Efektivitas Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur dalam Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia akibat Wanprestasi: Studi pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Tunas Muda Effectiveness of Legal Protection for Creditors in the Execution of Fiduciary Security Due to Default: A Study at Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Tunas Muda
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1876-1889
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v4i4.8599
Viewed: 36 times
Downloaded: 18 times
We cordially invite qualified professionals to join LYAS Publisher as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will play a vital role in maintaining and enhancing the quality of our publications. If you are interested, please complete the following form: Editors & Reviewers
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you require any further information regarding the submission process or have additional questions.
Authors:
Muhammad Ferdy Fahriza Jusuf1*, Nirwan Junus2, Sri Nanang Meiske Kamba3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The execution of fiduciary security at the Tunas Muda Savings and Loan Cooperative frequently encounters legal and factual obstacles despite being regulated under Law No. 42 of 1999, and has become increasingly complex following Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, which restricts creditors’ unilateral authority to execute collateral. This study aims to analyze the legal effectiveness of creditor rights protection and to identify obstacles in the execution process of fiduciary security at the Tunas Muda Savings and Loan Cooperative. The research employs a socio-legal approach with an empirical legal research design, using primary data obtained through interviews and observations, and secondary data collected through document study, all of which are analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques. The findings show that the legal effectiveness of fiduciary security execution is not yet optimal; the main obstacles include the non-registration of collateral objects, low legal awareness among debtors, limited litigation costs, and collateral objects that have been transferred or have depreciated in value. These results indicate that Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 provides greater protection for debtors but simultaneously reduces efficiency and legal certainty for creditors by requiring court proceedings when default is disputed. The study concludes that enhanced compliance with fiduciary security registration by cooperatives and regulatory improvements are needed to balance protection between creditors and debtors so that fiduciary security execution can proceed more efficiently and fairly.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Armia, M. S. (2022). Penentuan Metode dan Pendekatan Penelitian Hukum. Kajian Konstitusi Indonesia (LKKI).
Farochah, L., Ismail, Y., & Sulatri, K. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Debitur Wanprestasi terhadap Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Yurijaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 7(2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.51213/yurijaya.v7i2.165
Hannan, A. (2025). The role of mediation in alternative dispute resolution as an effective solution for non-litigation dispute resolution. INTERDISIPLIN: Journal of Qualitative and Quantitative Research, 2(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.61166/interdisiplin.v2i3.81
Huri, D. (2022). Perkembangan Konsep Dasar Jaminan Fidusia dalam Praktik. Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum, 3(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v3i3.145
Jadidah, F. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Kreditur terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019). IBLAM Law Review, 2(2), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v2i2.69
Jailani, M. S. (2023). Teknik Pengumpulan Data dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. IHSAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57
Johan, M. P. S., & Hakim, L. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Perdata oleh Konsumen yang Tidak Memiliki Legal Standing kepada Perusahaan Pembiayaan Kendaraan Bermotor (Studi Putusan Nomor: 14/Pdt.G/2023/PN TJK). JLEB: Journal of Law Education and Business, 2(1), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.57235/jleb.v2i1.1888
Khozairi, M., Bari, A., Farid, M., & Fauzan. (2025). Penanganan Kredit Tidak Sehat terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Koperasi Kspps Nuri Cabang Pasean Pamekasan. Prospeks Prosiding Pengabdian Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah, 4(1), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.32806/pps.v4i1.859
Lende, S. T., Usman, S. R., & Nubatonis, O. J. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Perdata Nasabah yang Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Pinjam Meminjam Uang pada Koperasi Nasari Kecamatan Oebobo Kota Kupang. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 13(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47709/jhb.v13i03.4057
Muhammad, P. R., Sari, D. K., & Abadiyah, R. (2025). The influence of brand trust, promotion and E-WOM on purchasing decisions at Soes Merdeka Stores Sidoarjo [Pengaruh Brand Trust, Promosi dan E-WOM terhadap Keputusan Pembelian pada Toko Soes Merdeka Sidoarjo]. UMSIDA Preprints Server, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21070/ups.8947
Muttaqim, H., & Dev, M. E. (2025). Koperasi dan UMKM: Pilar Penggerak Ekonomi Indonesia. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Nainggolan, H. V., Kamello, T., Purba, H., & Leviza, J. (2023). Penerapan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dalam Putusan Pengadilan Terkait Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(4), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i4.155
Puspitasari, D., Sahril, I., & Nesseri, J. (2024). Kepastian Hukum bagi Kreditur Sehubungan Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 yang Berdampak Kerugian Finansial. Jurnal Hukum Legalita, 6(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.47637/legalita.v6i2.1470
Rahmawati, S. F., & Subrata, R. (2024). Pemahaman terhadap Wanprestasi Debitur: Implikasi terhadap Manajemen Risiko Kredit di Sektor Perbankan. Hukum Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(3), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v1i3.345
Rohmat, A. B. (2015). Analisis Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Koperasi dalam Undang-Undang Koperasi (Studi Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 1992 dan Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2012). Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 2(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v2i1.1424
Rongrean, A. B., Kannapadang, D., & Matasik, A. L. (2023). Analisis Sistem dan Prosedur Pemberian Kredit di Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Balo’ta Cabang Rinding Allo. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 3(3), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.55606/jebaku.v3i3.2855
Setiawan, I., & Jody, P. (2021). Tata Kelola dan Keanggotaan Koperasi: Studi Kasus pada Pedagang Pasar Blora, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis Indonesia (JABISI), 2(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.55122/jabisi.v2i2.285
Sitompul, R. W., Sitorus, N., Devi, R. S., & Hamonangan, A. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditur pada Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 4(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v4i1.1445
Sriono. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Pemberi Fidusia terhadap Benda Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 7(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v7i2.1563
Suryadi, S., & Sudiyana, S. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pihak Debitor atas Pengalihan Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Undang–Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Janiman Fidusia. Kajian Hukum, 9(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.37159/2024kh.v9.i2.33
Susanti, R. (2021). Politik Uang dalam Pemilu Ditinjau dari Perspektif Yuridis Sosiologis. Lex Renaissance, 6(3), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss3.art10
Wahyu, A. A., Fuad, F., & Machmud, A. (2024). Aspek Kepastian Hukum dalam Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v13i2.935
Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum: Studi Eksploratif di Indonesia. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390
Find the perfect home for your research! If this journal isn't the right fit, don't worry—we offer a wide range of journals covering diverse fields of study. Explore our other journals to discover the ideal platform for your work and maximize its impact. Browse now and take the next step in publishing your research:
| HOME | Yasin | AlSys | Anwarul | Masaliq | Arzusin | Tsaqofah | Ahkam | AlDyas | Mikailalsys | Edumalsys | Alsystech | AJSTEA | AJECEE | AJISD | IJHESS | IJEMT | IJECS | MJMS | MJAEI | AMJSAI | AJBMBR | AJSTM | AJCMPR | AJMSPHR | KIJST | KIJEIT | KIJAHRS |