Analisis Semiotika dalam Tradisi Mangalap Tondi di Kecamatan Batang Toru Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan Semiotic Analysis in the Mangalap Tondi Tradition in Batang Toru District, South Tapanuli Regency

Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Although the mangalap tondi tradition as part of cultural communication has received attention in a number of studies, studies that specifically examine the symbolic meaning of this tradition through Roland Barthes’s semiotic approach remain limited. This study aims to explore and analyze the symbolic meaning in the mangalap tondi tradition among the Batak Angkola community in Batang Toru Subdistrict, South Tapanuli Regency. This study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive design, involving informants selected purposively. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, and then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman data analysis technique, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that the symbolic meaning in the mangalap tondi tradition is divided into three main categories, namely object symbols, speech symbols, and action symbols. These three categories contain denotative, connotative, and mythological meanings that represent the community’s belief system regarding the existence of tondi. These findings contribute to the development of semiotic theory in the context of cultural communication while also broadening understanding of the local cultural practices of the Batak Angkola community. This study concludes that symbolic meaning plays an important role in maintaining the sustainability of cultural traditions and underscores the need for efforts to preserve cultural values through deeper understanding. The implications of this study include theoretical contributions to cultural communication studies and practical contributions to local cultural preservation, as well as opening space for further research on the dynamics of changes in cultural meaning in the modern era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Ricaldi Echevarria M.L. (2026)
    Educational inequalities in academic performance in secondary education in Peru: a multilevel analysis
    Praxis Educativa, 21
  2. Couto M. (2026)
    Exploiting topic analysis models to explore psychological dimensions in social media data
    Scientific Reports, 16(1)
  3. Chen W. (2026)
    Comment on “Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A propensity score-matched analysis”
    Medicina Clinica, 166(10)

Article Details

How to Cite
Sumayya, S., & Harahap, A. (2026). Analisis Semiotika dalam Tradisi Mangalap Tondi di Kecamatan Batang Toru Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan. ARZUSIN, 6(2), 1240-1253. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v6i2.9499

References

Agustinoya, M. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Ilmu Sosial. Deepublish.

Anggito, A., & Setiawan, J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. CV Jejak.

Astuti, D., & Buldani, K. (2016). Komunikasi dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya. Jurnal Komunikasi, 8(2), 120–130.

Betaubun, M. (2023). Komunikasi Budaya dalam Masyarakat Lokal Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(1), 45–56.

Blareq, R., & Purba, J. (2024). Tradisi dan Nilai Filosofis dalam Budaya Batak. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 45(1), 77–90.

Borong, R. (2024). Analisis Semiotika dalam Komunikasi Budaya. Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 12(1), 33–48.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

El Mala, M. (2023). Analisis Semiotika dalam Tradisi Kai’an. Jurnal Budaya dan Tradisi, 9(2), 101–115.

Emzir. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data. Rajawali Pers.

Hartono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Zanafa Publishing.

Jazeri, M. (2020). Semiotika Roland Barthes dalam Kajian Budaya. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 18(2), 89–102.

Pakpahan, H., & Sinulingga, E. (2023). Analisis Semiotika dalam Komunikasi Budaya. Jurnal Komunikasi Nusantara, 11(1), 55–70.

Rahmawati, R. (2022). Simbolisasi Budaya dalam Tradisi Ammaca Patingalla’. Jurnal Antropologi Sosial, 14(2), 122–135.

Raihan, M., et al. (2023). Modernisasi dan Perubahan Budaya Lokal. Jurnal Sosiologi Indonesia, 29(1), 67–80.

Siregar, D. (2025). Perspektif Teologis dalam Tradisi Mangalap Tondi. Jurnal Studi Agama, 17(1), 50–65.

Sobur, A. (2015). Analisis Teks Media: Suatu Pengantar untuk Analisis Wacana, Analisis Semiotik, dan Analisis Framing. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sulianta, F. (2024). Dinamika Budaya dalam Era Digital. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 20(1), 88–100.

Suryawan, I. (2023). Semiotika dan Interpretasi Budaya. Jurnal Kajian Semiotika, 10(2), 44–59.

Trisna, A., et al. (2024). Komunikasi Budaya dalam Masyarakat Modern. Jurnal Komunikasi Global, 6(1), 23–37.

Yusuf, A. M. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Kencana.


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.