Kedudukan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Aparatur Sipil Negara di Indonesia The Position of the State Administrative Judiciary in the Resolution of State Civil Apparatus Disputes in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1849-1868
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10150
Viewed: 108 times
Downloaded: 76 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Subri Subri1*, Aqilah Dzakirah2, Olga Arawinda Nasiswa3, Anisya Nurroliyati Rahmadina4, Madinar Madinar5
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The State Administrative Court (PTUN) plays a central role as an instrument of judicial oversight of personnel administrative decisions that may harm State Civil Apparatus (ASN). This study aims to analyze the mechanism for resolving ASN personnel disputes through the PTUN from the aspects of authority, procedure, and the substance of personnel administrative decisions, as well as to examine forms of legal protection for ASN who are harmed by decisions of dishonorable dismissal. This study used a normative legal method with a statutory approach and a case approach, referring to Jakarta State Administrative Court Decision Number 170/G/2020/PTUN.Jkt as the main analytical material. The results show that the mechanism for resolving ASN personnel disputes through the PTUN is systematic and multilayered. ASN are first required to pursue administrative remedies in the form of objections and administrative appeals before filing a lawsuit with the PTUN, which subsequently examines the validity of the State Administrative Decision based on authority, procedure, and its conformity with the General Principles of Good Governance. Legal protection for ASN subjected to dishonorable dismissal is realized through two dimensions, namely preventive protection in the form of guarantees of a fair examination process and the right to defend oneself, and repressive protection in the form of the right to pursue the state administrative court mechanism accompanied by the right to rehabilitation if the lawsuit is granted. The conclusion of this study emphasizes that the PTUN has an important position in ensuring legal certainty, procedural justice, and the protection of ASN rights in personnel administrative disputes. The implications of the study show that the effectiveness of legal protection for ASN greatly depends on the quality of evidence and procedural compliance from the early stages of the personnel process.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Selvaraj M.K. (2026)Evaluating the evolutionary relationship of TATA binding protein (TBP) with various folding patterns of protein domains using support vector machine (SVM)Scientific Reports, 16(1)
-
Gambarino S. (2026)Analytical validation of a high-resolution melting assay for UGT1A1 TATA-box polymorphismsMolecular Biology Reports, 53(1)
-
Kaur S. (2026)Electric vehicles as a pathway to India’s sustainable development goalsDiscover Sustainability, 7(1)
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Afifah, S. M. (2022). Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Kepegawaian. Prosiding Serina, 2(1), 725–732. https://doi.org/10.24912/pserina.v2i1.19795
Azizah, N. I., & Sitabuana, T. H. (2021). Analisis Pemberhentian Tidak dengan Hormat sebagai Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(1), 865–888. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v4i1.11247
Badan Kepegawaian Negara. (2025, February 26). Hasil Sidang Banding Administratif, Kepala BKN: 20 Pegawai ASN Diberhentikan! https://www.bkn.go.id/hasil-sidang-banding-administratif-kepala-bkn-20-pegawai-asn-diberhentikan/
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. (2017). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokumen/jdih/undang-undang-dasar
Erawan, D. I. I., Ilmar, A., & Mirzana, H. A. (2024). Pemberhentian Tidak dengan Hormat Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Gorontalo Law Review, 7(1), 156–179. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v7i1.2904
Faisal, F. (2024). Upaya Administratif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Ar-Risalah, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30863/arrisalah.v4i1.5601
Hidayat, S. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Aparatur Sipil Negara terhadap Keputusan Pemberhentian Tidak dengan Hormat dalam Perspektif Hukum (Studi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Putusan Nomor 36/PUU-XXIII/2025). Jurnal RechtsVinding, 11(1), 89–104.
HR, R. (2018). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Junias, M. I. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pegawai Aparatur Sipil Negara. PTUN Surabaya. https://www.ptun-surabaya.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PENYELESAIAN-SENGKETA-APARATUR-SIPIL-NEGARA.pdf
Kurniawan, F. W., & Hidayat, B. (2022). Upaya Hukum Banding Administratif Pasca Penjatuhan Hukuman Disiplin Berat ASN. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v3i2.14329
Kurniawan, I. D., & Handayani, F. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Aparatur Sipil Negara: Studi Kasus Surat Keterangan Bupati Dompu. Civics Education and Social Science Journal (CESSJ), 6(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.32585/cessj.v6i1.5044
Maki, J. Y. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Aparatur Sipil Negara Melalui Upaya Administratif. Lex Privatum, 13(4), 1–8. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/56593
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Nashir, M. A. (2024). Pudarnya Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Sengketa Perizinan atas Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Omnibus Law). Taruna Law: Journal of Law and Syariah, 2(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.54298/tarunalaw.v2i01.178
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Pemerintahan Setelah Menempuh Upaya Administratif. (2018). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/206066/perma-no-6-tahun-2018
Permadi, I. (2021). Aspek Hukum Pemberhentian Pegawau Negeri Sipil Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 30 Tahun 2019 tentang Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 4(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v4i1.6893
Philipis, H. (2021). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Rahman, M. S., & N.K, M. L. (2022). Analisis Problematika Putusan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Sengketa Kepegawaian. KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, 16(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v16i2.1209
Rakhmawanto, A. (2015). Analisis Peran Pejabat Pembina Kepegawaian dan Pejabat yang Berwenang dalam Pembinaan ASN di Instansi Pemerintah (Studi: Kabupaten Lampung Utara, Kota Cilegon, dan Kota Kediri). Jurnal Bina Praja, 7(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.07.2015.227-237
Simanjuntak, E. (2014). Prospek Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dalam Rangka Memperkuat Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 3(2), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.163-176
Sodiq, M. M. H. (2021). Upaya Administratif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepegawaian. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i1.4480
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.
Susiana, P. (2025). Penyalahgunaan Diskresi Pejabat Pemerintahan sebagai Objek Sengketa di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Magistra Vitae: Journal Magister Hukum, 1(2), 56–69. https://e-journal.umaha.ac.id/magistrav/article/view/17221
Syafputra, R., & Nurbeti. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Padang dalam Memutus Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Terkait Surat Keputusan Pemberhentian Aparatur Sipil Negara yang Melakukan Kejahatan dalam Jabatan (Studi Putusan Nomor: 24/G/2019/PTUN-PDG). Abstract of Undergraduate Research, Faculty of Law, Bung Hatta University, 11(2). https://ejurnal.bunghatta.ac.id/index.php/JFH/article/view/18234
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. (2023). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/269470/uu-no-20-tahun-2023
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (2009). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38851/uu-no-51-tahun-2009
Wiyardi, U., Sukardan, E., & Chariansyah, H. (2023). Pemberhentian Pegawai Negeri Sipil Secara Tidak Hormat Karena Melakukan Kejahatan Jabatan. Binamulia Hukum, 12(2), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i2.705