Developing Interactive E-Module to Enhancing Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability through Computational Thinking
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
375-384
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ijemt.v3i1.5207
Viewed: 384 times
Downloaded: 265 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Komang Hendri Nugraha Putra1, I Nengah Suparta2, I Gst. Putu Sudiarta3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to develop an interactive e-module oriented towards computational thinking to enhance the problem-solving skills of 10th-grade high school students in the topic of number sequences and series. The e-module was developed using the Plomp model, which consists of four stages: preliminary investigation, design, realization/construction, and test, evaluation, and revision. The e-module was developed using the Moodle platform with integration of H5P features and Scratch. The research was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Singaraja, involving three 10th-grade science classes. Research instruments included validation sheets, student and teacher response questionnaires, and a problem-solving ability test. The results show that the developed e-module met the validity criteria with an average score of 3.7 based on expert assessment. The e-module also met the practicality criteria with an average student response score of 4.56 and teacher response score of 4.71. The effectiveness of the e-module was demonstrated through a significant improvement in students' problem-solving abilities (p-value = 2.8293e-6 < 0.05) with a large effect size (Cohen's d = |-1.23537|). In conclusion, the developed interactive e-module oriented towards computational thinking is valid, practical, and effective in improving students' mathematical problem-solving skills in the topic of number sequences and series.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Acevedo-Borrega, J., Valverde-Berrocoso, J., & Garrido-Arroyo, M. del C. (2022). Computational thinking and educational technology: A scoping review of the literature. Education Sciences, 12(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010039
Al Kayyis, A., Tohir, M., & Muhasshanah, M. (2024). The urgency of Polya model problem-solving on students mathematical ability in facing the Industrial Revolution 5.0. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 6(2), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2024.v6i2.218-231
Amrullah, A., Chelladurai, S., Zulihi, Z., Ramdhani, M. I., Sukma, F. A. O., Patil, A. B., & Durgayan, A. (2024). Analysis of students’ learning problem solving skills through the application of Polya’s steps. International Journal of Education Research and Development, 4(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.52760/ijerd.v4i1.53
Calao, L., Moreno-León, J., Correa, H., & Robles, G. (2015). Developing Mathematical Thinking with Scratch An Experiment with 6th Grade Students (Vol. 9307). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_2
Costa, E. J. F., Campos, L. M. R. S., & Guerrero, D. S. (2017). Computational thinking in mathematics education: A joint approach to encourage problem-solving ability. 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–8. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:22879330
Erol, O., & Çırak, N. S. (2022). The effect of a programming tool scratch on the problem-solving skills of middle school students. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 4065–4086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10776-w
Fauzi, F. A., Ratnaningsih, N., & Lestari, P. (2022). Pengembangan Digibook Barisan dan Deret Berbasis Anyflip untuk Mengeksplor Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Peserta Didik. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1089
Fitria, W., Susilana, R., & Priatna, N. (2024). Analysis of problem-solving ability: Pólya’s strategy and positive attitude. Inovasi Kurikulum, 21(4), 2009–2020. https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v21i4.74803
Latifah, T., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Kesulitan dalam Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa pada Materi Statistika. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 3(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.37058/jarme.v3i2.3207
Lee, T. Y., Mauriello, M., Ahn, J., & Bederson, B. (2014). CTArcade: Computational thinking with games in school age children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2014.06.003
Liu, Z., Gearty, Z., Richard, E., Orrill, C. H., Kayumova, S., & Balasubramanian, R. (2024). Bringing computational thinking into classrooms: a systematic review on supporting teachers in integrating computational thinking into K-12 classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00510-6
Nico Pradana, L. (2024). Problem-solving strategy: Mathematical problem-solving model within the Polya’ framework. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i6.15327
OECD. (2019). Combined Executive Summaries PISA 2018. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf
Peters-Burton, E., Rich, P. J., Kitsantas, A., Laclede, L., & Stehle, S. M. (2022). High School Science Teacher Use of Planning Tools to Integrate Computational Thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(6), 598–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1970088
Rahmi, U., Ramadhani Fajri, B., & Azrul, A. (2024). Effectiveness of Interactive Content with H5P for Moodle-Learning Management System in Blended Learning. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.1135
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Sintawati, N. P., & Margunayasa, I. G. (2021). Interactive E-Module for Science Learning Content: Validity and Feasibility. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i1.34281
Supriyadi, E., Turmudi, T., Afgani Dahlan, J., & Juandi, D. (2024). Development of Sundanese Gamelan ethnomathematics e-module for junior high school mathematics learning. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 21(2), 139–178. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2024.21.2.6
Triantafyllou, S. A., Sapounidis, T., & Farhaoui, Y. (2024). Gamification and Computational Thinking in Education: A systematic literature review. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias, 3, 659. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024659
Wing, J. (2017). Computational Thinking’s Influence on Research and Education for All. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/922
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O.-L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: a systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w