The Identification of Public Values on the Winning-Public Service Innovations: Case Study of the United Nations Public Service Awards Winner in 2015-2024

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Although public value and public service innovation have received substantial attention in public administration research, limited scholarship has systematically examined the public values embedded in internationally recognized service innovations. This study aimed to identify and synthesize the public values reflected in innovations recognized by the United Nations Public Service Awards (UNPSA) between 2015 and 2024 and to develop a comprehensive Public Values Framework. A qualitative descriptive approach with a multiple-case study design was employed, involving 97 UNPSA award-winning public service innovations selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected from official UNPSA documents, government reports, and relevant scholarly publications using a structured document analysis protocol. Document analysis was integrated with thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s six-stage framework, while data-source triangulation was used to enhance the credibility of the findings. The analysis identified four major dimensions of public value: Outcome Achievement, Trust and Legitimacy, Service Delivery Quality, and Efficiency. Across these dimensions, Fairness, Equity, Adaptability, Stakeholder Value, Innovation, and Citizens’ Involvement emerged as the most prominent values. The findings demonstrate that successful public service innovations create public value not only by improving administrative performance but also by promoting inclusive governance, citizen participation, organizational adaptability, and collaborative stakeholder engagement. This study advances Public Value Theory by integrating innovation typology with multidimensional public value analysis and by proposing a comprehensive framework for examining value creation in public service innovation. Practically, the framework provides governments and public managers with guidance for designing and evaluating citizen-centered innovations and establishes a foundation for future comparative and mixed-methods research on public value creation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Citation data unavailable
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Khabiyev A.T. (2027)
    Use of Industrial By-products from Metallurgical Production for the Development of Heat-Resistant Building Mixes and their Molding in an Improved Device
    Kompleksnoe Ispolzovanie Mineralnogo Syra, 341(2), 16-26
  2. Asl S.B. (2027)
    Uncertainty estimation in earthquake magnitude determination using high-rate GPS data with Bootstrap method
    Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 20(3), 187-203
  3. Nagano K. (2027)
    The Importance of the Gel Immersion Method to Successfully Identify the Jejunojejunal Anastomosis Site After Roux-Y Reconstruction With Double-Balloon Enteroscopy-assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Case Report
    Den Open, 7(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Kallyndra, M. N. (2026). The Identification of Public Values on the Winning-Public Service Innovations: Case Study of the United Nations Public Service Awards Winner in 2015-2024. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(2), 3348-3376. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i2.11201

References

Aprila, D., Andriani, W., & Ananto, R. P. (2023). Financial Management of Nagari Owned Enterprises (BUMNAG) and Its Impact on Community Welfare. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v16i2.4461
Aprila, D., & Dwiharyadi, A. (2026). Big Data Integration in Auditing: Technological, Institutional, and Ethical Perspectives. Invoice: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 8(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.26618/3nxvcp77
Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Georgetown University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brilhante, L., & Romero, F. (2025). Open Innovation in the Public Sector. Procedia Computer Science, 263, 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.07.075
Casalini, F., & Zavolokina, L. (2025). From private platforms to public value: An exploratory analysis of privately-owned public service digital platforms in Italy. Government Information Quarterly, 42(4), 102090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102090
Chen, J., Walker, R. M., & Sawhney, M. (2020). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1674–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874
Cinar, E., Demircioglu, M. A., Acik, A. C., & Simms, C. (2024). Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore. Research Policy, 53(2), 104915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104915
Cinar, E., Simms, C., & Trott, P. (2023). Collaborative public sector innovation: An analysis of Italy, Japan, and Turkey. Governance, 36(2), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12673
Conteh, C., & Harding, B. (2023). Boundary-spanning in public value co-creation through the lens of multilevel governance. Public Management Review, 25(1), 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1942529
Fukumoto, E., & Bozeman, B. (2019). Public Values Theory: What Is Missing? The American Review of Public Administration, 49(6), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018814244
Guenduez, A. A., Demircioglu, M. A., Mueller, E. M., & Cinar, E. (2025). Digital innovation strategies in the public sector. Research Policy, 54(8), 105274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105274
Hajar, S., & Arma, N. A. (2024). Co-creating public value into digital-based public service innovation in the village governance. Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 14(3), 516–538. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v14i3.15891
Hendriks, F. (2022). Key values for democratic governance innovation: Two traditions and a synthesis. Public Administration, 100(4), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12738
Junior, J. A. de L., Santos, K. da G., & Neto, J. da S. C. (2024). The use of the open innovation paradigm in the public sector: a systematic review of published studies. Journal Computers and Society, 2(VI), 1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.01552
Luthfia, A. R., & Alkhajar, E. N. S. (2025). The Dilemma of Public Service Innovation in Enhancing Public Value. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(3), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijss.v2i3.581
Mišić, J., van Est, R., & Kool, L. (2025). Good governance of public sector AI: a combined value framework for good order and a good society. AI and Ethics, 5(5), 4875–4889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00751-3
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press.
Mousa, M., Althalathini, D., & Puhakka, V. (2025). When Grand Societal Challenges Stimulate the Creation of Public Value: A Study of Nurses in a Non-Western Public Healthcare Sector. Public Administration and Development, 45(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2093
Mukhtar. (2013). Metode Praktis Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif. GP Press Group.
O’Flynn, J. (2007). From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x
Ojasalo, J., & Kauppinen, S. (2024). Public Value in Public Service Ecosystems. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 36(2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2022.2133063
Osborne, S. P., Powell, M., Cui, T., & Strokosch, K. (2022). Value Creation in the Public Service Ecosystem: An Integrative Framework. Public Administration Review, 82(4), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13474
Peng, H. (2025). Spontaneous Public Value Co-Creation in Open Professional Topic-Based Digital Spaces: A Multicase Study of French Public Professionals’ Open Digital Collaboration. Public Administration and Development, 45(3), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2101
Rahardjo, M. (2017). Studi Kasus dalam Penelitian Kualitatif: Konsep dan Prosedurnya. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.
Saryono. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan: Penuntun Praktis Bagi Pemula. Mitra Cendekia Press.
Simanulang, L., & Pramudya, A. (2021). Public Service Innovation in Enhancing Government Transparency and Accountability. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 11(2), 617–622. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v11i2.45359
Syafira, Z., & Siahaan, A. Y. S. (2024). Public Sector Innovation Through Web Marriage Management Information System. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 14(1), 321. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v14i1.62059
Thabit, S., Sancino, A., & Mora, L. (2025). Strategic public value(s) governance: A systematic literature review and framework for analysis. Public Administration Review, 85(3), 885–906. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13877
Wahyudi, A. (2016). Value-added in Public Service Innovation: the Practice at Integrated Service Units in Pontianak Municipality and Tanah Bumbu District. Jurnal Bina Praja, 8(1), 180–181. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.08.2016.49-58

Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.