Metodologi Kontekstual dalam Tafsir Ayat Hukum: Studi Literatur atas Tafsir Klasik dan Kontemporer Contextual Methodology in the Interpretation of Legal Verses: A Literature Study of Classical and Contemporary Tafsir

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 3882-3895
Download PDF
Published: Sep 27, 2024
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i6.3877
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 613 times
Downloaded: 638 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Muhammad Ardi Kusumawardana1
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Muhammad Ardi Kusumawardana
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Az-Zain Sampang

Abstract

The interpretation of legal verses in the Qur'an undergoes significant methodological dynamics between classical and contemporary mufassirs, which raises issues of relevance and adaptability in the modern social context. This study aims to explore and compare contextual methodologies in the interpretation of legal verses between classical and contemporary periods. The method used is a literature study with a comparative analysis approach to classical interpretations such as Al-Tabari, Al-Qurtubi, and Ibn Kathir and contemporary interpretations such as Quraish Shihab and Abdullah Saeed. The results show that contemporary mufassirs more often use a contextual approach that considers current social and cultural dynamics, while classical mufassirs tend to use a literal textual approach. The findings support the hypothesis that contextual methodology is more relevant and adaptive to social change compared to classical textual methods. This research produces the "Contextual-Textual Tafsir Integration Theory" (CTIT) which offers a synthesis between textual and contextual approaches. The implication of this study is the need for integration between textual and contextual approaches to develop a more holistic and responsive tafsir methodology, which not only maintains the classical intellectual heritage but also meets the needs of modern society.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Langaji A. (2026)
    Reconstructing Marriageable Age in Tafsīr al-Aḥkām: A Comparative Uṣūliyyah Analysis of Tāj al-Dīn al-Subkī and Classical Madhhab Perspectives
    Mazahibuna Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 8(2), 229-252
  2. Al-Azani S. (2026)
    A comprehensive review of Artificial Intelligence in Qur’anic research: Trends, methods, challenges, and future directions
    Information Processing and Management, 63(7)
  3. Akın M. (2026)
    The Aesthetic Economy of Eloquence: Ellipsis (Ijaz-i Hazf) as a Stylistic Technique in Neshati’s Ghazals
    Osmanli Mirasi Arastirmalari Dergisi, 13(36), 407-430

Article Details

How to Cite
Kusumawardana, M. A. (2024). Metodologi Kontekstual dalam Tafsir Ayat Hukum: Studi Literatur atas Tafsir Klasik dan Kontemporer. TSAQOFAH, 4(6), 3882-3895. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i6.3877

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Abdoh, Asma, and Mohammed Abdullah. (2024). Clarify the Methodology of Imam Al-Nasir Li-Din Allah Al-Hasan Al-Mu’ayyad in His Interpretation of Thenarrations in His Book, The Certain Testament, an Interpretation of the Glorious Qur’an. Journal of Scientific Development for Studies and Research 5(17):42–55. doi: 10.61212/jsd/204.
Abedifar, P. (2023). Formalism versus purposivism in Islamic jurisprudence: the case of Islamic finance law. Religions, 14(4), 465.
Al-Ayyubi, M. Z. (2023). Penafsiran Kontekstual Abdullah Saeed (Metodologi Dan Aplikasi Pada Ayat Jilbab). Rausyan Fikr, 19(2023).
AlJahsh, I., & Ahmad, M. (2023). INFLUENCE OF CULTURAL CONTEXT ON QUR’ĀNIC TRANSLATION: ANALYZING SOCIAL JUSTICE INTERPRETATIONS IN SURA AN-NISĀ’VERSE 58. Ma'alim Quran Sunnah, 19(2).
Ilham, M., Saputra, A. T., & Syatar, A. (2023). Abdullah Saeed's Construction of the Hierarchy of Values in the Qur’ān: A Philosophical Hermeneutic Perspective. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 13(1), 119-132..
Becker-Haimes, E. M., Ramesh, B., Buck, J. E., Nuske, H. J., Zentgraf, K. A., Stewart, R. E., ... & Mandell, D. S. (2022). Comparing output from two methods of participatory design for developing implementation strategies: traditional contextual inquiry vs. rapid crowd sourcing. Implementation Science, 17(1), 46.
Canali, S. (2020). Towards a contextual approach to data quality. Data, 5(4), 90.
Fadholi, A. (2022). Sejarah Dan Dinamika Pemikiran Hukum Islam. ASY SYAR'IYYAH: JURNAL ILMU SYARI'AH DAN PERBANKAN ISLAM, 7(2), 295-309.
Hay, P. (2020). Current approach to eating disorders: a clinical update. Internal medicine journal, 50(1), 24-29.
Ibrahim, M. (2022). The Legal Intentions of the Contemporary Interpreters of the Holly verses. Islamic Sciences Journal, 13(1), 297-320.
Irsyadunnas, I., & Nurmahni, N. (2020). Rekonstruksi Tafsir Al-Quran Kontemporer (Studi Analisis Sumber Dan Metode Tafsir). Substantia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 22(1), 21-36.
Mustafa, K. A. R. A., & SALEH, M. H. Tefsir Araştırmaları Dergisi The Journal of Tafsīr Studies.
Karabukayeva, A., Hearld, L. R., Kelly, R., Hall, A., & Singh, J. (2022). Association between the number of adopted implementation strategies and contextual determinants: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1518.
AN, A. N., Arfan, F., Marshal, F. D., Maulana, C., & Fadli, N. (2024). Methods of Qur'an Research and Quran Tafseer Research its implications for contemporary Islamic thought:(Metodologi Tafsir Al-Qur'an). Bulletin of Islamic Research, 2(1), 33-42.
Rochimah, N., Maghfuri, N., & Rahmawati, Y. D. (2024). Potret Seorang Mufassir Tabi’in: Mujahid bin Jabir dan Kitab Tafsirnya. Al Furqan: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir, 7(1), 18-36.
Rogers, L., De Brún, A., & McAuliffe, E. (2020). Defining and assessing context in healthcare implementation studies: a systematic review. BMC health services research, 20, 1-24.
Alwana, H. A. (2020). Aliran Pemikiran Ushul Fiqh Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pendekatan Hukum Islam. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 19(2), 147-62.
Wahyudi, A. I., Haq, M. R. M., & Said, H. A. (2023). THE RICHNESS OF TAFSIR AL-QUR’ AN: METHODS IN INTERPRETING THE VERSES OF THE QUR'AN. Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika, 20(1), 155-178..
Yilmaz, R., Löschnigg, G., Arslan, H., & Içbay, M. A. (Eds.). (2015). Current approaches in social sciences. PL Academic Research..
Basirun, B., Ajepri, F., & Jemain, Z. (2023). Pendekatan Tektual Kontekstual dan Hemenuetika dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur'an. DIMAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 259-280.
Zain, M. F., & Zayyadi, A. (2023). Measuring islamic legal philosophy and Islamic Law: a Study of differences, typologies, and objects of study. El-Aqwal: Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law, 1-12.