Pemenuhan Hak Ganti Rugi Jemaah Umrah sebagai Konsumen dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (Studi Kasus PT Khazanah Tamma Internasional) Fulfillment of Umrah Pilgrims’ Right to Compensation as Consumers from the Perspective of Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection (Case Study of PT Khazanah Tamma Internasional)
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
4131-4143
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11694
Viewed: 14 times
Downloaded: 3 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Frengky Mahulette1*, Muhammad Hazmi Adzhani2, Yuyut Prayuti3
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The organization of Umrah pilgrimage travel constitutes a religious service that establishes a legal relationship between Umrah pilgrimage travel organizers (PPIUs) and pilgrims as consumers. However, cases of failure to depart, departure delays, and embezzlement of funds continue to cause material and immaterial losses to pilgrims and demonstrate that consumer rights have not been fully fulfilled. This study aimed to analyze the responsibility of business actors in fulfilling Umrah pilgrims’ right to compensation under Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection through a case study of PT Khazanah Tamma Internasional. This study employed a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. Research materials were collected through a literature review of legislation, scientific journals, and news reports related to the PT Khazanah Tamma Internasional case and were then analyzed normatively. The findings showed that PT Khazanah Tamma Internasional, as a business actor, was legally responsible for providing compensation, damages, and/or replacement to pilgrims for losses arising from the failure to provide the services as agreed. This responsibility was based on Article 19 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. However, fulfilling the right to compensation faced obstacles in the form of the company’s limited assets, lengthy legal proceedings, and weak oversight of PPIUs. This study concludes that the regulation of business actors’ responsibility has provided a legal basis for protecting pilgrims, but the effectiveness of its implementation still needs to be strengthened. These findings imply the need to enhance government oversight and develop more effective legal protection mechanisms to ensure the fulfillment of pilgrims’ rights as consumers of religious services.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Alasmari A. (2026)Mitigating the risk of invasive meningococcal disease in the umrah setting: Epidemiology, surveillance, and vaccination strategiesJournal of Infection and Public Health, 19(7)
-
Khamis A. (2026)Design and Evaluation of an Agentic AI Framework for Personalized Umrah Trip PlanningArabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 51(9), 12299-12319
-
Saglan Y. (2026)Nasopharyngeal Carriage of Neisseria meningitidis in 181 Hajj and Umrah Pilgrims in Türkiye: Pre- and Post-Travel Prevalence and Serogroup Distribution nMedical Science Monitor International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 32, e952640
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Baladika, A., Hayatuddin, K., & Tanzili, M. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Korban dalam Wanprestasi dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 6(2), 1335–1346. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i2.6709
Ciptawan, C., Ginting, B., Sunarmi, S., & Siregar, M. (2023). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen terhadap Produk yang Tidak Memenuhi Kewajiban Standar Nasional Indonesia. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v3i1.39
Effendi, Z., Gaol, S. L., & Darwis, N. (2023). Pelaksanaan Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) sebagai Lembaga Quasi Yudisial dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di Indonesia. Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial dan Sains, 12(2), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v12i2.18848
Izazi, F. S., Sajena, P., Kirana, R. S., & Marsaulina, K. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen dalam Transaksi E-Commerce melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan melalui Sistem Elektronik. Leuser: Jurnal Hukum Nusantara, 1(2), 8–14. https://journal.myrepublikcorp.com/index.php/leuser/article/view/73
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2009, July 18). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. JDIH Kemkomdigi. https://jdih.komdigi.go.id/produk_hukum/view/id/147/t/undangundang%2Bnomor%2B25%2Btahun%2B2009%2Btanggal%2B18%2Bjuli%2B2009
Mukhlis, S. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Jemaah Umrah dalam Penyelenggaraan Perjalanan Ibadah Umrah. Asy-Syari’ah, 20(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v20i1.3011
Pemerintah Pusat Indonesia. (1999, April 20). Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Database Peraturan BPK. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45288/uu-no
Perpajakan DDTC. (n.d.). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Retrieved August 9, 2026, from https://perpajakan.ddtc.co.id/id/sumber-hukum/peraturan-pusat/undang-undang-8-tahun-1999
Pusat Konsultasi dan Bantuan Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. (2014, September 3). Perbedaan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Wanprestasi. https://pkbh.uad.ac.id/975/
Riwu, A. L. M. R. (2026). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Metro Press Indonesia.
Rosidin, E. (2026). Strategi Pemasaran Haji dan Umrah dalam Perspektif Marketing Syariah. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 4(1), 1–15. https://ecosemica.net/index.php/ECONOMICA/article/view/1203
Stiawan, E., & Yarmunida, M. (2019). Analisis Faktor Motivasi Jati Diri Muslim Melaksanakan Haji dan Umrah. Jurnal BAABU AL-ILMI: Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 4(1), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.29300/ba.v4i1.1700
Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris sebagai Strategi Penguatan Perspektif Kajian Ilmu Hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://notarylaw.journal.ulm.ac.id/index.php/nolaj/article/view/116
Universitas Stikubank. (2024, November 30). Hak dan Kewajiban Warga Negara Indonesia. https://www.unisbank.ac.id/v3/hak-dan-kewajiban-warga-negara-indonesia/
Vallensia, D., Theonardo, F., Gunawan, F., & Collin W, K. (2025). Analisis Hukum terhadap Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Penunjukan Distributor. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(5), 4202–4208. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4680