Penerapan Hukum Perdata Internasional dalam Sengketa Merek Lintas Batas: Studi Kasus IKEA (PT Ratania Khatulistiwa Indonesia vs. IKEA Swedia) The Application of Private International Law in Cross-Border Trademark Disputes: A Case Study of IKEA (PT Ratania Khatulistiwa Indonesia vs. IKEA Sweden)
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the application of Private International Law (PIL) in resolving cross-border trademark disputes, focusing on the case of IKEA Sweden versus PT Ratania Khatulistiwa Indonesia. The dispute arose due to differing legal principles: Indonesia’s legal system adheres to the first to file principle, while international systems recognize the first use principle and the protection of well-known trademarks. The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia ruled in favor of the domestic party, concluding that IKEA Sweden did not meet the criteria for active use of the trademark in Indonesia. This study employs a normative legal approach using a descriptive-analytical method through literature review. The analysis is based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and incorporates statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, encompassing the principles of jurisdiction, choice of law, and recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. The findings reveal that the Indonesian legal system has not fully accommodated PIL principles, particularly regarding the protection of well-known trademarks. The lack of harmony between the principle of good faith and the principle of territoriality has resulted in legal uncertainty, especially for foreign investors. Moreover, the recognition and enforcement mechanism for foreign judgments remains ineffective, potentially leading to conflicting rulings in multi-forum litigation. This study concludes that reformulating the national legal system in alignment with PIL principles and international standards is crucial to enhancing trademark protection and fostering legal certainty in support of a globally competitive investment climate.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Achsin, M. Z., & Rosalinda, H. (2021). Teori-Teori Migrasi Internasional. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Ali, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika
Bailey, S., & Milligan, A. (2022). On Branding: Dampak Digital Terhadap Merek. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Berliana. (2020). Sengketa “Merek Tidur” Antara Ikea Swedia Dengan Ikea Surabaya. Jurnal Unpas. DOI: 10.57235/jleb.v2i2.3009
Campi, M. (2019). Intellectual property rights, trade agreements, and international trade. Research Policy, 48(3), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.011
Devina. et. al (2024) Pendekatan Hukum Perdata Internasional dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Terkait Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Bidang Merek (Sengketa IKEA PT Ratania Khatulistiwa Indonesia dan IKEA Swedia). Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice. Vol 1 No. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i3.2123
Gultom, M. H. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Terdaftar Terhadap Pelanggaran Merek. Jurnal Warta Edisi 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i56.14
Gunakaya, A. W. (2024). Hukum Pidana Internasional. Takaza Innovatix Labs.
Jaya. (2020). Analisis Yuridis (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 264k/Pdt.Sus Hki/2015) Terhadap Penghapusan Pendaftaran Merek Akibat Merek Tidak Dipergunakan Dalam Kegiatan Perdagangan. Jurnal UNDIKSHA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v2i2.208
Jonaedi Efendi, S. H. I., Johnny Ibrahim, S. H., & Se, M. M. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum: normatif dan empiris. Prenada Media.
Karina, R. M. P., & Njatrijani, R. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang Ikea Atas Penghapusan Merek Dagang. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 194-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i2.194-212
Komuna. (2013). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Internasional Terkait Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Universitas Hasanuddin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i10.13124
Nurmawati, I. B., & SH, M. (2024). Hukum Merek. Mega Press Nusantara.
Pangestu, R. R., & Masrur, D. R. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Ikea (Analisa Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 264 K/Pdt. Sus-Hki/2015). JCA of Law, 1(2).
Pramudya, W. (2016). Analisis Iktikad Tidak Baik (Bad Faith) dalam Pendaftaran dan Penggunaan Nama Domain Internet (Doctoral dissertation, UII Yogyakarta). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v19i1.11415
Purwadi, A. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perdata Internasional. Universitas Wijaya Kusuma.
Rahayu, A. P., & Indrawati, S. (2024). Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.
Rifa’i, I. J., Purwoto, A., Ramadhani, M., Rusydi, M. T., Harahap, N. K., Mardiyanto, I., ... & Surasa, A. (2023). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Sinaga, N. A. (2020). Pentingnya Perlindungan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Bagi Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 6(2), 144-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v6i2.385
Siwiyanti, L., Martoyo, A., Ramdan, A. M., Mulyanti, A. S., Rahmawati, E., Usadi, M. P. P., ... & Satar, M. (2024). Pemasaran Internasional. TOHAR MEDIA.
Sugeng. (2021). Memahami Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia (Edisi Pertama).
Suyanto, S. H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris Dan Gabungan. Unigres Press
Undang – Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang–Undang No. 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. (2001).
Widiatno. (2020). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual.
Yulia. (2016). Hukum Perdata Internasional.














