Brand Activism pada Pasar Konsumen dan Dampaknya terhadap Purchase Intention: Peran Brand Trust sebagai Mediating Mechanism Brand Activism in Consumer Markets and Its Impact on Purchase Intention: The Role of Brand Trust as a Mediating Mechanism
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although brand activism has attracted growing attention in the marketing literature, studies that specifically examine the psychological mechanisms through which brand activism influences purchase intention in emerging markets remain limited. This study aimed to analyze the effect of brand activism on purchase intention with brand trust as a mediating variable in the context of the Indonesian consumer market. A quantitative approach with a cross-sectional survey design was employed, involving 385 millennial and Generation Z respondents in Indonesia selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with AMOS 24.0. The results show that brand activism has a significant positive effect on purchase intention (β = 0.412, p < 0.001) and brand trust (β = 0.536, p < 0.001). Brand trust also significantly affects purchase intention (β = 0.539, p < 0.001) and partially mediates the relationship between brand activism and purchase intention (indirect effect = 0.289, p < 0.001), with a total effect of 0.701. These findings contribute to the development of consumer–brand relationship theory by identifying trust as a critical mediating mechanism and by extending understanding of the effectiveness of brand activism in emerging markets with distinctive socio-cultural characteristics. The study concludes that authentic and consistent brand activism is crucial for building consumer trust and encouraging purchase intention, and recommends that brand managers design activism strategies that prioritize authenticity, long-term commitment, and tangible social impact. The implications of this research include a theoretical contribution to the literature on conscious consumerism and practical implications for companies targeting consumers who are concerned with social issues, while also opening opportunities for further research on the differential effects of various types of activism and cultural boundary conditions.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. (2008). Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1
Bertrand, O., & Betschinger, M.-A. (2022). Export barriers for SMEs in emerging countries: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Research, 149, 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.045
Brock, M., Doremus, J., & Li, L. (2021). Birds of a feather lockdown together: Mutual bird-human benefits during a global pandemic. Ecological Economics, 189, 107174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107174
Burton, N., Vu, M. C., & Discua Cruz, A. (2022). Our social legacy will go on: Understanding outcomes of family SME succession through engaged Buddhism. Journal of Business Research, 143, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.034
Fianto, A. Y. A., Widyantara, H., & Baskara, D. B. (2022). Analisis Mediasi Brand Awareness dan Brand Trust dalam Hubungan Emotional Marketing dengan Purchase Intention. JMK (Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan), 7(2), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.32503/jmk.v7i2.2348
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Holbrook, B. (2012). The chain and to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. 65(2), 81–93.
Hydock, C. (n.d.). Electronic copy available at SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4101395 [Broken link]
Hydock, C., Paharia, N., & Blair, S. (2021). Should your brand pick a side? How market share determines the impact of divisive corporate political stances. NIM Marketing Intelligence Review, 13(2), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.2478/nimmir-2021-0013
Moorman, C. (2020). Commentary: Brand activism in a political world. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620945260
Netemeyer, R., & Van Ryn, M. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Prasetyo, A., & Ahmadi, M. A. (2024). Pengaruh Aktivitas Pemasaran Media Sosial terhadap Niat Pembelian: Dengan Peran Mediasi Brand Image dan Brand Trust. 1, 43–55.
Studi, P., Manajemen, M., Studi, P., & Manajemen, M. (2023). Pengaruh Brand Attitude, Brand Affect dan Brand Characteristic terhadap Consumer Brand Axtention Attitude dengan Brand Loyalty sebagai Variabel Intervening Effect of Brand Attitude, Brand Affect and Brand Characteristic on Consumer Brand Axtention Attitude with Brand Loyalty as Intervening Variable. 1–14.
Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., & Kemper, J. A. (2020). Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39(4), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620947359




















