Analisis Yuridis Penentuan Sisa Utang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan (Putusan 78/Pdt.G/2024/PN Tjk jo. 120/PDT/2024/PT TJK) Juridical Analysis of Determining the Remaining Debt in the Execution of Mortgage Rights (Decision No. 78/Pdt.G/2024/PN Tjk jo. 120/PDT/2024/PT TJK)
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
624-637
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i1.9231
Viewed: 141 times
Downloaded: 92 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Bagus Indrawan1*, Depri Liber Sonata2, Dita Febrianto3, Sepriyadi Adhan S4, Selvia Oktaviana5
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the efficiency of credit settlement through the parate execution mechanism of Hak Tanggungan has been widely discussed, studies that specifically examine disparities in judicial decisions arising from the lack of transparency regarding the breakdown of outstanding debt prior to auction remain limited. This study aims to analyze, from a juridical perspective, the judicial reasoning used to determine the remaining debt in the execution of Hak Tanggungan in Decision Number 78/Pdt.G/2024/PN Tjk jo. Number 120/PDT/2024/PT TJK. The research adopts a normative juridical approach with a statute and case approach design, using primary and secondary legal materials selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through library research and document study, then analyzed qualitatively-normatively using deductive reasoning. The findings show that, formally, the High Court progressively annulled the District Court’s inadmissible (N.O) decision in order to separate the unlawful act (Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, PMH) dispute from the legal regime governing auction buyer protection. However, substantively, the appellate judges became trapped in procedural formalism by validating the auction solely on the basis of evidence of the dispatch of a demand letter, without scrutinizing the absence of a detailed breakdown of the debtor’s remaining debt. These results contribute to the development of substantive justice theory by clarifying the limits of a creditor’s objective good faith and affirming that transparency regarding the details of outstanding debt is an indispensable precondition for the validity of security enforcement. The study concludes that clearer jurisprudential guidelines from the Supreme Court are needed to standardize judicial assessment of Hak Tanggungan execution and recommends strengthening transparency and prudential principles in banking practice. The implications include theoretical contributions to the literature on security law and banking prudence, practical implications for the judiciary, and opportunities for further empirical research on the sociological impact of unilateral execution.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Luo L. (2026)The long-term mortality burden of childhood traumatic fractures: a mediation analysis of osteoarthritis and psychosocial pathways in older European adultsArchives of Public Health, 84(1)
-
Silva A. (2026)Improving rotor-casing rubbing detection performance with time-frequency domain-based accelerometer signal processing methodologiesResults in Engineering, 32
-
Alemán Madrigal L.E. (2026)Delivery Platforms and the Work Test: an Analysis from the Perspective of Nicaraguan Labor LawRevista Latinoamericana De Derecho Social, 22(43)
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Adiyanta, F. C. S. (2019). Hukum dan Studi Penelitian Empiris: Penggunaan Metode Survey sebagai Instrumen Penelitian Hukum Empiris. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(4), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.697-709
Ariadi Subagyono, B. S., & Anand, G. (2018). The problematics of execution law against non-executable judgments and comparisons with Malaysian law. Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah, 9(2), 244. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v9i2.5592
Ashady, S., & Dudy, A. A. (2025). Prinsip Plurium Litis Consortium: Bagaimana Parameternya Dalam Gugatan Wanprestasi (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Selong Nomor 117/Pdt.G/2024/PN Sel.). Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum, 10(1), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v10i1.234
Dkk, O. (2024). Beyond efficiency: Establishing social justice as a fundamental and ethical necessity for legal certainty in the execution of mortgage rights. ICCLI, 255–267.
Azzahra, S. F., & Badriyah, S. M. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemenang Lelang atas Objek Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan. Lex Renaissance, 8(1), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol8.iss1.art10
Hariyanto, M. F., & Wahjoeono, D. (2023). Akibat Hukum Asas Itikad Baik dalam Suatu Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Journal Evidence of Law, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v2i2.276
Junaedi, B., Tjoanda, M., & Berlianty, T. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum pada Debitur atas Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia melalui Parate Eksekusi. PATTIMURA Legal Journal, 1(2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6433
Kosasih, D. (2022). Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(1), 114–135.
Lestari, C. R. (2017). Kredit Macet, Eksekusi, Hak Tanggungan, Parate Eksekusi. 19(1), 81–96.
Mawaddah, L. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum dan Tanggung Jawab Bank terhadap Pemenang Lelang atas Barang Lelang yang Digugat oleh Penjamin (Studi Putusan MA Nomor 159Pk/Pdt/2004).
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
Murni, Y., Suharizal, S., & Benni, B. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Pemenang Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan pada Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL) Pekanbaru. Simbur Cahaya, 25(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v25i1.321
Nuralisha, M. A., & Mahmudah, S. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Hukum dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan Apabila Debitur Wanprestasi. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2364
Nurhasanah, D. (2025). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Kreditur dalam Kasus Cidera Janji Perjanjian Kredit: Studi Perbandingan KUHPerdata dan Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung. JHM, 6(1), 137–145.
Oktaviana, S. (2026). Kewirausahaan dalam Lingkup Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia. CV. Dunia Penerbitan Buku.
Putra, W., & Widjaja, H. (2019). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian dalam Penyaluran Kredit (Studi Kasus di Bank BRI Cabang Semarang). Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2018.v3.i1.p81-96
Sukmaya, M. A., Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemenang Lelang Objek Hak Tanggungan dalam Hal Eksekusi Terhalang oleh Gugatan Ditinjau dari Hukum Jaminan. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 8(2), 204–229. https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v8i2.3605