Tanggung Jawab Lembaga Pemasyarakatan dalam Pembinaan Narapidana Residivis Kajian terhadap UU Pasal 2 No. 22 Tahun 2022 The Responsibility of Correctional Institutions in Fostering Recidivist Prisoners: A Study of Law No. 22 of 2022, Article 2
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study is motivated by the limited specific research on the responsibilities of correctional institutions in rehabilitating recidivist inmates, despite the issue having significant implications for reducing repeat offenses and strengthening the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The objective is to analyze the legal responsibilities of correctional institutions and evaluate the implementation of Article 2 of Law No. 22 of 2022 in the rehabilitation of recidivist inmates. The research employs a normative juridical method with descriptive analysis, using legal documents, legislation, and relevant literature as primary and secondary data sources. Data were collected through document studies and analyzed using legal interpretation and qualitative descriptive techniques. The findings reveal that, normatively, correctional institutions bear legal, moral, and social responsibilities in rehabilitating recidivists. However, implementation is hindered by issues such as overcrowding, limited human resources, inadequate facilities, and generic rehabilitation programs. The study concludes that recidivist rehabilitation requires more personalized, structured, and collaborative strategies to fulfill the goals of the correctional system. The research offers theoretical contributions to the development of correctional law and provides practical recommendations for policymakers and correctional officers to strengthen individualized rehabilitation and enhance inter-agency coordination. Furthermore, it opens avenues for future studies on alternative rehabilitation models for high-risk recidivists.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Ciek Julyati Hisyam, Dina Lestari, Hilyatussholehah Hilyatussholehah, Ona Rangratu, Ridho Syafiq, & Silviana Dwi Anggraeni. (2023). Kebermanfaatan Tahanan Pendamping (Tamping) dalam Operasional Sistem Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 3(1), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v3i1.2362
Dewi, S., Linchia, D., Heningdyah, L., Kusumawardhani, N., Jaelani, A., Noya, S. W., Mendrofa, H. P., & Penelitian, A. (2024). Efektivitas Pemidanaan Penjara dalam Mencegah Tindak Pidana Berulang di Indonesia The Effectiveness of Imprisonment in Preventing Recurrence of Crime in Indonesia. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(12), 4568–4573. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i12.6567
Galuh Mahardika, M. D., & Nur Ramadhan, F. (2021). Pembelajaran IPS sebagai penguat nasionalisme dalam menghadapi tantangan di era globalisasi. Jurnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS, 6(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.17977/um022v6i22021p78
Habibi, M., Febriana, N., Karima, N. K., Sudjatmiko, B., Ilmu, M., & Universitas, H. (2025). Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.6. No.4 (2025) Tema/Edisi : Hukum Perdata (Bulan Keempat) https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/. 6(4), 1–18.
Harini, M., & Rahmat, D. (2025). Peran Hakim Pada Proses Penemuan Hukum Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Keadilan Berdasarkan Kode Etik Hakim. Journal Evidence Of Law, 4(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i1.1097
Herdriani, P., & Samputra, P. L. (2021). Pengaruh Layanan Rehabilitasi Narkotika terhadap Kualitas Hidup Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 21(3), 1237. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v21i3.1487
Juliana, E., & Usmita, F. (n.d.). Pengalaman Proses Resosialisasi Mantan Warga Binaan Rumah Tahanan Kelas IIB Siak. 737–742.
Kurnia, D. (2017). Analisis Signifikansi Leverage Dan Kebijakan Deviden Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(2), 12–21.
Mufti, E. A., & Riyanto, O. S. (2023). Peran Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Upaya Rehabilitasi Narapidana Untuk Mengurangi Tingkat Residivis. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 2425–2438. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.4026
Muhammad, A. A. (2023). Ancaman Pidana Mati Dalam Prespektif Tujuan Pemidanaan. Al-Qisth Law Review, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24853/al-qisth.7.1.1-19
Muhammad Nawwar, W., & Cepaka Warih, W. (2024). Implementasi rehabilitasi medis untuk mengurangi dependensi terhadap narapidana narkotika di Lapas Narkotika Kelas IIA Cipinang. Wido Cepaka Warih INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4, 4925–4938.
Oktarina, L. (2022). Dalam Mencegah Residivisme Di Balai. 5(5), 56–73.
Perkasa, R. E., P, N. S., & Turisno, B. E. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual/Beli Online (E-Commerce) Di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(4), 3.
Ridha Nur Arifa. (2023). Pemidanaan Terhadap Residivis Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dalam Keadaan Memberatkan Di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Tapaktuan. Jurnal Tahqiqa : Jurnal Ilmiah Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 17(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.61393/tahqiqa.v17i1.83
Rivanie, S. S., Muchtar, S., Muin, A. M., Prasetya, A. M. D., & Rizky, A. (2022). Perkembangan Teori-teori Tujuan Pemidanaan. Halu Oleo Law Review, 6(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v6i2.4
Rizki Hamzah Siregar, A. Z. (2024). Prestisius Hukum Brilliance Prestisius Hukum Brilliance. Prestisius Hukum Brilliance, 6(2), 92.
Sri Puji Ganefati, Herman Sanjtoko, Sigid Sudaryanto, Sutedjo, S., Sardjito Eko, Haryono, H., & Sugianto, S. (2023). UPAYA PENGENDALIAN PENYAKIT MENULAR LAPAS KELAS IIB SLEMAN MELALUI PENYULUHAN KESEHATAN, DESINFEKSI KUMAN UDARA RUANGAN Di BLOK TAHANAN, DAN PENYEHATAN AIR. J-ABDI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(6), 1177–1186. https://doi.org/10.53625/jabdi.v3i6.6770
Sumarna, D., & Kadriah, A. (2023). Penelitian Kualitatif Terhadap Hukum Empiris. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 16(02), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.59582/sh.v16i02.730
Tunggu, R. (2023). Implikasi Yuridis Dianutnya Causal Stelsel Terhadap Kekuatan Mengikat Sertifikat Tanah Objek Hak Tanggungan. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 7546–7557. https://www.review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/1650%0Ahttps://www.review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/download/1650/1329




















