Tinjauan Hukum mengenai Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen terhadap PT TIKI di BPSK WKP II Provinsi Banten (Studi Kasus: Putusan No. 175K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2021) Legal Review of Consumer Dispute Resolution Against PT TIKI at BPSK WKP II, Banten Province (Case Study: Decision No. 175K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2021)
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
1148-1161
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v4i3.7399
Viewed: 249 times
Downloaded: 145 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Neneng Adelia1, Mohammad Hifni2*, Safiulloh Safiulloh3 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The limited number of studies on consumer dispute resolution through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) underpins this research, despite its significant implications for consumer rights protection and legal certainty in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the mechanism of consumer dispute resolution against PT Citra Van Titipan Kilat (TIKI) at BPSK WKP II, Banten Province, and to evaluate the effectiveness of BPSK decisions in enforcing business actors’ legal responsibility based on the principle of strict liability in civil law. A qualitative case study approach was employed, drawing on BPSK and Supreme Court rulings related to case No. 175K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2021, as well as interviews with BPSK members and affected consumers. Data were collected through official document analysis, semi-structured interviews, and participatory observation, then analyzed using thematic and comparative techniques. The findings reveal that PT TIKI was proven to have altered delivery services without consumer consent, causing material and immaterial losses, and that BPSK effectively applied arbitration as a fast, efficient, and low-cost dispute resolution mechanism. These findings support the theory of strict liability in civil law and affirm BPSK’s role as an effective quasi-judicial body in upholding consumer rights and ensuring legal certainty, although enforcement of decisions still requires supervision and clear limitations of authority. The implications include theoretical contributions to the literature on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and strict liability of business actors, as well as practical contributions in the form of recommendations for BPSK, business actors, and policymakers to strengthen dispute resolution mechanisms and consumer protection.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ali, M., & Hifni, M. (2025). Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pengesampingan Pasal 1266 KUH Perdata dalam Kasus Pengakhiran Suatu Perjanjian Karena Terjadinya Wanprestasi. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.877
Andriani, W. (2024). Reviewing the Accountability Practices of Village Funds: Case Study from Indonesia. AKUNSIKA: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.31963/akunsika.v5i2.4590
Aprila, D., Andriani, W., & Ananto, R. P. (2023). Financial Management of Nagari Owned Enterprises (BUMNAG) and Its Impact on Community Welfare. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v16i2.4461
Asyiqin, H. (2024). Constraints of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) in Resolving Disputes. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 10(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v10i1.5655
Fadillah, F. D., Aslami, I. F., & Safiulloh, S. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Penetapan Alasan Pembelaan Terpaksa Berdasarkan Surat Tap-209/M.6.10/Eoh.1/12/23 (di Kejaksaan Negeri Serang). Hukum Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(4), 2024. https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v1i4.786
Gofar, A., Hifni, M., Jahiri, M., & Darmawan, D. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Akibat Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(4), 3989–4004. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i4.1963
Harahap, S. K. (2024). Analisis Kewenangan Pengadilan Terhadap Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Dalam Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 7(2), 1018–1034. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9262
Haryani, A. T., Sarjiyati, S., & Purwati, Y. (2020). Peran BPSK Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Konsumen. YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v6i2.53
Jessica, & Gunadi, A. (2023). Penilaian Kinerja Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 175K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2021. Unes Law Review, 6(1), 3147–3153. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1
Leonard, B. M. A., & Anindita, S. L. (2023). Kompetensi Mutlak Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Dalam Sengketa Lelang Barang Gadai: Studi Putusan Nomor 16 Pk/Pdt.Sus-Bpsk/2020. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 53(3). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol53.no3.1528
Lestari, M. A., Meliala, D. A. S. W., Anudiwanti, P., & Amalina, N. N. (2021). Optimalisasi Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Dalam Upaya Proteksi Hak Konsumen Di Ranah Siber. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 2(4), 309–328. https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/
Manullang, G. G., Harianto, D., & Aflah, A. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Antara Alvarendra Ataya Anas Dengan PT Citra Van Titipan Kilat (TIKI) (Analisa Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 175K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2021). Acta Law Journal, 2(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.32734/alj.v2i1.15473
Marbun, D. Y. M., Suryamah, A., & Suwandono, A. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Mengenai Penjualan Wafer Cheese Nabati Kadaluwarsa Di Toserba Asia Garut Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education, 2(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.55606/concept.v2i2.312
Rehullah, A., Wesley, I., Agustin, K., Rahmat, N., & Puspitasari, R. (2021). Analisis Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) yang telah Dibatalkan Mahkamah Agung RI (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 1212/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020/PN.Sby.). Jurnal Lex Spesialis, 1(1), 69–75. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/jlsp/index
Rimanda, R. (2019). Keberadaan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Sebagai Lembaga Quasi Yudisial di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 4(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v4n1.2
Sugiyono. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitati, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukamto, N. S., Widiarty, W. S., & Fauzan, F. (2024). Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dalam Mengadili Sengketa yang Bersumber pada Wanprestasi dalam Jual Beli (Analisa Pada Putusan Nomor 721 K/PDT.SUS-BPSK/2020 Juncto Putusan Nomor 689 /PDT.SUS-BPSK/2019/PN JKT UTR Juncto Putusan BPSK Nomor 0. Action Research Literate, 8(6), 1–12. https://arl.ridwaninstitute.co.id/index.php/arl
Thiasel, C., Media, Y., & Zarfinal, Z. (2024). Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di Kota Padang. Jurnal HAM Dan Ilmu Hukum (Jurisprudentia), 7(1), 1–19. https://jurisprudentia.bunghatta.ac.id
Udjan, B. G. L., & Hermawan, A. (2024). The Effective Role of BPSK in Resolving Consumer Disputes in Accordance with UUPK: Legal and Theoretical Perspectives. Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v4i1.24488
Yentifa, A., Andriani, W., Jr, S. R., Aprila, D., & Sofia, G. (2023). Village Fund Accounting Model in Realizing Nagari Financial Accountability. Ilomata International Journal of Tax & Accounting, 4(4), 716–729. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v4i4.895