Persepsi Penghulu tentang Syarat Adil Saksi dan Implementasinya dalam Akad Nikah di KUA Kota Bukittinggi Perceptions of Penghulu Regarding the Requirement That Witnesses Be Just and Its Implementation in Marriage Contracts at the KUA in Bukittinggi City

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The status of witnesses in a marriage contract plays an important role in Islamic law, but the application of the requirement of moral probity for witnesses in service practices at the Offices of Religious Affairs (KUA) continues to face challenges, particularly in determining its indicators and assessment mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the perceptions of Islamic marriage registrars (penghulu) regarding the requirement of moral probity for witnesses and its implementation in the solemnization of marriage contracts at KUA offices throughout Bukittinggi City. The study employed a qualitative approach with a field research design. Data were collected through observation, interviews with Islamic marriage registrars, documentation, and a literature review and were subsequently analyzed through the stages of data collection, cleaning, organization, presentation, interpretation, and verification. The findings indicate that Islamic marriage registrars no longer interpret the concept of moral probity normatively and strictly as formulated in classical Islamic jurisprudence but assess it based on outward conditions, social reputation, and the principle of husnuzan. The implementation of the requirement of moral probity for witnesses tends to be administrative and social in nature, without an in-depth verification of the witnesses’ morality. The assessment focuses more on fulfilling formal requirements, including being Muslim, having reached puberty, being of sound mind, possessing clear identification, and being able to participate in the marriage contract process. These findings indicate a transformation in the interpretation of witness probity from a normative-theological concept toward a practical, administrative, and contextual approach. This study emphasizes the need for more detailed guidelines or standard operating procedures to standardize assessments of witness eligibility without disregarding service accessibility and the objectives of Islamic law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Citation data unavailable from the configured source
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Yousaf A. (2026)
    The Mediating Role of Intrinsic Religious Orientation and Ikhlaas Between Religious Emphasis and Spiritual Well-Being Among Muslim Adults
    Pastoral Psychology, 75(3), 415-428
  2. Lasito (2026)
    How You See It and How You Feel It: Indonesian Students' Perception on Translanguaging Practices in EFL Classes
    Sustainable Multilingualism, 28(1), 66-98
  3. Muhammad D.B. (2026)
    AN EXAMINATION OF DE-EXTINCTION: HOW DOES DE-EXTINCTION CHALLENGE BIODIVERSITY GOVERNANCE IN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
    Mimbar Hukum, 38(1), 1-26

Article Details

How to Cite
Hasanah, W., & Tarihoran, A. S. (2026). Persepsi Penghulu tentang Syarat Adil Saksi dan Implementasinya dalam Akad Nikah di KUA Kota Bukittinggi. AHKAM, 5(4), 3939-3955. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11483

References

Abdurahman, I., & Hermansyah. (2024). Asas Pernikahan di Indonesia: Undang-Undang Perkawinan Nomor 1 Tahun 1974, Hukum Islam, dan Hukum Adat Sunda. As-Sakinah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2(2), 150–163. https://jurnal.staip.ac.id/index.php/sakinah/article/view/641

Akbar, A. R. (2023). Ijab Kabul Secara Virtual dalam Perspektif Fiqh Mazhab. Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 22(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.24014/af.v22i2.28771

Ardiansyah, Risnita, & Jailani, M. S. (2023). Teknik Pengumpulan Data dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. IHSAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57

Athar, M. (2022). Konsep Pernikahan dalam Al-Quran. Al-Adillah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 2(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.61595/aladillah.v2i1.324

Beddu, M. J., Ijudin, A., Wakira, I., & Nurasikin. (2024). Dinamika Implementasi Rukun Nikah: Studi Etnografis tentang Praktik dan Makna Simbolis dalam Pernikahan di Masyarakat Kontemporer. Addayyan, 19(2), 1–10. https://jurnalstaiibnusina.ac.id/index.php/AD/article/view/272

Briantoyo, F., Huda, N., Alisa, F., & Rosdiana, R. (2026). Konsep Perkawinan dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam: Pengertian, Konsep, Rukun dan Syarat Sah Pernikahan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang dan KHI. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 10(1), 8736–8745. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v10i1.37843

Febrian, M. R., & Hasan, S. R. (2024). Konsep Keluarga Muslim dalam Menjaga Fitrah Seksual Anak. Al-Majaalis: Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah, 12(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.37397/al-majaalis.v12i1.620

Izzuddin, A., Ni’ami, M. F., Rouf, A., & Irfan, M. (2024). From exclusivism to openness: Deconstructing the role of deaf individuals as marriage witnesses in the Compilation of Islamic Law. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 17(2), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2024.17208

Jannah, M. (2024). Ratio Decidendi Hakim terhadap Pemberian Nafkah dalam Cerai Gugat Perspektif Teori Maslahah Mursalah (Studi Putusan Nomor 801/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Clg) [Master’s thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/52869

Malisi, A. S. (2022). Pernikahan dalam Islam. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 1(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v1i1.97

Minnuril Jannah, R. N., & Halim, A. (2022). Edukasi Pra Nikah sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Perceraian Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif. Amalee: Indonesian Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 3(1), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.37680/amalee.v3i1.1308

Mukhsin, M. K. (2019). Saksi yang Adil dalam Akad Nikah Menurut Imam Al-Syâfi’i Ditinjau dari Maqâshid Al-Syarîah. Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 18(1), 92–105. https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/al-fikra/article/view/7303

Nasrulloh, A. M., Nur Cholis, M., & Sucipto, I. (2023). Analysis of the position of marriage witnesses in the opinions of the four madzhabs fiqh and regulations in Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 10(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.v10i1.37880

Norcahyono. (2021). Konstruksi Akad Nikah (Ijab dan Kabul) dalam Kitāb Al-Nikāh Karya Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 14(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2021.14208

Nurhayati, N., Apriyanto, A., Ahsan, J., & Hidayah, N. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Praktik. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Rahmawati, A., Halimah, N., Karmawan, K., & Setiawan, A. A. (2024). Optimalisasi Teknik Wawancara dalam Penelitian Field Research melalui Pelatihan Berbasis Participatory Action Research pada Mahasiswa Lapas Pemuda Kelas IIA Tangerang. Jurnal Abdimas Prakasa Dakara, 4(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.37640/japd.v4i2.2100

Ridwan, A., Salim, A., Karmila, R., Mahdayeni, M., Harja, H., & Septiawan, R. (2026). Analisis Data Penelitian Pendidikan: Konsep, Prosedur, dan Implementasi pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Mutiara: Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah, 4(3), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.59059/mutiara.v4i3.3121

Santoso, S., Kusnanto, E., & Saputra, M. R. (2022). Perbandingan Metode Pengumpulan Data dalam Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif serta Aplikasinya dalam Penelitian Akuntansi Interpretatif. OPTIMAL Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 2(3), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.55606/optimal.v2i3.4457

Topan, M. A., Lendrawati, L., Dewi, R. M., Yuliansyah, Y., & Sulistiyo, E. (2026). Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia: Kajian Normatif terhadap Konsep, Rukun, Syarat, dan Akibat Hukum Perkawinan. Jurnal Literasiologi, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.47783/literasiologi.v15i1.1128

Umami, H., & Aini, Q. (2023). Keabsahan Saksi dalam Pernikahan Menurut Hukum Islam. JAS MERAH: Jurnal Hukum dan Ahwal al-Syakhsiyyah, 2(2), 99–113. https://ejournal.staidapondokkrempyang.ac.id/index.php/jmjh/article/view/404