Penegakan Hukum Pidana Internasional terhadap Kejahatan Perang dalam Konflik Rusia dan Ukraina Berdasarkan Statuta Roma 1998 Enforcement of International Criminal Law against War Crimes in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict Based on the 1998 Rome Statute
Main Article Content
Abstract
The armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has given rise to various allegations of war crimes that have attracted the attention of the international community, particularly regarding the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement. Although Russia is not a state party to the 1998 Rome Statute, the International Criminal Court (ICC) still has an important role in prosecuting perpetrators of international crimes. This study aims to analyze the application of ICC jurisdiction to alleged war crimes in the Russia–Ukraine conflict even though Russia is not a state party to the Rome Statute, as well as to identify the juridical and political challenges in the enforcement of international criminal law. This study employed a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results show that the ICC still has a basis for jurisdiction through the territorial principle based on Ukraine’s ad hoc declaration pursuant to Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute, as well as through the principle of complementarity, which places the ICC as the last resort when a state is unable or unwilling to enforce the law effectively. However, the implementation of such jurisdiction faces various challenges, including jurisdictional limitations over non-state parties, dependence on international cooperation, issues of immunity of state officials, global political dynamics, evidentiary constraints in situations of armed conflict, as well as the not yet optimal universalization of the Rome Statute. These findings indicate that the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement in the Russia–Ukraine conflict depends not only on the ICC’s normative legitimacy, but also on political support and the commitment of the international community to preventing impunity for war crimes.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Agus, F. (2008). Pengenalan tentang International Criminal Court (ICC) Bagi Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. FRR Law Office.
Anisah, A., Wahdah, A. N., Nirwana, R. P., & Arini, D. R. (2025). Tantangan Implementasi Yurisdiksi ICC dalam Penegakan Hukum atas Kejahatan Genosida di Negara Non-Pihak. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(4), 405–415. https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/2544
Ashri, A. M. (2025). Tantangan Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (ICC) dalam Pengusutan Kejahatan Serius pada Perang Rusia-Ukraina. Jurist-Diction, 8(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v8i1.59088
Banjarani, D. R., Tahar, A. M., & Aini, D. C. (2017). Studi Perbandingan Kelembagaan dan Yurisdiksi International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) dan the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) dengan International Criminal Court (ICC). Cepalo, 1(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v1no1.1754
Bintang, A., Hasyim, S., & Tjolleng, A. (2025). Peran Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (ICC) dalam Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan Perang. Legal Dialogica, 1(1), 1–18. https://jurnal.fh.umi.ac.id/index.php/legal/article/view/1543
Christianti, D. W. (2015). Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court (ICC) terhadap Warga Negara Non-Pihak Statuta Roma dan Dampaknya bagi Indonesia. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 2(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n1.a3
Effendi, T. (2018). Hukum Pidana Internasional. Pustaka Yustisia.
Fadhil, F. (2025). Penerapan Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court di Wilayah Negara Bukan Pihak Statuta Roma [Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta].
Indra, P. A. N. (2016, November 22). Rusia dan Kegagalan Mahkamah Kriminal Internasional. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/rusia-dan-kegagalan-mahkamah-kriminal-internasional-b5t8
International Criminal Court. (2022, March 2). Statement of ICC Prosecutor, Karim A.A. Khan QC, on the situation in Ukraine: Receipt of referrals from 39 states parties and the opening of an investigation. https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-prosecutor-karim-aa-khan-qc-situation-ukraine-receipt-referrals-39-states
International Criminal Court. (n.d.). Situation in Ukraine. https://www.icc-cpi.int/situations/ukraine
Mahadewa, D. G. R., & Dewi, P. E. T. (2025). Tinjauan Yurisdiksi Hukum Internasional terhadap Kejahatan Perang dalam Konflik Rusia-Ukraina: Analisis Peran Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (ICC). Rio Law Jurnal, 6(2), 865–874. https://doi.org/10.36355/rlj.v6i2.1794
Mufty, M., & DM, N. S. M. (2025). Hukum Pidana Internasional. Tahta Media Group.
Nadrati, B. J., Anjani, I. A. D. A., Umam, I., Akbariman, L. N., & Mernissi, Z. (2023). Yurisdiksi ICC terhadap Perintah Penahanan Putin mengenai Kebijakan Politik Rusia ke Ukraina. Iuris Notitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.69916/iuris.v1i1.43
Nugroho, D. S., & Setiyono, J. (2025). International criminal accountability for war crimes in the Ukraine–Russia conflict: A juridical analysis based on the 1998 Rome Statute. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 8(9), 7154–7160. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i9-54
Prasetyo, M. H. (2020). Kejahatan Genosida dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. Gema Keadilan, 7(3), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.9075
Putra, M. M., Junior, R. G., & Ridwan, K. H. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Menindak Kejahatan Perang: Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i1.852
Rashid, F. M. (2020). The hidden discretionary capacity of the ICC prosecutor: Revisiting the analysis of legal and relative gravity. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(6), 773–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1671827
Rusadi, A., Lestarika, D. P., & Sary, W. E. (2025). Pengaruh Kedaulatan Negara dan Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional terhadap Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum atas Kejahatan Internasional. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 1(3), 240–248. https://jurnal.globalscients.com/index.php/jkhpk/article/view/407
Santoso, I. (2017). Hukum Pidana Internasional. Pustaka Reka Cipta.
Stukalo, N., & Lytvyn, M. (2021). Towards sustainable development through higher education quality assurance. Education Sciences, 11(11), 664. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110664
Suyanto, S. H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris Dan Gabungan. Unigres Press.
Syah, N. H., & Saly, J. N. (2023). Standar Ganda Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional dalam Kasus Perang Rusia-Ukraina Setelah Terbitnya Surat Penangkapan Presiden Vladimir Putin sebagai Pelaku Kejahatan Perang. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(2), 1747–1758. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i2.5420
Tim detikcom. (2022, March 4). Kejahatan perang di Ukraina bikin mahkamah internasional turun tangan. detikNews. https://news.detik.com/internasional/d-5967487/kejahatan-perang-di-ukraina-bikin-mahkamah-internasional-turun-tangan
Wulandari, A., Nur, R. A. A. A. R., & Agustiawan, M. N. (2024). Fungsi Hukum Pidana Internasional terhadap Kejahatan Internasional. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.46306/rj.v4i2.174




















