Kualitas Pelayanan Badan Penyelenggaraan Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) Ketenagakerjaan Kota Padang Service Quality of Badan Penyelenggaraan Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) Ketenagakerjaan in Padang City
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
347-375
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/aldyas.v5i1.8968
Viewed: 217 times
Downloaded: 73 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Gustia Sari1*, Sinta Westika Putri2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Public service quality is a crucial aspect in building public trust and satisfaction, including in the administration of employment social security by BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Padang City, which is required to provide high-quality, effective, and responsive services to participants’ needs. This study aimed to analyze the service quality of BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Padang City based on service quality dimensions and to identify the factors that influence this quality. A qualitative approach was employed, with data collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and subsequently analyzed using NVivo 15 software through Hierarchy Chart and Project Map visualizations within a descriptive analytical framework. The findings show that the service quality of BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Padang City has met most of Zeithaml’s service quality principles, covering the dimensions of tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. However, service quality has not yet been fully optimal, as constraints are still encountered in the form of system disruptions, delays in claim processing, document discrepancies, participants’ lack of understanding of regulations, and uneven speed of service and empathetic attitudes among officers. The study also finds that Moenir’s five key factors—awareness, regulations, organization, officers’ abilities and skills, and service facilities—make significant contributions both as supporting and inhibiting elements in service delivery. These findings underscore that BPJS Ketenagakerjaan’s service quality plays an important role in enhancing participants’ satisfaction and perceptions, while also indicating that the assurance and empathy dimensions still require strengthening so that services become more adaptive and better able to meet participants’ expectations.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Agustina, D., Pasciana, R., & Rosdiana, N. (2024). Dimensi Tangible dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Studi pada Instansi Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(1), 55–67.
Ariyanto. (2021). Efektivitas Pelayanan Publik: Analisis Kejelasan Aturan, Kesederhanaan Prosedur, dan Konsistensi SOP. Penerbit Administrasi Publik Indonesia.
Fadli, & Rijal, M. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1).
Harahap, M. N. (2023). Akselerasi Transformasi Digital dalam Pelayanan Publik Guna Peningkatan Tata Kelola Pemerintah. Lembaga Ketahanan Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Hardiyansyah. (2018). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Konsep, Dimensi, Indikator, dan Implementasinya (Edisi Revisi). Gava Media.
Hasna, A. N., & Bachtiar, W. (2026). Strategi Bidang Kepesertaan Korporasi dan Institusi dalam Pengelolaan Hubungan Peserta BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(1), 38–53. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/JMP/article/view/13285
Idrus, M. (2019). Metode Ilmu Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. Alime.
Kapiso, L., & Andriana, R. (2025). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan D’Talaga Restaurant dan Villa’s Kotamobagu. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(2), 6806–6814. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.1747
Kusumawati, H., Monoarfa, T. A., & Adha, M. A. (2025). Analisis Kepuasan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Tegal. Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 10(2), 71–80. https://cibangsa.com/index.php/triwikrama/article/view/4696
Masruroh, N., & Rahmaningtyas, W. (2020). Penggunaan Model Servqual untuk Menyelisik Kualitas Pelayanan. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 9(2), 666–678. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eeaj/article/view/39481
Moenir, H. A. S. (2021). Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia. Bumi Aksara.
Mulyawan, R. (2016). Kualitas Pelayanan: Konsep dan Implementasi. Alfabeta.
Munir, M. M., & Dwiyanto, B. M. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Rantai Pasokan pada Bisnis Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah Bidang Kuliner di Kabupaten Kendal. Jurnal Studi Manajemen Organisasi, 15(1), 44–54. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/smo/article/view/21245
Oktavia, R. (2019). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan dan Kepuasan Nasabah terhadap Loyalitas Nasabah PT. Bank Index Lampung. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 13(1), 35–39. https://jurnalpemasaran.petra.ac.id/index.php/mar/article/download/21589/19618/29055
Pagan, Y. octaviana O. L., Mitan, W., & Rangga, Y. D. P. (2023). Kualitas Pelayanan dalam Peningkatan Kepuasan Pelanggan. Jurnal Mutiara Ilmu Akuntansi, 1(1), 205–223.
Pasolong, H. (2017). Teori Administrasi Publik. Alfabeta.
Rahadi, D. R. (2020). Konsep Penelitian Kualitatif Plus Tutorial NVivo. Filda Fikrindo.
Rizky, A. M., Pratiwi, M. P., Chairunnisa, A., Aiko, I. A., & Ariesmansyah, A. (2025). E-Goverment: Meningkatkan Efisiensi dan Efektivitas Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(1), 2070–2089. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative/article/view/17827
Rosanjaya, L., & Nafi’ah, B. A. (2023). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik pada Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan Tanjung Perak. Publika: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 9(2), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.25299/jiap.2023.13501
Sari, M., & Hidayat, R. (2021). Keramahan Pegawai dan Citra Instansi: Studi Empirik pada Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Publik, 8(2), 150–163.
Septiarani, A. V., Setyanto, N. W., & Efranto, R. Y. (2014). Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Nasabah BPJS Ketenagakerjaan dengan Metode Fuzzy-SERVQUAL dan Indeks PGCV (Studi Kasus pada BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Malang). Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Sistem Industri, 2(4). https://jrmsi.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jrmsi/article/view/133
Siswanto, B. (2021). Pengantar Manajemen. Bumi Aksara.
Subandowo, M. (2022). Teknologi Pendidikan di Era Society 5.0. Jurnal Sagacious, 9(1), 24–35. https://rumahjurnal.net/sagacious/article/view/1139 [Access restricted]
Sudaryono. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiarto, A., & Lestari, D. (2021). Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan pada Instansi Publik: Studi Tentang Fasilitas Fisik, Kebersihan Lingkungan, dan Profesionalisme Petugas. Pustaka Administrasi Publik.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sutopo, A. H. (2021). Penelitian Kualitatif dengan NVivo. Topazart.