Tanggung Jawab Hadanah dalam Kasus Pengabaian Anak: Analisis Komparatif Hukum Islam dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak di Indonesia Hadanah Responsibility in Cases of Child Neglect: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Law and the Child Protection Law in Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Child neglect in the context of post-divorce hadanah remains a serious issue in Indonesia, particularly because of the weak mechanisms for supervising the implementation of custody decisions and the lack of synchronization between sanctions in Islamic law and criminal instruments in positive law. This study aimed to comparatively analyze the concept and parameters of hadanah responsibility in Islamic law and the Child Protection Law, examine the legal implications for hadanah holders who commit neglect, and formulate an ideal harmonization model to strengthen child protection in Indonesia. This study used a normative juridical approach with a library research method through statutory, shari’a, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The data sources consisted of primary legal materials, including the Qur’an, Hadith, fiqh books, and legislation; secondary legal materials, including journals, books, and tafsir; and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that Islamic law and Law No. 35 of 2014 share common ground in the principle of child welfare, but significant gaps remain in post-decision sanction and supervision mechanisms. This study concludes that hadanah neglect needs to be viewed as a legal violation requiring a systemic response, not merely as a moral violation. The formulated harmonization model includes post-litigation monitoring mechanisms, a tiered sanction system, and standards for evaluating the eligibility of hadanah holders that integrate the principles of maqasid al-shari’ah with the principle of the best interest of the child. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of revising the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), strengthening institutional coordination, and developing Islamic family law studies that are more responsive to child protection.
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Nazah F.N. (2025)Gender Justice in Child Custody Disputes: The Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Approach in Contemporary Judicial PracticeMilrev Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1328-1358
-
Kadarisman A. (2025)BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD IN ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW: INTEGRATING MAQĀṢID AL-SHARĪ‘AH AND DOUBLE MOVEMENT THEORY IN ḤAḌĀNAH CASESJurnal Al Dustur, 8(2), 155-174
-
Puspitasari K. (2026)Exploring the Acceptance of Multiple Micronutrient Supplement (MMS) Among Pregnant Women: A Case Study in Kulon Progo District, YogyakartaAmerta Nutrition, 10(1), 96-105
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Andriyani, A., Barkah, Q., & Ifrohati, I. (2025). Pengabaian Nafkah Anak Secara Sengaja oleh Ayah Pasca Perceraian. Journal of Judicial Review, 27(1), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v27i1.10155
Ansar, L., Hasmiyati, H., Zulfadli, Z., & Tarmizi, T. (2025). Harmonisasi Hukum Islam dan Syariat dalam Prinsip Negara Hukum Modern Indonesia. AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan, 7(2), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v7i2.10372
Arifin, K. (2025). Pernikahan Anak dalam Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syari’ah terhadap Ancaman Stunting. Penerbit Adab.
Azizi, A. Q. (2020). Sanksi Pengabaian Hak Alimentasi Anak: Perspektif Fiqh dan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Jurnal Iqtisad: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.31942/iq.v7i1.3455
Az-Zuhaili, W. (n.d.). Fiqih Islam wa adillatuhu.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Jumlah Perceraian Menurut Provinsi dan Faktor Penyebab Perceraian (perkara), 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/3/YVdoU1IwVmlTM2h4YzFoV1psWkViRXhqTlZwRFVUMDkjMw==/jumlah-perceraian-menurut-provinsi-dan-faktor-penyebab-perceraian--perkara---2024.html?year=2024
Fakhria, S. (2022). Penerapan Asas Kepentingan Terbaik Anak: Telaah Ijtihad Hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam Putusan Hak Asuh Anak. JISRAH: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Syariah, 3(3), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.31958/jisrah.v3i3.7227
Fauzan, Ach., & Hamzah, M. (2024). Pendekatan Holistik dalam Hak Asuh Anak Pasca Perceraian: Perspektif Maqāṣid Syarī’ah Al-Tahir Ibnu Asyur. Al-Rasῑkh: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 13(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.38073/rasikh.v13i1.1747
Harly, A., Saputra, K. D., & Maryani. (2024). Problematics of implementation of execution in child custody cases. Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 12(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v12i02.7469
Hendriko, H. (2025). Relevansi Konsep Hadhanah dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer: Kajian Literatur. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa, 3(5), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.61722/jipm.v3i5.1466
Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Penyebarluasan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. (1991).
Kiener, M. (2020). Fictionalising Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Franz Steiner Verlag.
Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2025a). KPAI: Anak Harus Dilindungi dari Perebutan Orang Tua. https://www.kpai.go.id/publikasi/kpai-anak-harus-dilindungi-dari-dampak-perebutan-orangtua
Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia. (2025b). Laporan Tahunan KPAI, Jalan Terjal Perlindungan Anak: Ancaman Serius Generasi Emas. https://www.kpai.go.id/publikasi/laporan-tahunan-kpai-jalan-terjal-perlindungan-anak-ancaman-serius-generasi-emas-indonesia
Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
Muzayanah. (2022). Tanggung Jawab Orang Tua terhadap Anak untuk Memberikan Perlindungan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Media Ganesha FHIS, 3(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.23887/p2mmgfhis.v3i1.1006
Rahma, S. A., Ikhsan, A. P. P., & Yemima, D. (2024). Dampak Pengabaian Orang Tua terhadap Regulasi Emosi Anak. Jurnal Psikologi, 1(4), 18. https://doi.org/10.47134/pjp.v1i4.2649
Rahmawati, S. A. (2026). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Akibat Terjadinya Perceraian: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2476/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Smg [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang]. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/id/eprint/45425
Salimah, S., Suntana, I., & Alamsyah, T. (2026). Pengaturan Peran KPAD dalam Perda Kota Tasikmalaya Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak dalam Menangani Kekerasan Seksual terhadap Anak Perspektif Siyasah Dusturiyah. QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, 4(3), 1612–1622. https://doi.org/10.58738/qanun.v4i3.1311
Sevtin, K. S., & Satiningsih, S. (2023). Dampak Negatif Korban Child Abuse and Neglect (CAN). Character: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 10(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.26740/cjpp.v10i03.54267
Sugiarto, U. S. (2021). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. (1974).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. (2014).
Zulfia, R. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Pasca Perceraian terhadap Kesejahteraan Anak Menurut Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2002 dalam Perspektif Maqasid Syariah [Tesis magister, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/55014






















