Dampak Dinamika Persaingan Harga Beli Sayur oleh Toke pada Kesejahteraan Petani di Pasar Koto Baru, Kec. X Koto, Kab. Tanah Datar Impact of the Dynamics of Vegetable Purchase Price Competition by Toke on Farmers' Welfare in Koto Baru Market, X Koto District, Tanah Datar Regency
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1387-1402
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/arzusin.v6i2.9529
Viewed: 79 times
Downloaded: 52 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Nurfalah Nurfalah1*, Iiz Izmuddin2
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the dynamics of price competition in the marketing of agricultural products have received attention in a number of studies, studies that specifically discuss the mechanism of competition in vegetable purchase prices by toke and its impact on farmers’ welfare in traditional markets remain limited. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of competition in vegetable purchase prices by toke and its impact on farmers’ welfare in Pasar Koto Baru, X Koto Subdistrict, Tanah Datar Regency. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving participants consisting of farmers, toke, and representatives of the nagari government selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation, and were then analyzed using the stages of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that the determination of vegetable purchase prices had no official standard and was entirely determined by toke based on supply conditions and product quality. Competition among toke took place in a limited manner through verbal agreements, so prices tended to be uniform, whereas farmers were in the position of price takers with limited access to information and distribution. These conditions had an impact on income instability, imbalance in social relations, and psychological pressure on farmers. These findings contribute to the development of imperfect market theory while broadening understanding of traditional market dynamics from economic and social perspectives. This study concludes that price transparency and the strengthening of farmers’ bargaining positions are important aspects in improving farmers’ welfare. Therefore, the government and stakeholders need to expand access to information and improve the distribution system. The implications of this study include theoretical and practical contributions, while also opening opportunities for further research related to strengthening farmers’ institutions.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Anindita, R., & Baladina, N. (2017). Pemasaran produk pertanian. Andi Offset.
Angrosino, M. (2016). Naturalistic observation. Routledge.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik Indonesia 2023. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2023/02/28/18018f9896f09f03580a614b/statistik-indonesia-2023.html
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Chapra, M. U. (2016). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective. Kube Publishing.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
FAO. (2021). The state of food and agriculture 2021. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/7e6336f8-d90d-4936-805b-f612a218f0c8/content
Guraida, & Izmuddin. (2023). Strategi bertahan usaha mikro kuliner pada era pandemic (Covid19) ditinjau dari sudut pandang ekonomi syariah. Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 6(3), 1099–1112. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v6i3.3585
Haneef, M. A. (2018). Islamic economics: Theory and practice. Pearson.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kementerian Pertanian. (2023). Laporan kinerja Kementerian Pertanian Tahun 2022. https://ppid.pertanian.go.id/doc/1/Laporan%20Kinerja%20Kementan%202022.pdf
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2018). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mankiw, N. G. (2022). Principles of economics (9th ed.). Cengage.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.
Neuman, W. L. (2020). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (8th ed.). Pearson.
Nicholson, W., & Snyder, C. (2017). Microeconomic theory: Basic principles and extensions (12th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Prayoga, F., & Febrian, A. (2024). Pengaruh promosi dan strategi penjualan terhadap perkembangan usaha pakaian Toko Jaya Makmur Pasar Aur Kota Bukittinggi menurut perspektif bisnis syariah. Krigan: Journal of Management and Sharia Business, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30983/krigan.v2i1.8205
Rahman, A., et al. (2020). Peran tengkulak dalam distribusi hasil pertanian. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 8(2), 123–135.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sari, D., & Putra, R. (2019). Analisis fluktuasi harga komoditas pertanian. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian, 7(1), 45–58.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suryana, A. (2020). Sistem distribusi pertanian di Indonesia. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, 38(1), 1–15.
Susilowati, S. H. (2019). Struktur pasar pertanian di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 37(2), 89–102.
Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. W. W. Norton & Company.
Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach (9th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Wahyuni, S., et al. (2021). Fluktuasi harga hortikultura. Jurnal Hortikultura Indonesia, 12(2), 101–112.
World Bank. (2020). Agriculture and food global practice report.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.