Analisis Semiotik dalam Cerpen "Tak Ada yang Gila di Kota Ini" Karya Eka Kurniawan Telaah Lima Kode Roland Barthes A Semiotic Analysis of the Short Story No One is Crazy in This Town by Eka Kurniawan: An Examination of Roland Barthes’ Five Codes
Main Article Content
Abstract
Studies on the use of Roland Barthes’s five semiotic codes in Indonesian literature remain limited, particularly comprehensive analyses that explain how all five codes operate simultaneously within a single text. This study aims to analyze the operation of the proairetic, hermeneutic, cultural, semic, and symbolic codes in the short story “Tak Ada yang Gila di Kota Ini” by Eka Kurniawan and to explain their contribution to the construction of social critique in the narrative. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach with a textual analysis design, using lexemes, phrases, and sentences as data, which were collected through close reading and note-taking and analyzed using Barthes’s model of semiotic interpretation. The findings show that all of Barthes’s codes appear significantly and mutually reinforce each other: the proairetic code constructs a sequence of exploitative actions, the hermeneutic code generates enigmas surrounding characters’ identities and motives, the cultural code reveals tensions between moral values and economic power, while the semic and symbolic codes intensify the representation of social critique through the connotations and symbolization of the “mad person” character. These results contribute to the development of literary semiotics, particularly in understanding layered structures of meaning in contemporary Indonesian literary works, and underscore the importance of critical reading of symbols and narrative actions in the text, while also opening avenues for further research on the application of Barthes’s codes to other works and media.
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Vijaykumar R.H. (2026)Multiple mutations in Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase gene in phosphine resistant Rhyzopertha Dominica populations from IndiaMolecular Biology Reports, 53(1)
-
Singh S. (2026)AHP-Weighted multi-pollutant composite with Getis–Ord Gi* hotspot analysis from sentinel-5P over Rajasthan, IndiaJournal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 83(2)
-
Silva A. (2026)Improving rotor-casing rubbing detection performance with time-frequency domain-based accelerometer signal processing methodologiesResults in Engineering, 32
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Astuti, S. (2022). Pendekatan Semiotika Roland Barthes dalam Interpretasi Teks Sastra Kontemporer. Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora, 14(1), 45–57.
Badan Bahasa Kemdikbud. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (Ed. kelima). Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. Blackwell Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran (Edisi keempat). Pustaka Pelajar.
Fauziah, A., & Yuliani, R. (2020). Kritik Sosial dalam Cerpen Indonesia Modern: Analisis Wacana dan Semiotika. Jurnal Wacana Sastra, 10(2), 80–92.
Fitriyani, R., & Mulyadi, M. (2017). Analisis Kode Barthes dalam Cerpen Indonesia Modern. Jurnal Kajian Sastra, 5(2), 120–135.
Hoed, B. H. (2011). Semiotika dan Dinamika Sosial Budaya. Komunitas Bambu.
Hutcheon, L. (2013). A theory of parody: The teachings of twentieth-century art forms. University of Illinois Press.
Juanda. (2004). Teori Sastra. Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Makassar Press.
Kaelan. (2009). Filsafat Bahasa, Semiotika, dan Hermeneutika. Paradigma.
Kurniawan, E. (2001). Semiologi Roland Barthes. Tera Publications.
Lustyantie, N. (2012, Desember). Pendekatan Semiotik Model Roland Barthes dalam Karya Sastra Prancis. Makalah Seminar Nasional FIB UI, Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya, Universitas Indonesia.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nurhayati, D. (2019). Bahasa Konotatif dalam Cerpen Indonesia: Kajian Struktur dan Makna. Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra, 9(1), 33–42.
Pratiwi, A. (2020). Representasi Sosial dalam Teks Sastra: Perspektif Semiotik. Jurnal Penelitian Leksika, 14(2), 89–101.
Ramadhani, S. (2021). Denotasi–Konotasi sebagai Dua Tahap Pemaknaan dalam Teori Barthes. Jurnal Semiotika Nusantara, 3(1), 55–66.
Rohim, M. (2020). Adaptasi Karya Sastra ke Film Pendek: Analisis Estetika dan Resepsi Penonton. Jurnal Kajian Media, 6(2), 140–156.
Sasmita, F. (2018). Kritik Sosial dalam Cerpen Indonesia Modern: Pendekatan Stilistika dan Semiotika. Jurnal Wacana Sastra, 8(2), 110–123.
Setiawan, D. (2004). Kapita Selekta Kritik Sastra. BSID, Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Tim Dosen ISBD. (2004). Ilmu Sosial Budaya Dasar. Universitas Negeri Makassar Press.
Wijayanti, L. (2021). Pembacaan Semiotik terhadap Narasi Cerpen Indonesia. Jurnal Stilistika, 11(1), 25–38.






















