Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Layer duck farming businesses have received attention in several studies, but research that specifically discusses financial feasibility analysis integrated with the perspective of Islamic Economics remains limited. This study aims to analyze the financial feasibility of the Wijaya Farm layer duck business and to evaluate its conformity with the principles of Islamic Economics. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving the business owner and workers selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation, and were then analyzed using thematic analysis as well as financial feasibility calculations covering cash flow, payback period, average rate of return, net present value, profitability index, and break-even point. The results showed that the Wijaya Farm layer duck business was financially feasible, with a positive net cash flow of Rp1,240,858,000, a payback period of 4 years and 6 months, an average rate of return of Rp108,023,830, a net present value of Rp464,402,770, a profitability index of 16.48 times, and a break-even point that could be achieved and tended to decline from year to year. In addition, this business was also in accordance with the principles of Islamic Economics because it used personal capital without interest-based loans, thereby avoiding elements of riba, gharar, and maysir, and producing halal products. These findings contribute to the development of studies on investment feasibility and Islamic Economics and broaden understanding of livestock businesses based on sharia values. The conclusion of this study affirms the importance of financial feasibility analysis and sharia compliance in the development of livestock businesses, while also implying the need for more structured financial management for business actors.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 9663.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Silva A. (2026)
    Improving rotor-casing rubbing detection performance with time-frequency domain-based accelerometer signal processing methodologies
    Results in Engineering, 32
  2. Alemán Madrigal L.E. (2026)
    Delivery Platforms and the Work Test: an Analysis from the Perspective of Nicaraguan Labor Law
    Revista Latinoamericana De Derecho Social, 22(43)
  3. Türkoğlu B. (2026)
    Governing through Repression: The Spatial Logics of State Power in Turkey (1923–2019)
    International Political Sociology, 20(4)

Article Details

How to Cite
Zilka, T. L., & Hidayat, F. (2026). Analisis Kelayakan Finansial Usaha Ternak Itik Petelur Wijaya Farm di Nagari Jawi-Jawi Kecamatan Gunung Talang Kabupaten Solok Berdasarkan Perspektif Islam. ARZUSIN, 6(2), 1623-1636. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v6i2.9663

References

Angrosino, M. V. (2016). Naturalistic observation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315423616

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sumatera Barat. (2024). Statistik Peternakan Sumatera Barat 2024.

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2020). Financial management: Theory & practice (16th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Chapra, M. U. (2016). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective. Kube Publishing Ltd.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dusuki, A. W. (Ed.). (2012). Islamic financial system: Principles & operations. International Shari’ah Research Academy for Islamic Finance (ISRA).

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Kusumaningtyas, E., et al. (2012). Produksi dan Kualitas Telur Itik di Indonesia. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia, 14(2), 123–130.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Mutia, R., et al. (2023). Analisis Biaya Pakan terhadap Usaha Ternak Itik Petelur. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 11(2), 145–156.

Ningtyas, R., et al. (2023). Teori Produksi Jangka Pendek dalam Agribisnis. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian, 5(1), 55–67.

Nugraha, A., et al. (2023). Analisis Kelayakan Investasi Usaha Agribisnis. Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis, 10(1), 33–45.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Pramuditu, A., & Putra, R. (2025). Integrasi Ekonomi Islam dalam Analisis Investasi. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 9(1), 1–15.

Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., Jaffe, J., & Jordan, B. D. (2019). Corporate finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Rukmana, R., & Wibowo, Y. (2014). Budidaya itik petelur. Kanisius.

Sari, D., et al. (2017). Analisis Usaha Ternak Itik Petelur di Indonesia. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara, 3(2), 89–98.

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.

Savira, R., & Putri, D. (2022). Evaluasi Kelayakan Finansial Usaha Mikro. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 8(1), 22–34.

Sitinjak, H., et al. (2024). Efisiensi Faktor Produksi dalam Agribisnis Modern. Jurnal Agribisnis Terapan, 6(1), 10–21.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.