, A. (2026). Analisis Dilālah al-Mafhūm al-Mukhālafah dalam Ushul Fiqh dan Relevansinya terhadap Istinbath Hukum Islam Kontemporer. ALSYS, 6(4), 1712-1731. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v6i4.10536

References

Alavi, M. A. N. (2019). مفہوم المخالفۃ کی حجیت میں اصولیین کا اختلاف: ایک تحقیقی جائزہ [Disagreement of Uṣūliyyīn in the validity of Mafhūm al-Mukhālafah: A research review]. Al-Qamar, 2(2), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.53762/x2tj8j36

An Nury, A. H., Bukhari, B., Nasution, S. P., Hasibuan, J., & Agustiar, A. (2024). Analisis Manthuq dan Mafhum dalam Makna Tersurat dan Tersirat. Hamalatul Qur’an: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Alqur’an, 5(2), 613–622. https://doi.org/10.37985/hq.v5i2.362

Arifudin MZ, M. (2025). Pemikiran Hukum Islam Era Digital: Analisis Metode Istinbat terhadap Isu Finansial Syariah. AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora, 6(1), 1032–1054. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v6i1.8277

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Danuri, M. (2019). Perkembangan dan Transformasi Teknologi Digital. Jurnal Ilmiah Infokam, 15(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.53845/infokam.v15i2.178

Ihsanudin, I. (2018). Logika Terbalik sebagai Dilālat al-Naṣṣ Mazhab Mutakallimin dan Aḥnāf. Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 3(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.14421/jkii.v3i2.1203

Mahmood, S. (2024). The concept of “Mafhūm al-Mukhālafah” among the Usūliyīn and their impact on jurisprudential rulings [مفهوم المخالفة عند الأصوليين وأثره على الأحكام الفقهية]. Bannu University Research Journal in Islamic Studies, 11(1), 18–25. https://burjis.com/index.php/burjis/article/view/298

Mawardi, M. (2021). Mafhum Muwafaqah dan Implikasinya terhadap Masalah-Masalah Furu’iyyah. Hukum Islam, 21(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.24014/jhi.v21i1.10445

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Nafisya, Z. A., & Sapa, N. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Islam terhadap Transaksi Ekonomi Digital. Media Hukum Indonesia, 3(4), 602–608. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17685974

Nurdin, M. S., Haddade, A. W., & Santalia, I. (2022). The concept of Mutakallimin in the interpretation of Dilalah al-Lafa and its implications in Ikhtilaf Fikh. International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2), 116–140. https://doi.org/10.24252/ijis.v2i2.35012

Nurhartanto, A. (2023). Metode Penafsiran dalam Ushul Fiqih Kontemporer: Kajian terhadap Pendekatan Literal dan Kontekstual. Jurnal Pedagogy, 16(1), 55–66.

Nurjannah, S. (2021). Maqaṣid al-Syari’ah: Teori dan Aplikasi dalam Istinbaṭh Hukum Islam. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum, 17(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v17i2.3453

Oktaviani, R., Fatmawati, & Abidin, Z. (2025). Analysis of Ushul Fikih on Dilalat al-Mafhum al-Mukhalafah. Khuluqiyya: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Studi Islam, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v7i1.165

Rasyid, A. (2025). Memaknai Dilalah Lafziyah dalam Memahami Makna Al-Qurán. Jurnal Cerdas Hukum, 3(1), 126–136. https://ejournal.instituthidayatullahbatam.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-cerdas-hukum/article/view/339

Salim, M. S., Hafidhuddin, D., & Susanto, H. (2023). Pengaruh Dilālah Al-Alfāẓ dalam Perkembangan Fatwa Zakat Kontemporer. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 6(2), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.30595/jhes.v0i0.17332

Sauqi, M., Rahmah, N. S., Sa’adah, N., & Eriyati, E. (2026). Konsep Mafhum Muwafaqah dan Mukhalafah dalam Ushul Fiqh serta Implikasi terhadap Istinbath Hukum Islam. Sharia Law and Justice Journal, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30821/slj.v2i1.56

Subagiyo, R. (2018). Implementasi Al-Dalalah Mafhum Al-Mukhalafah Al-Syafi’iyah dalam Ilmu Ekonomi Islam. Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies, 6(2), 83–98. https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/nizham/article/view/1311

Wilya, E. (2016). Mafhum Muwafaqah dan Implikasinya dalam Istinbath Hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.30984/as.v8i2.5

Zarah, M. M., Fatmawati, & Sultan, L. (2024). Pendekatan Tekstual dan Kontekstual terhadap Pelaksanaan Hukum Islam. Hukum Responsif, 15(1), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v15i1.8911

Zuhroni, Z. (2012). Studi Komparasi Metodologi Penetapan Hukum Islam Lembaga-Lembaga Fatwa di Indonesia. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v3i1.834


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.