Statistical Analysis on Engagement Patterns of Fresh Graduates around Different Online Learning Platforms
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
839-861
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijemt.v3i3.7353
Viewed: 120 times
Downloaded: 145 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Ajao Olutunde Michael1*, Ayenigba Alfred Ayo2, Ojekunle Odegua Elizabeth3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the digital era, online learning platforms have become essential tools for delivering education at a global scale. This study examines user engagement across three major platforms—Coursera, edX, and LinkedIn Learning—with a focus on how engagement metrics correlate with perceived learning outcomes. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 124 fresh graduates (within 0–3 years post-graduation) through structured questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, t-tests, and chi-square tests. The results indicate that users primarily engage with these platforms to enhance employability and earn certifications, with Coursera and LinkedIn Learning being the most frequently used. Courses related to career-specific skills and personal development were highly preferred. Engagement frequency was high, with most participants accessing content daily or weekly. Motivating features included video lectures and interactive elements, while time constraints and high subscription costs were identified as major barriers. Regression analysis confirmed a statistically significant relationship between user engagement and perceived learning effectiveness (p ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, the study found significant differences in engagement patterns influenced by platform interactivity, content quality, and the availability of certifications. The study concludes that optimizing platform design by offering accessible, career-relevant content and reducing time and cost barriers is critical to improving learner engagement and educational outcomes.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Allen, I.E & Seaman, J(2017). Digital Learning Compass: Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digitallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf
Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed.) Athabasca University Press
Chen, P., Chavez, O., Ong, D. C., & Gunderson, B. (2017). Strategic Resource Use for Learning: A Self-Administered Intervention that Guides Self-Reflection on Effective Resource Use Enhances Academic Performance. Psychological Science, 28(6), 774-785.
Cummings, W. K. & Vyas, R (2014). Khan Academy and the transformation of the classroom, in T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education, Pergamon https://www.khanacademy.org/
Gonzales S. (2021). Analyzing Student Engagement in MOOCs: A Statistical Approach. MOOC Research Initiative.
Cluelabs. (2023). Improving student engagement through analysis of eLearning interaction data. https://cluelabs.com/blog/improving-student-engagement-through-analysis-of-elearninginteraction-data/
Federal Ministry of Education, Nigeria. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of implementing e-learning in Nigerian higher institutions. Teacher Perspective Journal, 18(1), 14. https://globalacademicgroup.com/journals/teacher%20perspective/V18N1P14_Perspective_2023 .pdf
Means B., Toyama Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. & Jones, K (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf
Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2017). Informing and Performing: A Study Comparing Adaptive Learning to Traditional Learning. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 20, 111-125.
Nwoke, C. N., & Okeke, C. I. O. (2019). Engagement, learning styles and challenges of learning in the digital era among Nigerian secondary school students. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(36), 1-8. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1239637.pdf
Oyelere, S. S., & Suhonen, J. (2023). Learning analytics on student engagement to enhance students’ learning experience: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(10), 7849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107849
Pappano, L. (2012). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times, December 2, 2012. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/
Pappano, L. (2017). TLearning for a lifetime. How Linkedln Learing is transforming propfessional education Harvard education review 87(2), 105-110