The Resolution of Criminal Offenses through Customary Law from a Restorative Justice Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
Customary settlement of criminal offenses is an established conflict resolution practice in Indonesian society that shares key features with restorative justice. This study examined its legal framework within the Indonesian legal system, its relationship with restorative justice principles, and the limits of its application concerning legal certainty and victims’ rights. Normative legal research was conducted using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The analysis identifies a constitutional basis for recognizing customary law in Article 18B(2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, alongside its recognition under Article 2 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. Customary settlement aligns with restorative justice insofar as it emphasizes deliberation, reparation for victims, offender accountability, and the restoration of social relationships. Its application must nevertheless comply with statutory limits and uphold legal certainty, victims’ rights, and human rights. The study concludes that customary settlement may serve as a complementary mechanism for resolving criminal offenses with a restorative orientation where permitted by national law, provided that participation is voluntary and the process is non-discriminatory. These findings clarify the importance of aligning customary dispute resolution with legal safeguards to reconcile community-based restoration with the protection of individual rights.
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Zhu Y. (2027)Microplastics: health risks, human exposure characteristics, and advanced degradation technologiesNano Transmed, 6
-
Paul Shourov K. (2027)Critical review of tools and techniques for predicting microplastics pollution in watershed runoffEnvironmental Pollution and Management, 4, 27-47
-
Zhang J. (2027)Spectrally Partitioned All-Optical Memristors for Highly Linear Neuromorphic Vision SystemsNano Micro Letters, 19(1)
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ahmad, Fachrurrazy, M., Hartati S, S. Y., Amalia, M., Fauzi, E., Lumban Gaol, S., Siliwadi, D. N., & Takdir. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian & Penulisan Hukum. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia. https://buku.sonpedia.com/2024/04/buku-ajar-metode-penelitian-penulisan.html
Arief, B. N. (2017). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Kencana.
Arifin, F., Astawa, I. G. P., Maarif, I., Sulastri, D., & Abdullah, M. K. (2025). Recognition of customary norms within the framework of Indonesian legal positivism. Khazanah Hukum, 7(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i1.39409
Ariyanto, Y. A., & Anwar, S. (2026). Perbandingan Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana melalui Hukum Adat antara Masyarakat Adat Indonesia dan Māori di Selandia Baru. Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal, 3(6), 4160–4166. https://ipssj.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/1581
Danial, M. A., Muhadar, & Ratnawati. (2022). Pelaksanaan Perja Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal Pro Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 11(1), 15–24. https://journal.unigres.ac.id/index.php/JurnalProHukum/article/view/1699
Faisal, & Anwar, R. (2024). Legalitas Hukum Adat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nasional. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 13(2), 366–383. https://repository.ubb.ac.id/id/eprint/11099/
Fatmawati, I., Fikri, R. A., & Siregar, M. A. (2023). Peradilan Adat dan Restoratif dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Tahta Media Group. https://tahtamedia.co.id/issj/article/view/323
Fulham, L., Blais, J., Rugge, T., & Schultheis, E. A. (2025). The effectiveness of restorative justice programs: A meta-analysis of recidivism and other relevant outcomes. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 25(5), 1486–1512. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231215228
Gunardi, G. (2022). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Damera Press. https://repository.untar.ac.id/id/eprint/38704/
Halawa, D. (2025). Hukum Adat sebagai Instrumen Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Masyarakat sebagai Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional. Rio Law Jurnal, 6(2), 966–975.
Hardinanto, A., Fernando, Z. J., Sabrina, N., Putra, E. N., & Sumardiana, B. (2026). Customary council decisions as grounds for the elimination of prosecution: Notes on the Criminal Procedure Code. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 11(1), 1–42. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/ijcls/article/view/31803
Jaelani, A. (2023). Application of the restorative justice concept in the process of resolving Ngata Toro customary crimes.
Mamahit, H. I., Sahay, T., & Pramita, C. Y. (2026). Implementasi Nilai Keadilan Restoratif dalam Hukum Adat Indonesia. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(2), 6033–6044.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.
Ramadhan, M. A., & Syahfrudin, M. A. (2023). Implementasi dan Harmonisasi Norma Hukum Adat dan Hukum Nasional di Indonesia. Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, dan Humaniora, 1(5), 204–217. https://jurnal.kolibi.org/index.php/kultura/article/view/546
Ramadhanti, S. N., Nurensa, A., & Rianto, S. A. (2022). Konsep Restorative Justice dalam Perbandingan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dengan Hukum Islam. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(4), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v1i4.533
Siregar, M. S., Sukti, S., & Ihsan, R. N. (2026). Peran Lembaga Adat Dayak dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Asusila Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Jurnal USM Law Review, 9(2), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i2.13989
Siregar, M. V. M. N., Siswanto, H., Muhtadi, Tisnanta, H. S., & Amrullah, R. (2026). Peace through restorative justice: Substantive parameters of restitution in the resolution of criminal cases. Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 7(2), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v7i2.6893
Sumartono, A., & Tanjung, A. (2026). Integrasi Keadilan Restoratif dan Living Law dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana pada Masyarakat Adat Kabupaten Gunung Mas. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 5(2), 1543–1554. https://doi.org/10.59066/ijoms.v5i2.2700
Sumaya, P. S. (2024). Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Hukum Adat di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(2), 1136–1143. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3308
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024). Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024 concerning guidelines for adjudicating criminal cases based on restorative justice. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/storage/uploads/produk_hukum/2024/2024perma001.pdf
Suryanto, A. (2023). Integration of the concept of restorative justice with local wisdom in law enforcement in Indonesia. Journal of Legal and Social Reform, 11(3), 241–258.
Taqiuddin, H. U., & Risdiana. (2022). Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) dalam Praktik Ketatanegaraan. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v6i1.2972
Widjajanto, A., Astawa, I. G. P., & Rulyandi, M. (2025). Decolonising restorative justice in Indonesia: A comparative study across customary law traditions. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(2), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i2.40481
Wijaya, I. M. O. (2022). Restorative Justice dalam Tinjauan Hukum Progresif: Eksistensi dan Implikasi. Indonesia Berdaya, 3(3), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2022297



