Students’ Preference between Off-Campus Cafes vs Campus Space for Group Studies
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
655-671
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijemt.v3i2.7015
Viewed: 1.965 times
Downloaded: 337 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Aashish Dahal1, Diya Bharati2, Kopila Subedi3, Rajika Roka4, Sanju Lamichhane5, Utsav Bhandari6, Suman kamal Parajuli7*
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates student preferences for off-campus cafes versus on-campus spaces as venues for group study, focusing on factors such as noise and distraction, social interaction, facilities, and overall productivity. Guided by a positivist philosophy and a deductive approach, the research adopts a descriptive and comparative design to analyze quantitative data from 141 college students collected through a structured self-administered questionnaire. Results indicate a general preference for off-campus cafes due to their comfortable atmosphere, robust digital facilities such as Wi-Fi and charging ports, and a social ambiance that fosters group interaction. However, cafes are also perceived as more distracting because of higher noise levels. In contrast, on-campus spaces are valued for access to academic resources, a motivating academic environment, and suitability for quiet, focused group work. Paired sample t-test results confirm significant differences in preferences between the two settings. The findings suggest that students choose study environments according to their specific needs seeking social engagement and comfort in cafes, and academic support and concentration on campus. The study recommends that educational institutions integrate both social and academic features in study space design to accommodate diverse learning styles and collaborative needs.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Khasanah A.N. (2027)Self-Health Literacy Among Students in Islamic School Science Education: A Comparative Analysis Across Gender, Grade Level, and School ContextAsean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 93-106
-
Artina F. (2027)Digital Literacy through a Web-Based Application: Addressing Polarization and Promoting Social Integration among Islamic Senior High School StudentsAsean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 51-66
-
Naemi Z. (2027)The Relationship between Second Language Learning Strategies, Learning Engagement, and Writing Skill in the Arabic Writing CurriculumLanguage Related Research, 17(4), 331-360
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2016). Learning space preferences of higher education students. Building and Environment, 104, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.013
De La Cruz, F. N. J., & Abillar, C. S. (2023). A comparative study of on-campus and off-campus internet facilities. American Journal of Smart Technology and Solutions, 2(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsts.v2i1.1351
Hsu, C. H. C., Chin, D. C. W., & Yau, O. K. T. (2022). Usage of informal learning spaces among students from academic units with versus without dedicated buildings on campus. Journal of Learning Spaces, 11(1), 1–16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1359061.pdf
Nuth Sloboda, B. (2023). The role of the interior designer in the autistic classroom: Location and material selection are essential for success. International Journal on Engineering, Science and Technology, 5(3), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonest.171
Oblinger, D. G., & Lippincott, J. K. (2006). Learning spaces. EDUCAUSE. https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/bookshelf/78
Papaioannou, G., Volakaki, M.-G., Kokolakis, S., & Vouyioukas, D. (2023). Learning spaces in higher education: A state-of-the-art review. Trends in Higher Education, 2(3), 526–545. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu2030032
Vanichvatana, S. (2019). Investigation of students’ preferences for off-campus informal learning spaces: The case of business school students in Bangkok. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(4), 590–600. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v11i4.4386
Zainuddin, Z., & Shujahat, M. (2022). Understanding students’ activities in Wi-Fi coffee shops in Aceh: A survey and narrative interview report. Englisia Journal of Language Education and Humanities, 10(1), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v10i1.15167