Proses Rujuk dalam Budaya Minangkabau Perspektif Fikih Munakahat The Reconciliation Process in Minangkabau Culture from the Perspective of Islamic Marriage Jurisprudence

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 4260-4281
Download PDF
Published: Aug 28, 2026
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11892
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Romizan1*, Shafra2
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Romizan
UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
Shafra
UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Abstract

Although marital reconciliation has been widely studied from the perspective of Islamic law, studies specifically examining the reconciliation process in Minangkabau culture and its relationship with Islamic marital jurisprudence remain limited. This study aimed to analyze the reconciliation process in Minangkabau culture from the perspective of Islamic marital jurisprudence. This study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical design and a literature review method. Data were obtained through documentation of books, journal articles, research findings, and other relevant written sources and were subsequently analyzed descriptively using deductive reasoning. The findings identified two forms of marital reconciliation in Minangkabau culture: reconciliation through a customary ceremony and reconciliation without a customary ceremony. Reconciliation through a customary ceremony involves niniak mamak and family deliberation and, under certain circumstances, is associated with the bajapuik tradition. Meanwhile, reconciliation without a customary ceremony places greater emphasis on intention, communication between spouses, mutual agreement, and family approval. From the perspective of Islamic marital jurisprudence, the implementation of reconciliation is associated with talak raj‘i, the ‘iddah period, and compliance with Islamic legal provisions. These findings demonstrate the relationship between custom and religion reflected in the principle of Adat Basandi Syarak, Syarak Basandi Kitabullah. This study concludes that custom can function as a social mechanism supporting the reconciliation process between spouses, provided that its implementation remains consistent with the provisions of Islamic marital jurisprudence. These findings broaden Islamic family law scholarship on the integration of customary norms and religious provisions in reconciliation practices and provide opportunities for field research involving spouses, niniak mamak, religious leaders, and representatives of the Office of Religious Affairs.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Citation data unavailable from the configured source
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Aji A.S. (2026)
    Dietary vitamin D intake and serum 25(OH)D concentrations in Minangkabau pregnant women: results from the vitamin D pregnant mothers (VDPM) cohort study in Indonesia
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 26(1)
  2. Kambhampaty A.K. (2026)
    Postcards from Home: Ethnographic poetry collection
    Anthropology and Humanism, 51(2)
  3. Kwon K. (2026)
    Extr-im reduplicative pattern of the Russian short-form adjectives
    Russian Linguistics, 50(1)

Article Details

How to Cite
Romizan, & Shafra. (2026). Proses Rujuk dalam Budaya Minangkabau Perspektif Fikih Munakahat. AHKAM, 5(4), 4260-4281. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11892

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Agustina, A. M. (2024). Protecting women’s rights in exogamous society: Mahram in Minangkabau customs. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 17(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2024.17204

Alfarid, A., Junior, C. T., & Ramadani, P. (2022). Implikasi penetapan Adat Basandi Syarak–Syarak Basandi Kitabullah dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2022 tentang Sumatra Barat terhadap politik hukum pemerintah daerah Sumatra Barat. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(10), 776–794. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i10.325

Alhkarni, A., & Yuriska, N. (2024). Minangkabau customary marriage traditions: Integration of custom and sharia principles in the perspective of Islamic law. USRATY: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 2(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.30983/usraty.v2i2.8834

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Firmansyah, G., Asiyah, M. R., Nadila, P., & Hasanah, P. D. (2023). Implementasi hukum adat dalam prosesi perkawinan adat Minangkabau. Uniku Law Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/ulr.v1i1.13

Fusch, P. I., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Social Change, 10(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.5590/JOSC.2018.10.1.02

Hidayat, R., Fatmariza, F., Dewi, S. F., & S, N. (2023). Pergeseran peran mamak kaum ke mamak di luar kaum dalam prosesi pernikahan adat. Journal of Education, Cultural and Politics, 3(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.24036/jecco.v3i1.142

Hoirunnisah, I., & Zuraidah. (2025). Fenomena rujuk setelah talak tiga: Kajian hukum keluarga Islam. Journal of Sharia and Legal Science, 3(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.61994/jsls.v3i1.940

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Muhibbulloh, M. Z., Khoiroh, D. N., & Darojad, A. R. (2021). Hak istri dalam rujuk menurut fikih empat mazhab dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (perspektif maqasid al-shari’ah). The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law and Civil Law, 2(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.51675/jaksya.v2i2.168

Ronanda, Y., Munadi, M., & Usamah, U. (2023). Kawin pantang pada masyarakat Minangkabau persfektif hukum keluarga Islam. Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 8(2), 154–176. https://doi.org/10.24235/mahkamah.v8i2.14560

Rufaida, A. (2019). Hak istri menolak rujuk perspektif Islam dan gender. Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam, Gender dan Anak, 14(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.24090/yinyang.v14i2.2944

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4%3C334::AID-NUR9%3E3.0.CO;2-G

Siadio, S., & Yenti, E. (2023). Pengaruh intervensi hukum adat Minangkabau terhadap prinsip dan praktik hukum Islam. JISRAH: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Syariah, 4(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.31958/jisrah.v4i2.10139

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sulistio, D., Soehadha, M., Mubin, M. N., Mundzir, A., & Mustajab, M. (2026). Discursive contestations between adat and Islam: Reinterpreting the living law of intra-clan marriage in Minangkabau. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 19(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2026.19103

Suryantoro, D. D., & Rofiq, A. (2022). Hak mantan isteri menolak rujuk mantan suami menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam. AHSANA MEDIA: Jurnal Pemikiran, Pendidikan dan Penelitian Ke-Islaman, 8(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.31102/ahsanamedia.8.1.2022.24-34

Syaf, M. N. (2024). Studi komparasi konsep rujuk menurut Imam Madzhab dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 15(2), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.30739/darussalam.v15i2.2930

Umar, M. C., & Riza, Y. (2022). Peran ninik mamak, mamak, dan kamanakan di Minangkabau. Jurnal Budaya Nusantara, 5(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.36456/b.nusantara.vol5.no3.a5733

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Yustim, Y., Nelisma, Y., Silvianetri, S., & Mazida, Y. (2022). Larangan perkawinan sesuku dalam budaya Minangkabau dan implikasinya terhadap konseling budaya. Jurnal Sekretari Universitas Pamulang, 9(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.32493/skr.v9i1.18705