Studi Kasus: Analisis Kesulitan Guru dalam Merancang Modul Ajar Berdasarkan Hasil Visitasi Case Study: Analysis of Teachers’ Difficulties in Designing Teaching Modules Based on Visitation Findings
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
51-64
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/alsys.v6i1.8323
Viewed: 160 times
Downloaded: 116 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Sartika Sartika1*, Haidar Akmal Ghifari2, Neng Wulan Anatasya3
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The implementation of the Kurikulum Merdeka requires teachers to develop flexible, student-centered teaching modules that are aligned with the principles of differentiated instruction and diagnostic assessment. However, in practice, various challenges persist when teachers attempt to design teaching modules in a comprehensive and contextual manner. This study aimed to evaluate the challenges faced by teachers in designing Kurikulum Merdeka teaching modules based on school visit findings. A qualitative approach with a case study design was employed, with the subject being a fifth-grade teacher at a public elementary school in Sumedang Regency selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis of the teaching modules, and review of visit notes, and were analyzed using an interactive analysis model comprising data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that the teacher experienced difficulties in designing comprehensive diagnostic assessments, formulating learning objectives based on the ABCD principle, and implementing varied instructional methods suited to students’ needs. In addition, the teaching modules developed still resembled the Kurikulum 2013 format and had not fully reflected the characteristics of the Kurikulum Merdeka. Factors such as high workload, limited technological facilities, and insufficient time to optimally prepare instructional materials further exacerbated these obstacles. The study concludes that the success of teaching module design depends not only on teachers’ conceptual understanding of the Kurikulum Merdeka, but also on systemic support, resource availability, and ongoing mentoring. The implications highlight that strengthening technical assistance for teachers and institutional support is essential to improving the quality of instructional planning in the implementation of the Kurikulum Merdeka in elementary schools.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Kusuma N.A. (2027)Exploring the acceptance of science teachers toward simulator-based technologyMultidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
-
Song H. (2027)From Exploration to Creation: How Teachers Orchestrate AI-Supported Learning in History ClassroomsLecture Notes in Computer Science, 16583 LNAI, 443-458
-
Jin Q. (2027)Using an MR-Based Teacher Orchestration Tool in AI-Supported K-12 ClassroomsLecture Notes in Computer Science, 16585 LNAI, 327-336
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Alfatu, R., Zain, R., Syaifuddin, M., Asih, R. A., & Malang, U. M. (2025). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka: Studi Kasus di Sekolah Dasar Batu. Jurnal Kajian Riset Multisiplin, 9(7), 27–35.
Amalia, K., Rasyad, I., Gunawan, A., & Surabaya, U. N. (2023). Differentiated learning as learning innovation. Journal of Education and Teaching Learning (JETL), 5(2), 185–193.
Amelia, E., Adella, K., Giwangsa, S. F., Indonesia, U. P., & Korespondensi, E. (2023). Analisis Kesulitan Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Menyusun Modul Ajar Kurikulum Merdeka. Basica: Journal of Primary Education, 3(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.37680/basica.v3i2.4597
Arjuni, M., & Aristiati, F. (2024). Kendala-Kendala Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Satuan Pendidikan. IEMJ: Islamic Education Management Journal, 3(1), 1–9.
Farid, M., Putri, M., Rahmah, R., Putra, M. J. A., & Nisa, M. (2025). Peran Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka di SDN 06 Belantik. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keguruan, 3(8), 792–802.
Frisa, E., Anindya, Y., Suneki, S., & Purnamasari, V. (2019). Analisis Gerakan Literasi Sekolah pada Pembelajaran Tematik. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i2.18053
Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., Ting, H., & Cheah, J.-H. (2025). Purposive sampling: A review and guidelines for quantitative research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01
Nasution, I. (2022). Peran Profesional Guru sebagai Pengembang Kurikulum. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 921–934. https://jurnal.staialhidayahbogor.ac.id/index.php/ei/article/view/2166
Nurfajriani, W. V., Wahyu, M., Arivan, I., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Triangulasi Data dalam Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(17), 826–833. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13929272
Pospisilova, D., Elgner, J., Dolezalova, M., Dankova, A., & Pospisil, K. (2025). Determinants of elementary school participation in the traffic education program. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 34, 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101770
Rahma, A. (2018). Implementasi Program Pengurangan Risiko Bencana (PRB) melalui Pendidikan Formal. Varia Pendidikan, 30(1), 1–11.
Saman, A. M., Hasanah, E., Dahlan, A., Info, A., & History, A. (2024). Peran Kepala Sekolah dalam Melaksanankan Supervisi Akademik sebagai Upaya Peningkatkan Kompetensi Guru. JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan), 7(2), 1913–1920. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i2.2512
Sardi, A., Atmowardoyo, H., & Weda, S. (2017). The distinct types of diction used by the EFL teachers in the classroom interaction. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(3), 1061–1066. https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=ART20171558
Tampubolon, R. A. (2025). Gerakan Literasi di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 9(1), 146–151. https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu/article/view/9357
Tang, F., & Zhan, P. (2021). Does diagnostic feedback promote learning? Evidence from a longitudinal cognitive diagnostic assessment. AERA Open, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211060804
Wahidmurni. (2020). Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran: RPP 1 Lembar.
Zulfirman, R. (2022). Implementasi Metode Outdoor Learning dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di MAN 1 Medan. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 3(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.30596/jppp.v3i2.11758