Analisis Pengelolaan Berbasis Manajemen Risiko pada Usaha Bibit Ikan Nila di Nagari Paninjauan Kabupaten Agam (Studi Kasus: Usaha Ikan Nila Pak Danil Paninjauan) Analysis of Risk Management-Based Management in the Tilapia Seed Business in Nagari Paninjauan, Agam Regency (Case Study: Mr. Danil Paninjauan's Tilapia Business)

Main Article Content

Nurul Wafiq Azizah
Andis Febrian

Abstract

Although the management of aquaculture businesses, particularly tilapia fingerling businesses, has received attention in a number of studies, studies that specifically discuss risk management-based management in micro-scale businesses at the local level remain limited. This study aims to analyze risk management-based management and the impact of the risks faced in a tilapia fingerling business in Nagari Paninjauan. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving three participants consisting of the business owner and two employees selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation, and were then analyzed using interactive qualitative analysis techniques through the stages of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that risk management had been carried out through the stages of risk identification, analysis, evaluation, and management, although it had not yet been implemented systematically and in a structured manner. The main risks faced included weather changes, water quality, pest and disease attacks, and market price instability, which had an impact on declining production, financial losses, and business sustainability. These findings contribute to the development of the concept of risk management in the context of micro-scale aquaculture businesses while broadening understanding of experience-based risk management practices in the field. This study concludes that strengthening risk management is an important aspect of maintaining business sustainability, so business actors and the government need to improve risk management capacity through a more systematic approach. The implications of this study include theoretical and practical contributions, while also opening opportunities for further research related to the integration of technology in risk management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. V M.A. (2027)
    EVALUATION OF ECOFRIENDLY INSECTICIDES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF RICE CASEWORM PARAPOYNX STAGNALIS (ZELLER)
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1), 117-121
  2. Bhagawati S. (2027)
    NOVEL INSECTICIDES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LIVE WOOD EATING TERMITES IN TEA PLANTATIONS OF ASSAM
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1), 178-182
  3. Sepe M. (2027)
    INTEGRATION OF REFUGIA PLANTS AND BEAUVERIA BASSIANA FOR SUSTAINABLE PEST MANAGEMENT IN MAIZE CULTIVATION ON WETLANDS
    Indian Journal of Entomology, 89(1), 82-87

Article Details

How to Cite
Azizah, N. W., & Febrian, A. (2026). Analisis Pengelolaan Berbasis Manajemen Risiko pada Usaha Bibit Ikan Nila di Nagari Paninjauan Kabupaten Agam (Studi Kasus: Usaha Ikan Nila Pak Danil Paninjauan). ARZUSIN, 6(2), 1472-1485. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v6i2.9539

References

Ahmed, N., & Diana, J. S. (2015). Coastal to inland: Expansion of prawn farming for adaptation to climate change in Bangladesh. Aquaculture Reports, 2, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2015.08.001

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Febrianti, D., & Fahri, M. (2023). Analisis Risiko Produksi pada Usaha Budidaya Ikan Nila. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 11(1), 23–35.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2022). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022: Towards blue transformation. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461en

Fusch, P. I., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.5590/JOSC.2018.10.1.02

Hanafi, M. M. (2014). Manajemen Risiko (3rd ed.). UPP STIM YKPN.

Idroes, F. N. (2008). Manajemen Risiko Perbankan: Pemahaman Pendekatan 3 Pilar Kesepakatan Basel II. Rajawali Pers.

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Kurniawati, D., Rahman, A., & Sari, M. (2021). Analisis Risiko Usaha Perikanan Skala Kecil. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan, 16(2), 101–115.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (38th ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Rolianah, R., & Albar, M. (2019). Manajemen Risiko dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 4(2), 87–98.

Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Terry, G. R. (2008). Principles of management. Richard D. Irwin.

Ulandari, S., & Febrian, A. (2025). Analisis Pengelolaan Resiko Travel Ibadah Umrah dalam Meningkatkan Kepuasan Jamaah (Studi Kasus PT. Suttra Tour Hidayah). Jurnal Inovasi Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 6(4), 157.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zulfikri, M., & Wijayanto, D. (2021). Peran Sektor Perikanan dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 19(2), 115–130.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.