Analisis Penyimpangan Pembiayaan BPRS dan Implikasinya terhadap Kesejahteraan Pelaku UMKM (Studi Kasus Bank Perekonomian Rakyat Syariah Haji Miskin Pandai Sikek) Analysis of Deviations in BPRS Financing and Their Implications for the Welfare of UMKM Actors (A Case Study at Bank Perekonomian Rakyat Syariah Haji Miskin Pandai Sikek)

Main Article Content

Rani Junia Salputri
Septria Susanti

Abstract

The misuse of financing funds by MSME actors has become a focus in various previous studies; however, research that specifically discusses its implications for the welfare of business actors remains limited. This study aims to analyze the forms of misuse of financing funds, their causal factors, and their implications for the welfare of MSME actors at BPRS Haji Miskin Pandai Sikek. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. The research informants consisted of BPRS management and MSME actors selected through the purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation and were then analyzed using thematic analysis through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the misuse of financing funds predominantly takes the form of using funds for nonproductive needs, lack of openness regarding business information, and noncompliance with financing contracts. These deviations have an impact on low business growth, income stagnation, the absence of asset growth, and increased risk of default. These findings contribute to the development of agency theory and broaden understanding of customer behavior in Islamic financing. The conclusion of the study emphasizes that supervision, financial literacy, and compliance with contracts are important factors in ensuring the effective use of financing funds. The practical implication is that Islamic financial institutions need to improve their monitoring systems and business assistance so that financing can contribute more optimally to the welfare of MSME actors.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Sree S. (2027)
    Innovations in electrospinning techniques for nanomaterial synthesis and their applications in the field of active food packaging
    Journal of Future Foods, 7(1), 50-64
  2. Chaudhury N. (2027)
    A systematic review on the role of ceramic membranes for quality enhancement in food industries
    Journal of Food Engineering, 420
  3. Shayesteh A.A. (2027)
    Potential of pulsed electric field for liquid foods: Strategies for optimization and quality enhancement
    Journal of Food Engineering, 420

Article Details

How to Cite
Salputri, R. J., & Susanti, S. (2026). Analisis Penyimpangan Pembiayaan BPRS dan Implikasinya terhadap Kesejahteraan Pelaku UMKM (Studi Kasus Bank Perekonomian Rakyat Syariah Haji Miskin Pandai Sikek). ARZUSIN, 6(3), 2162-2176. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v6i3.9780

References

Abdullah, M., & Junus, M. (2023). Financial literacy in Islamic microfinance: Evidence from MSMEs. Journal of Islamic Economics, 15(2), 120–135.

Angrosino, M. (2016). Naturalistic Observation. Routledge.

Aziz, A. (2025). Islamic business ethics and financial compliance in modern banking. Journal of Islamic Business Studies, 8(1), 45–60.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dhika, R. (2024). Ethical challenges in Islamic finance institutions. International Journal of Islamic Finance, 12(1), 33–48.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fakultas Agama Islam. (2021). Pembiayaan Bermasalah pada UMKM dalam Perspektif Syariah.

Flick, U. (2018). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Mitchell, M. (2020). Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506374680

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1037/10628-000

Jannah, R. (2023). Islamic banking performance in Indonesia: A financing perspective. Journal of Sharia Economics, 11(2), 89–102.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Laksmi, N. P., & Arjawa, I. K. (2023). Risk factors in Islamic financing among MSMEs. Journal of Islamic Finance Studies, 9(2), 78–91.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). The Constructivist Credo. Routledge.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhamad. (2005). Manajemen Pembiayaan Bank Syariah. UPP AMP YKPN.

Nasution, M. I., et al. (2023). Financing deviation in Islamic banking sector. Journal of Islamic Finance Research, 7(1), 22–36.

Pasaribu, H., & Indra, M. (2024). Role of Islamic rural banks in MSME development. Journal of Economic Development, 18(1), 55–70.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pratama, A., et al. (2022). The impact of Islamic financing on MSME welfare. Journal of Islamic Economics, 14(2), 101–115.

Prima, D. (2024). Factors influencing non-performing financing in Islamic banks. Journal of Banking Studies, 10(1), 44–58.

Purwaningsih, E. (2024). Financial literacy and MSME performance. Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 66–80.

Rahardjo, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif untuk Ilmu Sosial.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. Guilford Press.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.