Analisis Penguasaan Indikator Keterampilan Membaca Teks Eksposisi Ditinjau dari Tingkat Minat Baca Siswa Kelas X SMA Analysis of Mastery of Expository Text Reading Skill Indicators from the Perspective of Grade X High School Students' Reading Interest Level
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mastery of expository text reading skills has received attention in various studies, but research specifically mapping the achievement of reading indicators based on students’ levels of reading interest remains limited. This study aims to analyze the mastery of expository text reading skill indicators in relation to the reading interest levels of Grade X senior high school students. The study employed a quantitative approach with a descriptive-comparative design, involving 44 students consisting of 22 students with high reading interest and 22 students with low reading interest selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a Likert-scale reading interest questionnaire and an expository text reading skills test covering seven indicators and were subsequently analyzed using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance at a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that students with high reading interest obtained a mean score of 88.45, categorized as very good, whereas students with low reading interest obtained a mean score of 72.00, categorized as more than adequate. The difference in expository text reading skills between the two groups was significant, with F(1,40) = 89.78 and p < 0.001. These findings indicate that the level of reading interest is associated with differences in the mastery of expository text reading skills. The study concludes by emphasizing the importance of reading interest in supporting students’ ability to comprehend expository texts. As a practical implication, teachers need to identify students’ levels of reading interest and design reading instruction that is diagnostic, progressive, and tailored to the learning needs of each group.

Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
dos Santos Zanotelli S. (2026)Construction and validity of an online course for nurses on the analysis and interpretation of prenatal laboratory testsCogitare Enfermagem, 31
-
Silva A. (2026)Improving rotor-casing rubbing detection performance with time-frequency domain-based accelerometer signal processing methodologiesResults in Engineering, 32
-
Alemán Madrigal L.E. (2026)Delivery Platforms and the Work Test: an Analysis from the Perspective of Nicaraguan Labor LawRevista Latinoamericana De Derecho Social, 22(43)
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Afandi, A. A., Sholehah, A., Hasanah, K., & Mas’odi, M. (2025). Inovasi Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Efektif untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Membaca di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (ABDIRA), 5(3), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.31004/abdira.v5i3.786
Afriyanti, A., & Tressyalina. (2019). Korelasi Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman dan Keterampilan Menulis Teks Eksposisi. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 8(3), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.24036/107455-019883
Agustin, K., & Ardiyani, D. K. (2024). Penerapan Model Kollaboratives Schreiben dengan Metode PORPE pada Keterampilan Menulis Bahasa Jerman Siswa Kelas XI SMA Taruna Nala. Singular: Journal of Pedagogical Language, Literature, and Cultural Studies, 1(3), 126–141. https://journal-singular.net/index.php/main/article/view/20
Bruggink, M., Swart, N., van der Lee, A., & Segers, E. (2025). Evidence-based didactic principles for digital reading. In Teaching reading comprehension in a digital world: Evidence-based contributions using PIRLS and digital texts (pp. 19–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75121-9_2
Claes, R., Laga, J., Denies, K., Bleukx, N., Dockx, J., Van Keer, H., & Aesaert, K. (2024). The interplay between students’ home literacy environment, reading attitudes and comprehension: A serial mediation analysis using PIRLS 2021 data. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 12, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00233-8
Delgado, P., Anmarkrud, Ø., Avila, V., Altamura, L., Chireac, S. M., Pérez, A., & Salmerón, L. (2022). Learning from text and video blogs: Comprehension effects on secondary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5249–5275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10819-2
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Fitria, W. (2019). Reading interest and reading comprehension: A correlational study. Jurnal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies, 4(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v4i1.1333
Florit, E., De Carli, P., Rodà, A., Domenicale, S., & Mason, L. (2023). Precursors of reading text comprehension from paper and screen in first graders: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 36, 1821–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10327-w
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Teaching-and-Researching-Reading/Grabe-Stoller/p/book/9781138847941
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216655542
Kaygısız, Ç. (2025). Comparision of digital and printed text reading process. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 22709–22733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13668-5
Khairiah, C. Y., & Tressyalina. (2019). Korelasi Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman dengan Keterampilan Menulis Teks Deskripsi Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 31 Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 8(3), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.24036/107457-019883
Kurniati, R., Daud, A., & Masyhur. (2023). Reading interest and reading comprehension ability: The correlational study in secondary education. Journal of Education, Language Innovation, and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.37058/jelita.v2i1.6547
Lee, J., Kim, D., & Kim, H. (2026). Profile analysis of students with reading comprehension difficulties. Asia Pacific Education Review, 27(3), 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-025-10076-9
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Romaito, E. R. R., Siregar, R. K., & Ramadhani, Y. R. (2024). The relationship between students’ reading interest and critical reading skills among eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 5 Padangsidimpuan. ETANIC Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.55266/journaletanic.v2i2.390
Sari, T. H. (2023). The learning exposition text reading skills using test techniques through digital literacy media. DISCUSSANT: Journal of Language and Literature Learning, 1(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.55909/dj3l.v1i2.12
Solis, M., Kulesz, P., & Williams, K. (2022). Response to intervention for high school students: Examining baseline word reading skills and reading comprehension outcomes. Annals of Dyslexia, 72(2), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-022-00253-5
Springer, S. E., Harris, S., & Dole, J. A. (2017). From surviving to thriving: Four research-based principles to build students’ reading interest. The Reading Teacher, 71(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1581
Wahyudi, R., & Rozimela, Y. (2024). The reciprocal teaching and reading interest impact on students’ reading comprehension. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 6(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v6i3.22593


















