The Perspective of ‘Urf on the Implementation of the Ba Iyeh Tradition in Marriage Customs in Padang Pariaman Regency
Main Article Content
Abstract
Local marriage traditions continue to shape the relationship between customary practice, religious belief, and community identity in Minangkabau society. However, research specifically examining the Ba Iyeh tradition in Nagari Tapakih from the perspective of ‘urf remains limited. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Ba Iyeh in marriage customs and examine its position within Islamic legal reasoning through the concept of ‘urf. An empirical qualitative approach with field research was employed, involving religious leaders, customary leaders, and community members selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews and documentation and analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis based on the concept of ‘urf. The findings indicate that Ba Iyeh begins with mandi balimau or mandi kembang, followed by incense smoke, the application of pauweah, mantra recitation, symbolic hair cutting near the crown of the head, and doa paga diri before the bride or groom wears wedding attire. From the perspective of ‘urf, this tradition is categorized as ‘urf al-‘amalī and ‘urf al-khāṣ. However, it may become ‘urf fāsid when it contains superstition, mystical claims, or elements contrary to sharia. The study concludes that Ba Iyeh reflects the dynamic interaction between Minangkabau customary practice and Islamic legal norms. These findings contribute to the study of Islamic customary law and provide practical implications for customary and religious leaders to reconstruct the tradition by preserving its cultural values while eliminating elements that conflict with Islamic teachings.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Afdhalia, A. N., & Fathurohman SW, O. (2025). Thrifting practices as a form of sustainable fashion in Indonesia: A fiqh muamalah analysis. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam, 17(1), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i1.10025
Ahmed, H. (2025). Islamic normative legal theory: Framework and applications. Journal of Law and Religion, 40(1), 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2025.10056
Alhkarni, A., & Yuriska, N. (2024). Minangkabau customary marriage traditions: Integration of custom and Sharia principles in the perspective of Islamic law. USRATY: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 2(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.30983/usraty.v2i2.8834
Asmaniar, A. (2018). Perkawinan Adat Minangkabau. Binamulia Hukum, 7(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v7i2.23
Buana, A. P., & Mamonto, M. A. W. W. (2023). The role of customary law in natural resource management: A comparative study between Indonesia and Australia. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 3(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v3i2.400
Fazli, F. H., & Safi, S. I. S. (2025). Valid custom (‘urf al-sahih): Its legitimacy and implications in Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v2i1.192
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801044
Hariri, A., & Babussalam, B. (2024). Legal pluralism: Concept, theoretical dialectics, and its existence in Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 6(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566
Hassan, S. A., & Batool, M. (2024). Concept of ‘urf (custom) in Islamic law and its application in social affairs: An analytical study. Mohi Ud Din Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(I), 1–30. https://mjis.miu.edu.pk/index.php/mjis/article/view/57
Ismail, M., Faisal, R. A. H., & Zainur, Z. (2025). Marriage and divorce in Islamic law: Sociological implications for modern Muslim societies. Journal of Islamic Law El Madani, 4(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.55438/jile.v4i1.142
Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari’ah law: An introduction. Oneworld Publications.
Khaira, K. A., Wahid, M., Rakhman, M. A., & Maulana, R. Y. (2024). The roles of Ninik Mamak on the victory of Mahyeldi and Audy in the 2020 election in Agam Regency, West Sumatera. JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik), 9(3), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v9i3.53329
Narah, U. (2023). A study on traditional wedding rituals of the Mising tribe: Transition and adaptation in the contemporary era. SAARC Culture Journal, 9, 82–105. https://saarcculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/SAARC-Culture-Journal-Vol-9-2023.pdf
Navis, A. A. (1984). Alam terkembang jadi guru: Adat dan kebudayaan Minangkabau. Grafiti Pers.
Pallathadka, L. K., Pallathadka, H., & Devi, M. S. (2022). A review of marriage rituals in different cultures. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 2(5), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.2.5.24
Pangulu, M. S. D. R., Fikri, H., Syofiani, S., & Isnanda, R. (2022). Marriage system in Minangkabau culture: Temporary Minangkabau people’s perception. Journal of Cultura and Lingua, 3(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.37301/culingua.v3i1.106
Sebastian, A. (2026). Matrilineal practices among Muslims: An ethnographic study of the Minangkabau of West Sumatra. Ethnography, 27(1), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381221147137
Setiawan, I., Muzaffar Wahyu, A., Rahman, A., & Sutrisno, A. (2024). Juridical study of customary law in the Indonesian national legal system. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 2(8), 1824–1831. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v2i8.317
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Alfabeta.
Waheeda, W., Mutakin, A., Isroiliyah, I., Lubis, R., & Saujan, I. (2025). The dynamic interplay: A normative-philosophical study of Islam and local wisdom in Indonesia. ASEAN Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization (AJISC), 2(1), 61–91. https://doi.org/10.62976/ajisc.v2i1.1369




















