Tradisi Larangan Menikah dengan Orang Sekaum dengan Mantan Pasangan di Nagari Padang Laweh Perspektif ‘Urf The Tradition of Prohibiting Marriage to a Person of the Same Clan as a Former Spouse in Nagari Padang Laweh from the Perspective of ‘Urf

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 4237-4259
Download PDF
Published: Aug 28, 2026
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11891
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Lestari1*, Shafra2
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Lestari
UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi
Shafra
UIN Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Abstract

Although customary marriage traditions have been widely studied, research on the prohibition against marrying a member of a former spouse’s clan, whether following divorce or the spouse’s death, and its status from the perspective of ‘urf remains limited. This study aimed to analyze the implementation of the tradition prohibiting marriage to a member of a former spouse’s clan in Nagari Padang Laweh, Koto VII Subdistrict, Sijunjung Regency, and to determine its status from the perspective of ‘urf. This study employed a qualitative approach using field research. Informants were selected purposively, while data were collected through interviews and observation. The data were analyzed descriptively and inductively through the stages of transcription, data categorization, description of the findings, and conclusion drawing. The findings showed that the prohibition applied to men and women whose marriages had ended through either divorce or the death of their spouse, preventing them from marrying a member of their former spouse’s clan. This tradition aims to preserve raso, family harmony, clan honor, and interclan relations and is accompanied by the imposition of customary sanctions on violators. From the perspective of ‘urf, the tradition is categorized as ‘urf ‘amali based on its form and ‘urf khāṣṣ based on its scope and may be regarded as ‘urf ṣaḥīḥ provided that its implementation does not conflict with Islamic law. These findings clarify the status of this tradition while broadening the understanding of the relationship between customary norms and Islamic law in the marital practices of the Minangkabau community.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Citation data unavailable from the configured source
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Hamimi E. (2026)
    The ecosystem STEM education learning activity: Orang Utan natural habitat in Kalimantan forest
    Aip Conference Proceedings, 3423(1)
  2. Nuzuli A.K. (2027)
    Social system resonance communication in creating conservation sustainability Lubuk Larangan, Kerinci Regency
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  3. Khalil M.K.N. (2026)
    Prevalence and Factors Associated With Modern Contraceptive Use Among Orang Asli Women in Peninsular Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 38(1), 69-76

Article Details

How to Cite
Lestari, & Shafra. (2026). Tradisi Larangan Menikah dengan Orang Sekaum dengan Mantan Pasangan di Nagari Padang Laweh Perspektif ‘Urf. AHKAM, 5(4), 4237-4259. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11891

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Al Amin, F., Syofiani, S., Rahmat, A., Novita, F., & Sandi, L. (2023). Larangan Pernikahan Sesuku di Minangkabau. Jurnal Ilmiah Langue and Parole, 7(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.36057/jilp.v7i1.615

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021b). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Destuliadi, D. (2022). Larangan Perkawinan Sesuku dalam Masyarakat Minangkabau Ditinjau dari Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam. IJOCE: Indonesia Journal of Civic Education, 3(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.31539/ijoce.v3i1.6632

Firmansyah, G., Asiyah, M. R., Nadila, P., & Hasanah, P. D. (2023). Implementasi Hukum Adat dalam Prosesi Perkawinan Adat Minangkabau. Uniku Law Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/ulr.v1i1.13

Fitri, A. (2021). Penerimaan Diri dengan Konseling Realita terhadap Larangan Perkawinan Sesuku di Minangkabau. Ristekdik: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 6(1), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.31604/ristekdik.2021.v6i1.102-108

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Haq, A., Hayatudin, A., & Yunus, M. (2024). Tinjauan Hukum Adat tentang Larangan Perkawinan Satu Suku di Minangkabau Berdasarkan Kaidah ‘Urf. Bandung Conference Series: Islamic Family Law, 4(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsifl.v4i2.14903

Mardius, M., & Maulida, K. (2022). Perkawinan Sesuku di Nagari Sikacua Tengah Kabupaten Padang Pariaman dalam Perspektif Hukum Adat Minangkabau dan Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal de Jure, 14(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.36277/jurnaldejure.v14i2.764

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Oktafiani, S., & Hamdani, F. F. R. S. (2024). Praktek Larangan Perkawinan Sesuku di Nagari Aia Bangih Ditinjau dari UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Jurnal Riset Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrhki.v4i1.3763

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Putri, R. A., & Helfi, H. (2026). Larangan Menikahi Kerabat Mantan Istri Sesuku dalam Adat Masyarakat Nagari Koto Lamo, Kecamatan Kapur IX Perspektif ‘Urf. AHKAM, 5(3), 2334–2358. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10364

Rahmi, M., Fauziah, E., & Rosyadi, F. F. (2022). Larangan Perkawinan Sesuku di Nagari Bungo Tanjuang Kabupaten Tanah Datar Sumatera Barat Ditinjau dari UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Bandung Conference Series: Islamic Family Law, 2(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsifl.v2i1.628

Rizka, M., & Ramdan, A. (2022). Analisis Hukum Islam terhadap Tradisi Pitih Japuik dalam Perkawinan Adat Minangkabau Pariaman. Jurnal Riset Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrhki.vi.900

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Yustim, Y., Nelisma, Y., Silvianetri, S., & Mazida, Y. (2022). Larangan Perkawinan Sesuku dalam Budaya Minangkabau dan Implikasinya terhadap Konseling Budaya. Jurnal Sekretari Universitas Pamulang, 9(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.32493/skr.v9i1.18705

Zulkifli, Z., Zikri, A., Artiningsih, D. W., Zainuddin, Z., & Helim, A. (2024). Revitalizing ‘urf in state legal development: The case of Minangkabaunese marriage traditions. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(2), 841–862. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.11034