A Critical Analysis Of Karl Raimund Popper's Falsification Theory's Thinking Model Philosophy

Main Article Content

Hilmi Asrori
Usman Usman

Abstract

This article explores the philosophical underpinnings of the falsification theory proposed by Karl Raimund Popper, a key figure in the philosophy of science in the 20th century. Utilizing a library research approach and descriptive analytical methods, the study delves into the core principles and implications of falsification as a model of scientific reasoning. Unlike the verificationist paradigm that seeks to confirm theories through accumulating supportive evidence, Popper’s falsification theory asserts that scientific theories must be testable and open to refutation through empirical observation and experimentation. The article examines how falsification provides a more rigorous framework for distinguishing scientific knowledge from non-scientific claims by promoting continual testing and revision. It further discusses the broader methodological implications of falsification for scientific inquiry, emphasizing its relevance across multiple disciplines. By fostering a mindset of skepticism and critical inquiry, falsification theory challenges researchers to remain open to new evidence and alternative explanations, thereby supporting the evolution of science as a dynamic and self-correcting enterprise. This analysis highlights the enduring importance of Popper’s contribution to research methodology and the development of progressive scientific thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Prahani R.S.B.K. (2027)
    Problem-Based Learning Assisted by Physics Digital Pocket Book: Experimental Study to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Completed with Bibliometric Analysis toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 15-34
  2. Li Y. (2027)
    High entropy (MoW)2(FeCoNi)B2 with outstanding mechanical and tribological properties
    Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 279, 176-187
  3. Sánchez Salazar F. (2027)
    On the Cauchy problem associated with a regularized Benjamin Ono-Zakharov Kuznetsov (rBO-ZK) type equation
    Nonlinear Analysis Real World Applications, 93

Article Details

How to Cite
Asrori, H., & Usman, U. (2025). A Critical Analysis Of Karl Raimund Popper’s Falsification Theory’s Thinking Model Philosophy. ALSYS, 5(3), 743-753. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v5i3.5840

References

Akbar, M. K. (2017). Konsep Ilmu dalam Perspektif al-Ghazali. UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.

Alfirdaus, R., Dinayah, S. Z., Ulhak, R. D., & Winarto, W. (2024). Falsifikasi Popper dan Relevansinya pada Karakteristik Pembelajaran Mahasiswa; Andragogi dan Budaya Akademik. An-Nuha : Jurnal Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Budaya Dan Sosial, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36835/annuha.v11i1.612

Dochmie, M. R. (2018). Keilmiahan Ilmu-ilmu Islam Ditinjau dari Prinsip Falsifikasi Karl Popper. Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains.

Habibah, S. (2019). Paradigma Popperian. Dar El-Ilmi : Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52166/dar%20el-ilmi.v6i2.1726

Hidayat, R. (2024). Harmonisasi Pengetahuan. EL-FIKR: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam, 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/el-fikr.v5i1.21680

Juliardi, B., Pristiyanto, P., Putri, F. R., Pattiasina, P. J., Rismanto, D., Saleh, F., Husnita, L., Shufa, N. K. F., Tobari, T., Rande, S., Panjaitan, M. M. J., & Amane, A. P. O. (2024). Rasionalisme vs Imperisme. CV Gita Lentera.

Kosim, M. (2018). Ilmu Pengetahuan dalam Islam (Perspektif Filosofis-Historis). TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v3i2.232.

Maxwell, N. (2002). Karl Raimund Popper. In British Philosophers. University College London. https://philpapers.org/rec/MAXKRP

Muslih, M. (2021). Filsafat Ilmu. Lesfi.

Muthalib, S. A. (2022). Nalar Agama: Antologi Pemikiran Islam. Unimal Press.

Nugroho, I. (2016). Positivisme Auguste Comte: Analisa Epistemologis dan Nilai Etisnya terhadap Sains. Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam, 11(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31603/cakrawala.v11i2.192

Nur, M. (2012). Revivalisasi Epistemologi Falsifikasi. In Right, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/inright.v2i1.1230

Purwosasaputro, S. (2023). Falsifikasi Sebagai Dasar Epistemologi Karl Raymund Popper dalam Melihat Problem Ilmu Pengetahuan. CIVIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 12(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26877/civis.v12i2.16406

Razaq, A. R., & Umiarso. (2019). Islamic Education Construction from the Perspective of Falsification of Karl R. Popper. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v5i2.5846

Redhani, M. E. (2024). Science and Prophetic Law: Karl Popper’s Falsification Principle and Three Worlds of Science. Prophetic Law Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol6.iss1.art5

Riski, M. A. (2021). Falsifikasi Karl R. Popper dan Urgensinya dala Dunia Akademik. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i3.36536

Ronda, A. M. (2018). Tafsir Kontemporer Ilmu Komunikasi: Tinjauan Teoretis, Epistemologi, Aksiologi. Indigo Media.

Rukin. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.

Saepullah, A. (2020). Epistemologi Falsifikasionisme Karl R. Popper: Relevansinya bagi Teologi dan Pemikiran Keislaman. Journal of Islamic Civilization (JIC), 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33086/jic.v2i2.1737

Sarah, M., & Adib, M. A. (2023). Metodologi Falsifikasi Karl R. Popper dan Implementasinya dalam Membangun Pemahaman Inklusif. At-Tarbawi Al-Haditsah, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/tarbawi.v8i1.13473

Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Setyo Wibowo, A. (2022). Falsifikasi Menurut Karl Raimund Popper. KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia).

Susanto, A. (2019). Filsafat Ilmu: Suatu Kajian dalam Dimensi Ontologis, Epistemologis, dan Aksiologis. Bumi Aksara.

Ulum, B. (2020). Inklusifitas Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam terhadap Persfektif Karl R. Popper. At-Tajdid: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam, 4(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/att.v4i01.1225

Yuwono, A. A. Y. A. (2024). The Epistemology of Falsification: The Implications of Karl Raimund Popper's Thought For Islamic Scientific Studies. Urnal Ilmiah Spiritualis: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Tasawuf, 10(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53429/spiritualis.v10i2.1017


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.