Comparism between Keratometric and Subjective Astigmatic Correction in a Black Population
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
41-47
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/kijst.v2i1.4755
Viewed: 319 times
Downloaded: 227 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Emoefe Sunny Odjimogho1, Stella E. Odjimogho2
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study was carried out to compare keratometric and subjective astigmatic corrections. The method involved the examination of one hundred (100) subjects aged between 16 – 35 years with mean age of 22.74±4.55. The sample population comprised of fifty (50) males and fifty (50) females who were all Astigmats and had no history of any systemic/ocular pathologies and ocular surgery. The subjective correction was determined with static retinoscopic and subjective refractive techniques using the Jackson cross cylinder (JCC). The keratometric measurement was done with the Bausch and Laumb (B&L) keratometer. The result obtained revealed that the observed mean Astigmatic reading with the B&L keratometer was -0.858±0.629 while that of subjective was -1.20±0.79, and there was a significant difference between the two methods (subjective and keratometric) using the paired t – test (t = 5.787, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between keratometric or subjective readings (p>0.05) which implied that either of these two methods could be used to estimate patients astigmatic correction.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Chu, C.H., Kee, C.S. (2015). Effects of optically imposed astigmatism on early eye growth in chicks. PLoS One, 10:e0117729.
Fan, D.S.P., Rao, S.K., Cheung, E.Y.Y., Islam, M., Chew, S., Lam, D.S.C. (2004). Astigmatism in Chinese Children; Prevalence, Change and Effect on Refractive Development. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 88(7): 938 – 941.
Fotouhi, A., Hashemi, H., Yekta, A.A. (2011). Characteristics of astigmatism in a population of schoolchildren, Dezful, Iran. Optometry Vision Science, 88:1054-9.
Furlan, W.D., Remon, L., Benlloch, J. (2009). Corneal Astigmatism and Refractive Astigmatism in Adults; A Power Vector’s Analysis. Optometry and Vision Science. 86:1182 – 1186.
Goyal, S., Phillips, P.H., Rettiganti, M. (2018). Comparison of the Effect of Cycloplegia on Astigmatism Measurements in a Pediatric Amblyopic Population: A Prospective Study. Journal Pediatrician Ophthalmology Strabismus, 2018;55:293-8.
Grosvernor, T. (2002). Primary Care Optometry. 4th edition. Butterworth – Heinemann. 21 – 29, 227 – 229.
Hashemi, H., Asgari, S., Emamian, M.H., Meharavaran, S., Fotouhi, A. (2015). Age related changes in corneal curvature and shape. The Shahroud eye cohort Study, Cornea, 34 (11) 1456-1458.
Kanclerz, P., Bazylczyk, N., Lanca, C. (2023). The Prevalence of Astigmatism and Spectacle Wear in Polish Schoolchildren. Journal of Binocular Vision of Ocular Motility, 73:124-30.
Nemeth, G., Szalai, E., Berta, A., Modis, L. Jr. (2013). Astigmatism prevalence and biometric analysis in normal population. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 23 (6): 779-783.
Orucoghi, F., Akman, M., Onal, S. (2015). Analysis of Age, refractive error and gender related changes of the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye with Scheimpflug imaging. Contact lens Anterior Eye, Journal of British Clinical Association, 38 (5): 345-350.
Osaki, T., Osaki, M.H., Osaki, T.H. (2016). Influence of involuntary eyelid spasms on corneal topographic and eyelid morphometric changes in patients with hemifacial spasm. British Journal of Ophthalmology,100:963-70.
Sridhar, M.S. (2018). Anatomy of the Cornea and Ocular Surface. (2018). Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 66(2): 190-194.
Vasudevan, B., Ciuffreda, K.J., Meehan, K., Grk, D., Cox, M. (2016). Comparison of objective refraction in darkness to cycloplegic refraction: a pilot study. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 99(2):168–172. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12367.
Xiong, X.W., Zhou, L.H., Zeng, C.Q. (2019). Analysis of astigmatism characteristics of school-age children aged 7~12 years in Wuhan. Chinease Journal of Strabismus Pediatrician Ophthalmology, 27: 23-24+61-62+25.
Yang, Z., Lu, Z., Shen, Y. (2022). Prevalence of and factors associated with astigmatism in preschool children in Wuxi City, China. BMC Ophthalmology, 22:146.
Zhang, M.J., Xiao, Z.Y., Wu, Q.S. (2017). Epidemiological survey of astigmatism among 926 preschool children in a kindergarten in Enshi City. Internation Eye Science, 17:1689-92.
Zhao, Y.Z., Yu, J.F., Chu, H.H. (2021). Research on the effect of astigmatism on children's eye axis changes. Chinease Journal of Strabismus Pediatrician Ophthalmology, 29:29-30+32-33.