Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

The bankruptcy estate constitutes the entirety of the debtor’s assets that serves as the source for the repayment of debts to creditors. In bankruptcy practice, the integrity of the bankruptcy estate is often threatened by the debtor’s legal acts that transfer assets to third parties before a declaration of bankruptcy is pronounced in order to avoid general attachment by the curator. This problem becomes increasingly complex when the debtor is in the form of a Limited Liability Company, because the directors, as the company’s organ, have authority over asset management and are therefore in a position that allows asset transfers to be carried out through seemingly lawful legal acts. This study aims to analyze the application of the actio pauliana lawsuit as a legal instrument in protecting the bankruptcy estate from the legal acts of directors and its legal consequences. This study is normative legal research employing a normative-applied approach through a judicial case study. Data were obtained through library research and document study in the form of statutory regulations and court decisions, which were analyzed qualitatively. The results show that the actio pauliana lawsuit is an effective legal instrument for protecting the bankruptcy estate from the debtor’s legal acts that are detrimental to creditors. All assets transferred by the directors to PT Sinar Mas with the approval of Bank ICBC were declared to be returned to the bankruptcy estate and must be handed over to the curator for the repayment of creditors’ claims. These findings affirm the importance of actio pauliana as a legal protection mechanism for the bankruptcy estate and reinforce the role of the curator in ensuring the recovery of the debtor’s assets for the benefit of creditors.

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 9415.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Frounfelker R.L. (2026)
    Mental Health Assessments for Resettled Afghan Children and Adolescents
    Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 13(5), 3802-3813
  2. Afsharzada M.S. (2026)
    Brief repetitive thinking questionnaire (RTQ-10): In a sample of Afghan students
    Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy, 36(4)
  3. Saadat S. (2026)
    Validation of the perseverative thinking questionnaire-children (PTQ-C) in a sample of Afghan children and adolescents exposed to trauma
    European Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 10(3)

Article Details

How to Cite
Adiwangsa, B., Murniati, R., & Ramadhan, H. W. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Boedel Pailit dari Perbuatan Hukum Direksi melalui Gugatan Actio Pauliana. AHKAM, 5(2), 895-912. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9415

References

Busroh, F. F., Khairo, F., & Zhafirah, P. D. (2024). The actio pauliana principle in Indonesian business law. Halu Oleo Law Review, 8(1), 1–13. https://holrev.uho.ac.id/index.php/journal/article/view/104

Butarbutar, E. N. (2019). Pembuktian terhadap Perbuatan Debitor yang Merugikan Kreditur dalam Tuntutan Actio Pauliana: Kajian Putusan Nomor 07/Pdt.Sus-Actio Pauliana/2015/PN.Niaga.Mdn. Jurnal Yudisial, 12(2), 215–234. https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/jy/id/article/view/322

Disemadi, H. S., & Gomes, D. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Konkuren dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 123–134. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPP/article/view/31436

Es. Cape, M. L., Sunarmi, & Siregar, M. (2025). Gugatan Actio Pauliana terhadap Pengalihan Utang Komisaris dalam Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 436 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021). Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4), 1–20. https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/1621

Ginting, E. R. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan: Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit (Hukum Kepailitan Buku 3). Sinar Grafika.

Halintari, Y. Y. (2020). Status Harta Bersama yang Didapatkan setelah Putusan Pernyataan Pailit dan Dimasukkan sebagai Boedel Pailit akibat Tindakan Actio Pauliana: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 461 K/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2019. Indonesian Notary, 2(2), 168–189. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol2/iss2/38/

Hindrawan, P., Sunarmi, Ginting, B., & Harianto, D. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Menerapkan Asas Pari Passu Prorata Parte dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(8), 720–732. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jalr/article/view/223

Hutagaol, P., & Habeahan, B. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Kreditur Konkuren dalam Proses Kepailitan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(5), 1370–1377. https://journal.cattleyadf.org/index.php/Judge/article/view/1894

Jono. (2008). Hukum Kepailitan. Sinar Grafika.

Kamilah, A. (2021). Penerapan Prinsip Actio Pauliana dalam Kepailitan dan Perlindungan Hukumnya terhadap Pembeli yang Beritikad Baik. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 7(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v7i2.2116

Mantili, R. (2020). Actio Pauliana Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan bagi Kreditor Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 6(2), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.127

Muhammad, A. (2014). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Murtadho, N. A. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditor Preferen dalam Pemberesan Proses Kepailitan. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 1(4), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.2499

Noble Effendi, K., & Rasji. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Pembatalan Perbuatan Hukum Debitor yang Merugikan Kreditor Melalui Gugatan Actio Pauliana Menurut Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik, 5(2), 1029–1038. https://dinastirev.org/JIHHP/article/view/3265

Panatagama, A. (2020). Actio Pauliana dalam Kepailitan yang Melebihi Jangka Waktu Satu Tahun. Jurist-Diction, 3(4), 1249–1264. https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JD/article/view/20205

Siahaan, G. P., Sunarmi, Ginting, B., & Siregar, M. (2024). Akibat Hukum Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas yang Diakibatkan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang Dilakukan oleh Direksi. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 3(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v3i3.292

Situmorang, D., Iriansyah, & Triana, Y. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Debitur terhadap Perbankan atas Perjanjian Pinjaman Modal Usaha. Seminar Nasional Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Lancang Kuning, 1(1), 278–289. https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/Senaspu/article/view/13001

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2016). Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Prenada Media.

Suryanata, A., & Muryanto, Y. T. (2024). Analisis Actio Pauliana Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum bagi Kreditor Kepailitan: Studi Putusan Nomor 06/Pdt.Sus.Gugatan Lain-Lain AP/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. Nomor 27/Pdt-Sus PKPU/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2), 63–72. https://journal.appihi.or.id/index.php/Aliansi/article/view/59

Widiyaningrum, W., & Erar Joesoef, I. (2024). Application of the principles of actio pauliana bankruptcy and legal protection against buyers in good faith: Case study: Decision Number 17/Pdt.G/2019/PN Idm. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2023.v8.i1.p57-74

Wiguna, I. N., Andaretna, L. M., Budianto, M. C., & Vala, T. A. (2024). Legal protection for third parties in good faith on actio pauliana litigation in bankruptcy proceedings. Yuridika, 39(2), 181–210. https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/56057

Most read articles by the same author(s)