A Critical Analysis Of Karl Raimund Popper's Falsification Theory's Thinking Model Philosophy
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores the philosophical underpinnings of the falsification theory proposed by Karl Raimund Popper, a key figure in the philosophy of science in the 20th century. Utilizing a library research approach and descriptive analytical methods, the study delves into the core principles and implications of falsification as a model of scientific reasoning. Unlike the verificationist paradigm that seeks to confirm theories through accumulating supportive evidence, Popper’s falsification theory asserts that scientific theories must be testable and open to refutation through empirical observation and experimentation. The article examines how falsification provides a more rigorous framework for distinguishing scientific knowledge from non-scientific claims by promoting continual testing and revision. It further discusses the broader methodological implications of falsification for scientific inquiry, emphasizing its relevance across multiple disciplines. By fostering a mindset of skepticism and critical inquiry, falsification theory challenges researchers to remain open to new evidence and alternative explanations, thereby supporting the evolution of science as a dynamic and self-correcting enterprise. This analysis highlights the enduring importance of Popper’s contribution to research methodology and the development of progressive scientific thought.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Akbar, M. K. (2017). Konsep Ilmu dalam Perspektif al-Ghazali. UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.
Alfirdaus, R., Dinayah, S. Z., Ulhak, R. D., & Winarto, W. (2024). Falsifikasi Popper dan Relevansinya pada Karakteristik Pembelajaran Mahasiswa; Andragogi dan Budaya Akademik. An-Nuha : Jurnal Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Budaya Dan Sosial, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36835/annuha.v11i1.612
Dochmie, M. R. (2018). Keilmiahan Ilmu-ilmu Islam Ditinjau dari Prinsip Falsifikasi Karl Popper. Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains.
Habibah, S. (2019). Paradigma Popperian. Dar El-Ilmi : Jurnal Studi Keagamaan, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52166/dar%20el-ilmi.v6i2.1726
Hidayat, R. (2024). Harmonisasi Pengetahuan. EL-FIKR: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam, 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/el-fikr.v5i1.21680
Juliardi, B., Pristiyanto, P., Putri, F. R., Pattiasina, P. J., Rismanto, D., Saleh, F., Husnita, L., Shufa, N. K. F., Tobari, T., Rande, S., Panjaitan, M. M. J., & Amane, A. P. O. (2024). Rasionalisme vs Imperisme. CV Gita Lentera.
Kosim, M. (2018). Ilmu Pengetahuan dalam Islam (Perspektif Filosofis-Historis). TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v3i2.232.
Maxwell, N. (2002). Karl Raimund Popper. In British Philosophers. University College London. https://philpapers.org/rec/MAXKRP
Muslih, M. (2021). Filsafat Ilmu. Lesfi.
Muthalib, S. A. (2022). Nalar Agama: Antologi Pemikiran Islam. Unimal Press.
Nugroho, I. (2016). Positivisme Auguste Comte: Analisa Epistemologis dan Nilai Etisnya terhadap Sains. Cakrawala: Jurnal Studi Islam, 11(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31603/cakrawala.v11i2.192
Nur, M. (2012). Revivalisasi Epistemologi Falsifikasi. In Right, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/inright.v2i1.1230
Purwosasaputro, S. (2023). Falsifikasi Sebagai Dasar Epistemologi Karl Raymund Popper dalam Melihat Problem Ilmu Pengetahuan. CIVIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 12(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26877/civis.v12i2.16406
Razaq, A. R., & Umiarso. (2019). Islamic Education Construction from the Perspective of Falsification of Karl R. Popper. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v5i2.5846
Redhani, M. E. (2024). Science and Prophetic Law: Karl Popper’s Falsification Principle and Three Worlds of Science. Prophetic Law Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol6.iss1.art5
Riski, M. A. (2021). Falsifikasi Karl R. Popper dan Urgensinya dala Dunia Akademik. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i3.36536
Ronda, A. M. (2018). Tafsir Kontemporer Ilmu Komunikasi: Tinjauan Teoretis, Epistemologi, Aksiologi. Indigo Media.
Rukin. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yayasan Ahmar Cendekia Indonesia.
Saepullah, A. (2020). Epistemologi Falsifikasionisme Karl R. Popper: Relevansinya bagi Teologi dan Pemikiran Keislaman. Journal of Islamic Civilization (JIC), 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33086/jic.v2i2.1737
Sarah, M., & Adib, M. A. (2023). Metodologi Falsifikasi Karl R. Popper dan Implementasinya dalam Membangun Pemahaman Inklusif. At-Tarbawi Al-Haditsah, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/tarbawi.v8i1.13473
Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Setyo Wibowo, A. (2022). Falsifikasi Menurut Karl Raimund Popper. KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia).
Susanto, A. (2019). Filsafat Ilmu: Suatu Kajian dalam Dimensi Ontologis, Epistemologis, dan Aksiologis. Bumi Aksara.
Ulum, B. (2020). Inklusifitas Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam terhadap Persfektif Karl R. Popper. At-Tajdid: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam, 4(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/att.v4i01.1225
Yuwono, A. A. Y. A. (2024). The Epistemology of Falsification: The Implications of Karl Raimund Popper's Thought For Islamic Scientific Studies. Urnal Ilmiah Spiritualis: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Tasawuf, 10(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53429/spiritualis.v10i2.1017




















