Fungsi Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Fidusia Terkait Perkara yang Diselesaikan melalui Restorative Justice The Function of Notaries in Drafting Fiduciary Deeds Related to Cases Resolved through Restorative Justice
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1869-1884
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10162
Viewed: 53 times
Downloaded: 36 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Fiorentina Fiorentina1*, Achmad Faishal2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although restorative justice (RJ) has been adopted in criminal law enforcement in Indonesia, the resulting settlement agreements often lack executorial force, leaving victims in legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the legal position of the Fiduciary Deed in supporting the RJ Settlement Deed and to construct an ideal legal framework for synchronizing the two deeds. This study used a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed prescriptively using the deductive method. The results show that the Fiduciary Deed, as an accessory agreement, fundamentally transforms the victim’s position from complainant to preferred creditor, converts the promise of compensation into a security right in rem, and provides executorial force equivalent to a court decision. Following Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, notaries play a strategic role in formulating adaptive default clauses. This study also identifies three integration models, with the Notarial Settlement Deed model as the model with the strongest legal force. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of the Fiduciary Deed as a legal instrument that provides executorial power to settlement agreements in RJ, so that the objective of victim recovery can be realized more certainly and quickly. The implications of this study include recommendations for amending the Fiduciary Security Law, revising Perpol No. 8/2021, issuing a Joint Regulation, and opening new professional and economic spaces for notaries.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Adila, R. N., Juniara, A., & Permana, V. G. P. (2024). The authority of the Republic of Indonesia Police (POLRI) in handling cases based on restorative justice. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(3), 1065–1079. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.8983
Adillah, M. H. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Notaris dalam Perkara Pidana Berkaitan dengan Akta Fidusia [Master’s thesis, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang]. UNISSULA Repository. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/32449/
Adjie, H. (2013). Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Refika Aditama.
Afdhol, M. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia dengan Objek Benda Inventory (Stok Barang Dagangan) Studi pada PT Bank Danamon Indonesia, Tbk Cabang Medan [Master’s thesis, Universitas Sumatera Utara]. Repositori USU. https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/17397
Agussari, R., Gozali, D. S., & Faishal, A. (2022). Akta Perdamaian oleh Notaris dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v3i2.14379
Andasasmita, K. (1983). Notaris Selayang Pandang. Alumni.
Astawa, I. G. P., Sugiartha, I. G. N. W., Sukadana, I. K., & Coresy, D. A. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Bidang Hukum. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Aziz, F. (2024). Analisa Penegakan Hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia: Studi Kasus Laporan Polisi Nomor: LP/B/31/III/2024/SPKT/Polresta Banyumas/Polda Jawa Tengah [Master’s thesis, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang]. UNISSULA Repository. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/38035/
Fridoki, O., Syahrin, A., Sunarmi, & Marlina. (2022). Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Penipuan dan Penggelapan di Polrestabes Medan. Res Nullius Law Journal, 4(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v4i1.4679
InfoPublik. (2025). Jampidum Setujui 1.985 Perkara Dihentikan lewat Restorative Justice Selama 2024. https://infopublik.id/kategori/nasional-politik-hukum/896186/jampidum-setujui-1-985-perkara-dihentikan-lewat-restorative-justice-selama-2024
Jacobs, P., & van Kampen, P. (2014). Dutch ‘ZSM settlements’ in the face of procedural justice: The sooner the better? Utrecht Law Review, 10(4), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.291
Jamil, M. S. J. (2025). Restorative Justice: Urgensi Harmonisasi Regulasi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Parhesia, 3(1), 57–66. https://jurnal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Parhesia/article/view/3281
Leonardo, A., & Yakub, Y. (2025). Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia melalui Sistem Layanan AHU Online di Kantor Notaris Fifi Rahmayanti, S.H., M.Kn. Sakato Law Journal, 3(1), 41–54. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/SLJ/article/view/6470
Mertokusumo, S. (1977). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Liberty.
Octaviani, V. (2023). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Peran Notaris dalam Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia [Master’s thesis, Universitas YARSI]. Universitas YARSI Digital Library. https://digilib.yarsi.ac.id/11823/
Otto, J. M., & Moeliono, T. (2003). Kepastian Hukum di Negara Berkembang. Komisi Hukum Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Pratama, R. A. (2019). Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Menggadaikan Barang Jaminan Fidusia melalui Sarana Mediasi Penal. Badamai Law Journal, 4(2), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v4i2.9265
Radbruch, G. (1914). Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft. Verlag von S. Hirzel.
Rizkia, N. D., & Purba, N. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. PT Inovasi Pratama Internasional.
Sabalino, A., Ridwan, H., & Hasan, M. H. (2022). Pendekatan Penelitian Hukum.
Sari, L. K. (2017). Pengecualian Asas Droit de Suite pada Objek Jaminan Fidusia berupa Benda Persediaan [Master’s thesis, Universitas Airlangga]. Repository Universitas Airlangga. https://repository.unair.ac.id/60613/
Sasongko, D., Faishal, A., & Ramadhany, I. (2022). Peran Notaris dalam Transformasi Hukum ke Ranah Perdata atas Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Restorative Justice. Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 9(6), 2949–2960. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v9i6.2949-2960
Sepalia, W. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum yang Berbasis Asas Proporsional terhadap Debitur dan Kreditur dalam Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18. Lex Lata, 2(3), 514–535. https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v2i3.821
Sitorus, D. D. F. (2026). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Peran Jaksa dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Mojokerto. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62281/bvsf9062
Sumarga, H., & Fitriasih, S. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana atas Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Autentik: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 1362/PID.B/2019/PN.JKT.UTR. Indonesian Notary, 3(2), Article 26. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol3/iss2/26
Suzuki, M., & Otani, A. (2017). Myths of restorative features in the Japanese justice system and society: The role of apology, compensation and confession, and application of reintegrative shaming. Restorative Justice, 5(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2017.1339955
Tanaka, H. (1995). Resolution of traffic accident disputes and judicial activism in Japan. Law in Japan, 25, 63–81. https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/lij25§ion=6
Taufik, A. A. (2024). Penerapan Restorative Justice terhadap Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah yang Melakukan Penggelapan Pajak [Master’s thesis, Universitas Hasanuddin]. Repository UNHAS. https://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/45444/
Widjaja, G. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Zehr, H. (2002). The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Good Books.