Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: Context-Sensitive Approaches to Local Government Improvement in Developing Countries
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
4746-4772
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11605
Viewed: 10 times
Downloaded: 5 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Rahmat Aminullah Muhadli1*, Harry Nenobais2, Johanna Novita3
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although context-sensitive approaches to local governance have received increasing attention in development studies and comparative public administration, research integrating structural, relational, and normative dimensions across developing-country contexts remains limited. This study aimed to examine how contextual conditions shape local government improvement and to develop an integrative theoretical framework explaining variations in local governance outcomes across developing countries. A qualitative comparative theoretical synthesis was conducted using the literature compiled by de Vries, Reddy, and Haque (2008), supplemented by relevant empirical and theoretical studies published between 2008 and 2023. The analysis encompassed evidence from Latin America, Sub-Saharan Africa, and South Asia and focused on three interrelated dimensions: structural conditions, relational dynamics, and normative conditions. The findings indicate that formal decentralization does not automatically produce equivalent improvements in local government capacity or performance. Instead, governance outcomes vary according to fiscal and administrative capacity, intergovernmental relations, territorial and institutional configurations, citizen participation, and the involvement of non-state actors. The synthesis further demonstrates that community-centred, state-centred, market-centred, radical, and network perspectives each explain important yet partial dimensions of local governance. Integrating these perspectives, the study proposes a multi-centred theory of local governance that combines local autonomy and accountability, context-sensitive central oversight, conditional market mechanisms, multi-actor collaboration, and sensitivity to institutional and territorial conditions. The study concludes that local government improvement requires governance reforms adapted to specific political, institutional, social, fiscal, and territorial contexts rather than the uniform replication of standardized best practices. This study contributes an integrative framework for comparative local governance research and provides practical guidance for policymakers and development institutions in designing context-sensitive decentralization and local government reforms. Future research should empirically test and refine the proposed framework across a broader range of local government settings.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Azhand A. (2027)Teaching Persian derivational affixes to non-Persian speakers from a Cognitive Morphology Approach: A case study of nominal suffixes (kar, gar, ban, baz, -ande)Language Related Research, 17(4), 469-497
-
Mirhaji H.R. (2027)The Arabic Language from a Semantic Perspective An Inquiry into Essentialism and Nominalism in Words and StructuresLanguage Related Research, 17(4), 499-535
-
Naemi Z. (2027)The Relationship between Second Language Learning Strategies, Learning Engagement, and Writing Skill in the Arabic Writing CurriculumLanguage Related Research, 17(4), 331-360
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Sugiantiningsih, A. A. P., Gusmao, F. D., Hidayaturrahman, M., & Jailani, S. (2026). When electoral decentralization fails: Elite capture and the limits of welfare governance in Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 13(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v13i2.30955
Andriani, W. (2023). Factors influencing local government financial performance. Ekonomi, Keuangan, Investasi dan Syariah (EKUITAS), 4(3), 951–959. https://doi.org/10.47065/ekuitas.v4i3.3094
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Aprila, D., Andriani, W., & Ananto, R. P. (2023). Financial management of Nagari-owned enterprises (BUMNag) and its impact on community welfare. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v16i2.4461
Aprila, D., Biswan, A. T., & Darapalgia, N. K. M. (2026). Analisis Permasalahan Penerapan ISAK 16 dalam Pengakuan Aset Konsesi pada Perusahaan Jasa Kepelabuhan dan Pengerukan (Studi Kasus pada Audit KAP XYZ). Accounting Information System, Taxes and Auditing Journal (AISTA Journal), 5(1), 48–57.
Aprila, D., & Dwiharyadi, A. (2026). Big data integration in auditing: Technological, institutional, and ethical perspectives. Invoice: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 8(1), 88–102. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/invoice/article/view/21394
Aprila, D., Surbakti, L. P., & Biswan, A. T. (2026). Dinamika Interaksi Auditor–Manajemen dalam Pemanfaatan Informasi Akuntansi untuk Pengendalian Strategis Persediaan. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 8(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v8i1.4017
Faguet, J.-P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035
Gupta, A., & Sharma, A. K. (2023). The role of institutional and governance factors in public–private partnerships infrastructure investments in emerging economies. Journal of Public Affairs, 23(4), Article e2874. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2874
Karim, N., Rohayati, W., & Maisyarah, N. D. (2026). Grassroots community movement towards new province formation and city development in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 13(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v13i1.27198
Kauneckis, D., & Andersson, K. (2009). Making decentralization work: A cross-national examination of local governments and natural resource governance in Latin America. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-008-9036-6
Koelble, T. A., & Siddle, A. (2014). Institutional complexity and unanticipated consequences: The failure of decentralization in South Africa. Democratization, 21(6), 1117–1133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.784270
Lewis, B. D. (2017). Does local government proliferation improve public service delivery? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(8), 1047–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1323544
Meilinda, S. D., Apriyani, A., Rozie, A., & Hendayana. (2025). Community empowerment in local government decision making: A systematic review of models and implementation. J-3P (Jurnal Pembangunan Pemberdayaan Pemerintahan), 10(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.33701/j-3p.v10i2.5866
Nomaini, F., Nisyak, H., & Santoso, A. D. (2022). Managing the COVID-19 pandemic in a fragmented local government setting: A study from Ogan Ilir Regency, Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v9i1.12301
Novita, J., Nenobais, H., & Octaviani, S. L. (2026). Colonial legacy and strategic HRM in Indonesia’s civil service: A Southeast Asian comparison. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS, 4(3), 4196–4214. https://doi.org/10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i3.11378
Pabayo, A. S. T. (2025). Impact of fiscal decentralization policy on regional fiscal independence in Indonesia. Journal of Local Government Issues, 8(1), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v8i1.37646
Pritchett, L., Woolcock, M., & Andrews, M. (2013). Looking like a state: Techniques of persistent failure in state capability for implementation. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2012.709614
Rahmadhani, P., Apriwan, A., & Setyaka, V. (2023). Perubahan Kebijakan Luar Negeri Amerika Serikat dalam Mengatasi Imigran Ilegal di Perbatasan dengan Meksiko. Politics, Humanities, Laws, International Relations and Social Journal, 2(2), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.25077/palito.2.2.39-53.2023
Rahmadhani, P., Perwita, A. A. B., & Ramsi, O. (2025). Building regional readiness: Indonesia’s leadership in enhancing AHA Centre’s disaster response capabilities. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 3(3), 907–928. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v3i3.6951
Rudianto, H. (2026). Regional autonomy at the crossroad: Between decentralization, recentralization, and local governance innovation in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Suara Khatulistiwa, 11(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.33701/jipsk.v11i1.6157
Setiawan, A., Tjiptoherijanto, P., Mahi, B. R., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2022). The impact of local government capacity on public service delivery: Lessons learned from decentralized Indonesia. Economies, 10(12), Article 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120323
Smoke, P. (2015a). Managing public sector decentralization in developing countries: Moving beyond conventional recipes. Public Administration and Development, 35(4), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1736
Smoke, P. (2015b). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1703
Sugiyono. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suminar, S. H., Perwita, A. A. B., & Ramsi, O. (2025). Hedging through defense diplomacy: Indonesia’s non-alignment in the age of emerging technologies. Asian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Art, 3(4), 1340–1355. https://doi.org/10.58578/ajstea.v3i4.7112
Sutrisno, E., Reza, I. F., Wati, N. K., & Gashimov, E. (2024). Prefectural system practices in the Indonesian local government. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i3.20224
Swapan, M. S. H. (2016). Who participates and who doesn’t? Adapting community participation model for developing countries. Cities, 53, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.013
United Nations Development Programme. (2008). The UNDP accountability system: Accountability framework and oversight policy. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/635594/files/DP_2008_16_Rev.1-EN.pdf
Waddington, H., Sonnenfeld, A., Finetti, J., Gaarder, M., John, D., & Stevenson, J. (2019). Citizen engagement in public services in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review of participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) initiatives. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1–2), Article e1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1025
West, K. J. (2015). Decentralization, the inclusion of ethnic citizens, and support for democracy in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 50(3), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2015.0045
Willis, E., Garman, C. da C. B., & Haggard, S. (1999). The politics of decentralization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 34(1), 7–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100024298