Reconstructing the Concept of Sulh as a Restorative Justice Model in Contemporary Islamic Criminal Law

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The growing adoption of restorative justice in contemporary criminal justice systems has intensified scholarly interest in dispute resolution models that are humane, participatory, and oriented toward repairing harm. Within Islamic criminal law, ṣulḥ constitutes a conflict resolution mechanism that shares substantial conceptual affinities with restorative justice; however, its reconstruction as a contemporary restorative justice model remains insufficiently examined. This study aims to analyze the concept of ṣulḥ in Islamic criminal law, identify its relevance to restorative justice, and reconstruct its application in accordance with the requirements of modern criminal justice systems. Employing a qualitative library research approach, the study draws on the Qur’an, Hadith, classical Islamic jurisprudential literature, scholarly books, journal articles, and other relevant academic sources. The data were analyzed through content analysis and a descriptive-analytical framework grounded in maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. The findings demonstrate that ṣulḥ incorporates the principal elements of restorative justice, including dialogue, reconciliation, forgiveness, victim restitution, offender accountability, and the restoration of social relationships. Its contemporary reconstruction may be pursued by strengthening victims’ participation, optimizing penal mediation, and integrating considerations of public welfare (maṣlaḥah) into modern criminal justice practices. The study concludes that ṣulḥ has substantial potential to serve as a restorative justice model in contemporary Islamic criminal law by integrating Islamic legal principles with modern approaches to justice centered on peacebuilding, harm reparation, and social restoration. These findings contribute to Islamic criminal law scholarship by providing a conceptual framework for adapting classical reconciliation mechanisms to contemporary criminal justice contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Citation data unavailable
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Berenjian K. (2027)
    Impact of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) on CYP2D6 Activity and the Restorative Effects of Melatonin and Vitamin C Supplementation
    Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 26(1)
  2. Mo G. (2027)
    A biomimetic gradient multiscale Ti/HA scaffold reconcile load-bearing mechanics and multifunctionality: An in vitro proof-of-concept
    Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 280, 166-176
  3. Shi X.(. (2027)
    Artificial intelligence-based employee selection in tourism and hospitality: Justice, inclusion, and gender differences in resume screening and interviews
    Tourism Management, 118

Article Details

How to Cite
Pulungan, M., Lubis, A. D., Rinaldi, N., & Ilyas, M. (2026). Reconstructing the Concept of Sulh as a Restorative Justice Model in Contemporary Islamic Criminal Law. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(2), 3856-3869. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i2.11276

References

Albab, U., & Harmoko. (2025). Philosophical reconstruction of restorative justice in Indonesia: An analysis of procedural asymmetry in the perspective of Maqaṣid al-Syari’ah. Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 10(2), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v10i2.7822

Asnawi, M. N., Putra, I. B. Y., Multazam, M., & Suparta, W. (2026). Keadilan Restoratif dari Perspektif Filsafat Hukum Progresif: Merekonstruksi Paradigma Penegakan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum, 6(6), 1866–1874. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i06.2049

Azisa, N., Muin, A. M., Munandar, M. A., Mukhlis, M. M., & Rahman, A. A. (2025). Psychological recovery of crime victims within contemporary restorative justice: An Islamic legal perspective. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1098–1127. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11184

Feriandref, A. C., Ermala, E., Ballan, O., Mubaraq, M., & Aryadi, D. (2026). Transformasi Tujuan Pemidanaan di Indonesia: Systematic Literature Review Mengenai Perkembangan Teori, Kebijakan, dan Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif di Era Baru Hukum Pidana. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 7(1), 22–33. https://jurnal.bundamediagrup.co.id/index.php/iuris/article/view/1155

Flora, H. S. (2025). Restorative Justice dan Hukum Penitensier: Reorientasi Pemasyarakatan Menuju Keadilan Berkeadaban. Terbit Raja Buku.

Ginting, Y. P. (2025). Reformasi Hukum Pidana Seksual dan Pergeseran Paradigma Perlindungan Korban. Penerbit K-Media.

Hakeem, M. A. G., Valentara, A. B., Faidzuddin, A., & Rilya, M. A. A. (2026). Telaah Filsafat Hukum terhadap Restorative Justice sebagai Upaya Dekonstruksi Paradigma Retributif dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 4(1), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17851225

Hamzah, G., & Syamsuddin, S. (2022). Restorative Justice dalam Ayat Pidana Pembunuhan Pendekatan Hermeneutika Ma’nā-Cum-Magzā. Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi), 8(2), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.18784/smart.v8i2.1678

Hasan, H., Bora, M. A., Afriani, D., Artiani, L. E., Puspitasari, R., Susilawati, A., Dewi, P. M., Asroni, A., Yunesman, Merjani, A., & Hakim, A. R. (2025). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.

Herlangga, D. (2025). Sulh dalam Fikih Jinayah: Basis Teoretis untuk Restorative Justice dan Diversi dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan. Jurnal Edukasi Al-Amanah, 1(1), 1–6.

Irawan, F. B., Marwiyah, S., & Amiq, B. (2026). Konsep Restorative Justice dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Cyberbullying di Indonesia. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 5(3), 5949–5958. https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v5i3.15990

Junaedi, J., Dimyathi, M. A., Aswadi, A., Syafi’i, I., & Tutik, T. T. (2026). Tafsir tarbawi of restorative justice in Qur’anic jinayat verses: Nahdlatul Ulama pesantren perspective. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v9i1.470

Khamim, K., Rizal, M. C., & Mustakim, A. A. (2025). Convergence of restorative justice and al-‘afwu: Reforming criminal procedure law in Indonesia. Justicia Islamica, 22(2), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v22i2.9807

Khasanah, N., Putri, S. A., Wulandari, V., Saiin, A., & Idris, M. (2026). Integrating restorative justice and the principle of islah in the reform of Indonesia’s criminal justice system. NALAR FIQH: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.30631/nf.v17i1.2178

Kholid, M., Achmad, & Leliya. (2026). Restorative justice efforts in resolving domestic violence crimes from the perspective of positive law and Islamic law. Journal of Islamic Communication and Counseling, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18196/jicc.v5i1.119

Marzuqin, M. A., Saini, Safithri, A., & Miftahussurur, W. (2025). Judicial reconciliation in family disputes: The role of the judge as muslih in Al-Mawardi’s thought. LexIslamica: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Islamic Law and its Contemporary Applications, 1(2).

Maula, R. (2026). Analisis Pembiayaan Modal UMKM dengan Akad Murabahah di BMT Al Bahjah Cirebon Perspektif Fatwa DSN-MUI No. 04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 tentang Murabahah [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon]. https://repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id/18111/

Meliala, I. M., Noor, S., & Kristanto, K. (2026). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana: Teori, Praktik, dan Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Najib, M. A., & Ezbeyda, H. A. M. (2025). Restorative justice in the Indonesian legal system: Perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah. Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum, 6(4), 433–454. https://jurnalfsh.uinsa.ac.id/mhs/index.php/mal/article/view/434

Nartin, Faturrahman, Deni, A., Santoso, Y. H., Paharuddin, Suacana, I. W. G., Indrayani, E., Utama, F. Y., Tarigan, W. J., & Eliyah. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yayasan Cendikia Mulia Mandiri.

Nashir, M. A., Harefa, S., & Ghufron, M. (2025). Implementation of restorative justice in the criminal act of arisan fraud in the perspective of Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah and sulh. Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 11(1), 94–124. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2025.11.1.94-124

Nasution, T. A. S., & Lubis, Z. (2026). Between reconciliation and justice: Reactualizing as-sulḥ in resolving juvenile violence within Indonesia’s legal pluralism. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam, 11(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.30863/ajmpi.v11i2.11560

Niam, M. F., Rumahlewang, E., Umiyati, H., Dewi, N. P. S., Atiningsih, S., Haryati, T., Magfiroh, I. S., Anggraini, R. I., Mamengko, R. P., Fathin, S., Mola, M. S. R., Syaifudin, A. A., & Wajdi, F. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Widina Media Utama.

Purba, R. J. (2023). Rekonstruksi Regulasi Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Berbasis Keadilan Pancasila [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung]. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/31002/

Purnomo, H., Handoko, W., & Altwaiqat, M. (2026). Reframing medical malpractice resolution: Restorative justice between Indonesian criminal law and iṣlāḥ in contemporary Islamic law. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 5(1), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13100

Putri, D. A. (2025). Analisis Hukum Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama Kota Cirebon pada Tahun 2021–2024 Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif [Undergraduate thesis, UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon]. https://repository.syekhnurjati.ac.id/18110/

Rusydianta, M. (2025). Perkembangan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif dalam Berbagai Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Peradaban Kuno dan Barat untuk Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Materiil di Masa Mendatang [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/56363

Sari, G. N. A., Pramudita, W. S. D., Muhklasin, R. M., Sulistianingsih, D., & Martitah. (2024). Tinjauan Filosofis Keadilan Restoratif dalam Lensa Teori Keadilan. In Hukum dan Politik dalam Berbagai Perspektif (Vol. 3, pp. 253–291). https://doi.org/10.15294/hp.v3i1.210

Sari, N. P., Widyoza, M. A., Wulandari, Y. M., Zahara, T., & Renindita. (2026). Reorientasi Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Analisis Penologi antara Pendekatan Retributif dan Restoratif. Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 2(3), 649–653. https://jurnal.globalscients.com/index.php/jkhpk/article/view/1227

Sihombing, L. A. (2024). Restorative Justice, Kejahatan, Hukuman, dan Peradilan Pidana: Sebuah Analisis Kesejarahan, Peluang, dan Tantangan. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8902–8911. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1777

Situmeang, S. M. T., & Meilan, K. (2025). Evolusi Kejahatan dan Pemidanaan: Tantangan dalam Penegakan Hukum dan Penologi Modern. Res Nullius Law Journal, 7(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v7i2.15913

Subhan. (2025). Perubahan pada Tradisi Nikahan Suku Lembak di Kota Bengkulu Perspektif Moderasi Beragama [Doctoral dissertation, UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu]. https://repository.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/4952/

Sueni, A. S. (2025). Delik terhadap Kehormatan: Pencemaran. In C. Imelda (Ed.), Delik-Delik dalam KUHP: Klasifikasi, Unsur, dan Analisis Yuridis (p. 29). CV Gita Lentera.

Sulistiyo, U. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Salim Media Indonesia.

Sutanti, R. D., Simamora, J. T. M., Al Karima, P. Z., & Aryaputra, M. I. (2026). Pidana Pengawasan dalam KUHP Nasional sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan Berbasis Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal USM Law Review, 9(2), 1042–1062. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i2.14027

Tampubolon, M. (2023). Metode Penelitian. PT Global Eksekutif Teknologi.

Taufikurahman, R., & Saputro, T. A. (2025). Synergy between customary and Islamic law: The transformation of restorative justice in the Aceh judicial system. Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity), 1525–1533. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/iseth/article/view/6956

Ulfiati, N. S. (2026). Restorative justice in the criminal justice system: A normative analysis from the perspective of Islamic law. Al-Muntadā: Journal of Humaniora and Sciences, 2(1), 17–24. https://jurnal-jams.or.id/index.php/Al-Muntada/article/view/132

Utami, F. R., Anggraeniko, L. S., & Ambarwati, A. (2026). Perlindungan Korban dalam Kerangka Keadilan Restoratif pada Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Nasional. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v6i1.895

Wicaksana, V. W., & Januarsyah, M. P. Z. (2025). Kebijakan Pembaruan Hukum Pidana tentang Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam KUHP Nasional: Perspektif Tujuan Pemidanaan. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(2), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11092


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.