Konsep Bacaruik bagi Masyarakat Sumatera Barat The Concept of Bacaruik among the People of West Sumatra

Main Article Content

Gandhi Wira Azani
Zulian Fikry

Abstract

This study aims to explore the concept of bacaruik—a form of profanity in the Minangkabau language that includes vulgar references to female genitalia—as used in the daily life of communities in West Sumatra. Utilizing a qualitative approach grounded in Indigenous Psychology, data were collected through an open-ended online questionnaire completed by 176 native West Sumatran respondents (102 female, 74 male). Thematic analysis revealed that bacaruik is most frequently used as an outlet for emotional expression, particularly in situations of anger (80 respondents) and frustration (50 respondents), with 80.33% linking its usage to emotional contexts. Affectively, 60.67% reported experiencing negative emotions after using bacaruik, with the highest proportion among women (67.92%), while 24.71% felt relief or satisfaction, predominantly among men (33.33%). Although the majority (67.97%)—especially women (99.05%)—perceived bacaruik as useless, a minority (32.02%), almost entirely male, regarded it as beneficial for self-expression, strengthening social bonds, and defusing tension. These findings highlight a cultural paradox between Minangkabau customary norms, such as Kato nan Ampek, and everyday social practices. They also underscore bacaruik as a complex psychosociolinguistic phenomenon, reflecting the interplay of emotional dynamics, gender norms, and the negotiation of cultural values in contemporary society.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Azani, G. W., & Fikry, Z. (2025). Konsep Bacaruik bagi Masyarakat Sumatera Barat. TSAQOFAH, 5(6), 6562-6573. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v5i6.7788

References

Agus, R. (2020). Gender dan Etika Komunikasi dalam Budaya Minangkabau. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 14(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.15575/jsr.v14i2.8901
Andersson, L., & Trudgill, P. (1990). Bad Language. Penguin Books.
Anggito,A,& Setiawan,J.(2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif.Cv Jejak.
Awengki.(2017).Bentuk-bentuk Implementasi Nilai-nilai Kato Nan Ampek dalam Pasukuan Caniago di Jorong Tangkit Nagari Ampang Kuranji Kabupaten Dharmasraya. Prodi Sosiologi, STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat.
Aziz, M., & Fauzi, A. (2024). Norma Gender dalam Tutur Kata Masyarakat Minangkabau Kontemporer. Jurnal Psikologi Budaya, 8(1), 45–60.
Bergen, B. (2016). What the F: What Swearing Reveals About Our Language, Our Brains, and Ourselves. Basic Books.
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., & Pandey, J. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and Method (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Danesi, M. (2021). The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Digital Age. Bloomsbury Academic.
Dani, V.(2008). Filsafat Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar.Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Deswita, N., Putri, R., & Yulianti, D. (2018). Nomina Makian dalam Bahasa Minangkabau di Terminal Aua Kuniang Bukittinggi. E-Jurnal Sastra UNP, 7(2), 112–125.
Deswita,dkk. (2018). Nomina Makian dalam Bahasa Minangkabau di Terminal Aua Kuniang Bukittinggi. Prodi Sastra Indonesia,Universitas Negeri Padang. e-journal.unp.ac.id.
Geertz, C. (1960). The Religion of Java. University of Chicago Press.
Hefner, R. W. (1985). Hindu Javanese: Tengger Tradition and Islam. Princeton University Press.
Jay, T. (2000). Why We Curse: A Neuro-Psycho-Social Theory of Speech. John Benjamins Publishing.
Kemendikbud.(2020). info Bahasa. Daiakses Mei,01,2020 dari https://petabahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/infobahasa2.php?idb=15&idp=Sumatra%20Barat.
Kemendikbud.(2020). Peta Bahasa. Daiakses Mei,01,2020 dari https://petabahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/databahasa.php.
Kusmawati,T. (2016). Komunikasi Verbal dan Non-verbal. Jurnal pendidikan dan konseling : Al-irsyad,6(2),83-98,
Navis, A. A. (1984). Alam Terkembang Jadi Guru. PT Grafiti Pers.
Navis, A.A. 1984. Alam Terkembang jadi Guru. Jakarta: PT Grafiti Pers
Putra, R. R. (2023). Bahasa, Identitas, dan Norma Sosial di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 11(1), 77–92.
Putra,R,R.(2013). Bentuk dan Fungsi Kata Umpatan pada Komunikasi Informal di Kalangan Siswa SMA N 3 Surabaya : Kajian Sosiolinguistik. Journal Unair , 1(3) ,86-97.
Rachmat, J. (2013). Psikologi Komunikasi (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Stephens, R., Atkins, J., & Kingston, A. (2021). Swearing as a Response to Pain—Effect of Daily Habitual Swearing Frequency. NeuroReport, 32(4), 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001602
Takari, M. (2019). MEMAHAMI ILMU KOMUNIKASI.Fakultas Ilmu Budaya,Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Usmala & Mulyadi.(2019). Ungkapan dan Makna Makian dalam Bahasa Minang dan Batak: Studi Komperatif.. DIALEKTIKA : Journal bahasa ,sastra dan pendidikan bahasa dan sastra indonesia. 6(1), 2019, 80-94.
Usmala, F., & Mulyadi, Y. (2019). Ungkapan dan Makna Makian dalam Bahasa Minang dan Batak: Studi Komparatif. Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan, 6(1), 80–94.
Wajskop, G. (2022). Linguistic Taboos and Emotional Desensitization in Digital Communication. Language & Communication, 85, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.03.002
Wierzbicka, A. (2020). Experience, Evidence, and Sense: The Hidden Cultural Legacy of English. Oxford University Press

Find the perfect home for your research! If this journal isn't the right fit, don't worry—we offer a wide range of journals covering diverse fields of study. Explore our other journals to discover the ideal platform for your work and maximize its impact. Browse now and take the next step in publishing your research:

| HOME | Yasin | AlSys | Anwarul | Masaliq | Arzusin | Tsaqofah | Ahkam | AlDyas | Mikailalsys | Edumalsys | Alsystech | AJSTEA | AJECEE | AJISD | IJHESS | IJEMT | IJECS | MJMS | MJAEI | AMJSAI | AJBMBR | AJSTM | AJCMPR | AJMSPHR | KIJST | KIJEIT | KIJAHRS |