The Impact of Political Factionalism on Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
929-950
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.6935
Viewed: 301 times
Downloaded: 165 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Santa Bahadur Thapa1* 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the joint effects of factionalism within opposition groups and states on state strategies in diplomatic negotiations, focusing on how alignments across factional lines influence both internal cohesion and bargaining dynamics at the peace table. The theoretical framework posits that a state’s similarity to its regime and opposition factions significantly shapes negotiation outcomes, including the initiation, nature, and durability of peace agreements. The analysis advances three key propositions: first, states are more likely to engage in symbolic rather than substantive negotiations when their regimes align with at least one opposition faction; second, greater convergence of interests between regime and opposition factions increases the likelihood of reaching peace agreements; and third, conflicts marked by such similarity are more likely to result in compliance with agreements compared to cases without such alignment. Employing a comparative case study methodology, the research examines historical civil conflicts including the Salvadoran Civil War, the Nicaraguan Contra insurgency, the Guatemalan Civil War, the Honduran Contra War, and Algeria’s civil conflict. The findings demonstrate that regime–opposition similarity exerts a stronger influence on negotiation dynamics, agreement formation, and compliance than opposition similarity with third-party actors, offering new insights into the political mechanics of conflict resolution.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ashley Baggott, E. (2017). Three essays on U.S.-China relations. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493282
Bhattacharyya, M. (2018). Negotiating peace in divided societies: The role of internal factions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(1), 43-67.
Brown, J. (2017). The dynamics of political security and information protection. Journal of Security Studies, 12(3), 45-67.
Brown, K. (2010). Political fragmentation and opposition coalitions in South Asia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(2), 123–145.
Ceron, A. (2015). The politics of fission: An analysis of Faction Breakaways among Italian Parties (1946–2011). British Journal of Political Science, 45, 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000215
Chandra, R. (2021). Insurgent Dynamics and Political Strategies in South Asia. Journal of Conflict Studies, 45(2), 123-145.
Editor, I. B. P. P. (2000). State Security and Affairs of State. International Bulletin of Political Psychology, 8(16), 1-2. https://commons.erau.edu/ibpp/vol8/iss16/2
Ghosh, P. (2017). Negotiating peace in South Asia: Lessons from Sri Lanka and beyond. South Asian Journal of Conflict Resolution, 9(2), 45-67.
Gupta, A. (2022). Political discourse and international disputes in South Asia. Journal of Asian Politics, 15(3), 250-267.
Gupta, R., & Nirmal, A. (2020). The Dynamics of Factionalism in South Asian Conflicts. Journal of South Asian Studies, 12(3), 45-67.
Jalal, A. (1995). Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: A comparative and historical perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kalyan, A. (2020). Negotiating with Factionalized Insurgencies: Lessons from the Past. South Asian Review, 29(4), 56-78.
Khan, A. (2018). Beyond Walls: The Psychological Dimensions of Security in South Asia. South Asian Journal of International Relations, 7(2), 35-54.
Khan, M. (2021). Negotiating Peace: An Examination of Factional Power Dynamics. International Relations Review, 15(2), 365-389.
Khan, S. (2020). Political Factionalism and Diplomacy in South Asia. South Asian Journal of International Relations, 5(3), 157-175.
Khanna, P. S. M. (2018). Geopolitics and Peace Negotiations: A Comparative Study of Cyprus and Sri Lanka. Global Peace Research, 12(3), 78-92.
Kottegoda, R. G. K. (2016). The Challenges of Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka: Analyzing the Role of International Mediators. South Asian Journal of International Studies, 5(2), 45-60.
Kumar, A. (2018). Factionalism and political change in South Asia. Journal of South Asian Studies, 41(2), 123-145.
Kumar, R. (2017). Factionalism and its impact on governance in South Asia. Journal of South Asian Studies, 45(2), 123-145.
Kumar, R., & Singh, A. (2019). Institutional diversity and economic performance in South Asia: The role of veto players. Journal of South Asian Development, 14(2), 155-179. doi:10.1177/0973174119861234
Kumar, S. (2015). Factional politics and governance in South Asia: The case of India. Journal of South Asian Studies, 18(3), 45-67.
Lantis, J., & Beasley, R. (2017). Comparative foreign policy analysis. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (Oxford Research Encyclopedias). Oxford University Press. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.398
Perera, R. G. W. M. (2010). Political factionalism and governance in South Asia: A comparative perspective. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(1), 45-62.
Rebecca H. Best (2012). Negotiation in the Shadow of an Extremist Threat: Insurgencies and the Internal Commitment Problem. PhD dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. DOI: 10.17615/CHKB-BQ20
Singh, R. (2020). Factionalism and Its Impact on Party Dynamics in South Asia. South Asian Political Studies Journal, 8(2), 134–150.
Smith, J. (2020). The influence of party factions on international diplomacy. Global Politics Review, 15(3), 251-270.
Srinivasan, R. (2022). Understanding Factionalization: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Peace Studies, 27(1), 11-30.
Walters, R. (2020). Historical Perspectives on Physical Security: From Antiquity to Modernity. International Journal of Historical Security Studies, 15(1), 88-102.
Wood, E. J. (2010). The origin and efficacy of civil war peace agreements. International Security, 34(2), 126-155.
Zartman, I. W. (2005). Negotiation and Conflict Management: The Human Dimension. Routledge.
Zartman, W. I. (2001). The timing of peace initiatives: Hurting stalemates and flaunting opportunities. In P. C. Stern & D. W. Stauffer (Eds.), International Conflict Resolution (pp. 66-94). Westview Press