Main Article Content


Abstract

The issue of price determination in the gambier commodity trade has received attention in several previous studies; however, studies that specifically examine the compatibility of price-setting mechanisms with Islamic economic principles at the local level remain limited. This study aimed to analyze the price-setting system in gambier buying and selling from the perspective of Islamic economics in Nagari Muaro Paiti, Kapur IX Subdistrict, Lima Puluh Kota Regency. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study design. The research informants consisted of key informants and supporting informants selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation, and were then analyzed using the stages of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that gambier price determination was dominated by middlemen by considering demand, market prices, product quality, and the level of competition, whereas farmers tended to be positioned as price takers. Limited access to information and farmers’ dependence on middlemen caused a consistent price gap between the farm-gate level and the market. These findings contribute to the development of price theory studies in Islamic economics, particularly regarding the principles of justice, transparency, and mutual consent in transactions. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of balancing market power and access to information in creating a fairer gambier trading system. The implications of this study indicate the need to strengthen farmer institutions, improve price transparency, and provide policy support for the plantation sector to strengthen farmers’ bargaining position and open opportunities for further studies on strengthening institution- and technology-based commodity trade.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 9852.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. El-Awny H. (2026)
    Litho-structural mapping using remote sensing, petrographic characterization, and SEM/EDX mineralization analysis: insights from the Arabian-Nubian Shield
    Scientific Reports, 16(1)
  2. González-Serna P. (2026)
    Withdrawal strength of fully threaded structural screws perpendicular to the grain. Experimental analysis on European oak timber elements
    Maderas Ciencia Y Tecnologia, 28
  3. dos Santos Zanotelli S. (2026)
    Construction and validity of an online course for nurses on the analysis and interpretation of prenatal laboratory tests
    Cogitare Enfermagem, 31

Article Details

How to Cite
Arianto, K., & Awaluddin, A. (2026). Analisis Sistem Penetapan Harga dalam Jual Beli Gambir Ditinjau dari Perspektif Ekonomi Islam di Nagari Muaro Paiti Kecamatan Kapur IX Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota. ARZUSIN, 6(3), 2391-2404. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v6i3.9852

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Perkebunan Indonesia 2023.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Chapra, M. U. (2016). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective. Islamic Foundation.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fauzi, A., Rahman, A., & Siregar, H. (2022). Analisis Komoditas Gambir Indonesia dalam Perdagangan Global. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 10(2), 145–156.

Flick, U. (2020). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Mitchell, M. (2017). Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. SAGE Publications.

Haneef, M. A. (2019). Islamic economics: Theory, policy and social justice. Routledge.

Hasan, Z. (2020). Islamic finance and economics: An introduction. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/12294

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hidayat, T., Karim, A., & Yusuf, M. (2021). Asimetri Informasi dalam Perdagangan Komoditas Pertanian. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 19(2), 120–132.

Islahi, A. A. (2018). Economic thought of Ibn Taymiyyah. Islamic Research and Training Institute.

Karim, A. A. (2020). Ekonomi Mikro Islam (5th ed.). RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. (2021). Statistik Perkebunan Unggulan Nasional.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Lubis, R., & Nasution, M. (2020). Transparansi Harga dalam Perdagangan Komoditas Pertanian. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian, 8(1), 55–66.

Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of economics (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Maxwell, J. A. (2019). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Neuman, W. L. (2020). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (8th ed.). Pearson.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pratama, R., Sari, D., & Putra, A. (2022). Ketimpangan Informasi Harga dan Kesejahteraan Petani. Jurnal Agribisnis, 14(2), 101–112.

Qardhawi, Y. (2017). Norma dan Etika Ekonomi Islam. Gema Insani.

Rahman, A., Sari, D., & Putra, A. (2020). Struktur Pasar dan Harga Komoditas Pertanian. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian, 12(1), 45–58.

Rahmawati, N., Zainuddin, M., & Hidayat, T. (2023). Variasi Harga Komoditas Pertanian antar Wilayah. Jurnal Ekonomi Regional, 11(1), 77–89.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sari, D., & Putra, A. (2022). Peran Tengkulak dalam Sistem Perdagangan Pertanian. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 15(1), 33–44.

Silverman, D. (2021). Qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yusuf, M., & Karim, A. (2019). Ketergantungan Petani terhadap Tengkulak. Jurnal Ekonomi Desa, 7(2), 89–101.

Zainuddin, M. (2022). Analisis Struktur Pasar Komoditas Lokal. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 20(1), 65–78.