Kewenangan Mahkamah Kostitusi dalam Memutus Usulan Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 313-326
Download PDF
Published: May 24, 2023
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/ahkam.v2i2.1141
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 450 times
Downloaded: 412 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Faisal Faturrahman Nurjamil1
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Faisal Faturrahman Nurjamil
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Abstract

Impeachment is an indictment or indictment against the president or a high-ranking state official from office. One of the powers of the Constitutional Court, which is commonly referred to as an obligation, is to give a decision on the opinion of the House of Representatives regarding alleged violations by the President and or Vice President. The nature of the decision issued by the Constitutional Court is juridically final. The decision of the Constitutional Court lies in its relative nature or has no binding legal force for the People's Consultative Assembly as a state institution that is at the end of the case process of dismissal of the President and / or Vice President during his term of office to follow the decision of the Constitutional Court, except in the case of holding a plenary meeting as proposed by the House of Representatives. This is an implication of Article 7B paragraph (6) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. The authority or obligation of the Constitutional Court towards  the Impeachment proposal  by the House of Representatives is a normative effort so as not to repeat the dismissal of the President and / or Vice President which is only based on slander and suspicion in order to satisfy political martyrdom.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Lailam T. (2026)
    Constitutional Complaint on Criminal and Civil Court Judgements: The German Judicial Practices of the Bundesverfassungsgericht and Proposal for the Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
    Constitutional Review, 12(1), 70-117
  2. Zulfi M.F. (2026)
    The Idea of Formal Review by the Constitutional Court of Laws Enacting Government Regulations in Lieu of Law: Questioning Parliamentary Objectivity
    Jurnal Konstitusi, 23(1), 25-54
  3. Widodo (2026)
    Restitution Mechanism for Rape Victims in Aceh: An Analysis of The Normative Shortcomings of Qanun Jinayat
    Legality Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 34(1), 67-90

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurjamil, F. F. (2023). Kewenangan Mahkamah Kostitusi dalam Memutus Usulan Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. AHKAM, 2(2), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v2i2.1141

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Dinarta, D. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Prosedur Pemberhentian Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Masa Jabatan Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. 1(2), 1–23.

Fatkhurohman. (2022). Keberlangsungan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Tentang Impeacment Presiden Pada Sidang Paripurna Majelis Permuswaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. The 5th Conference on Innovation and Application of Science and Technology (CIASTECH), Ciastech, 169–178.

Hakim, L. (2019). Kajian Filosofis Terhadap Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sebagai Lembaga Negara Berdasarkan Teori Bernegara (Bangsa Indonesia). Jurnal Majelis, 2(2), 108–126.

Hayati, K. Z. (2016). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi no. 23 – 26 / PUU – VIII / 2010 Atas Peninjauan Kembali UU. No. 27 tahun 2009 pasal 184 Tentang Hak Menyatakan Pendapat MPR / DPR / DPD dan DPRD Terkait Dengan Impeachment Presiden dan/ atau Wakil Presiden. UII, 23, 1–23.

Jumadi. (2012). Pemakzulan Presiden dan atau Wakil Presiden dalam Masa Jabatannya di Mahkamah Konstusi. Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 1(1), 105–119. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/al_daulah/article/view/1465

Ni’mah, M. D. (2012). Analisis Yuridis Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Sejarah Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(15). https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v8i15.262

Saleh, M. (2016). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas Pendapat Dpr Ri Mengenai Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 1, 1–23.

Santika, I. G. N. (2019). Presidensialisme Dan Problematika Mekanisme Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Berdasarkan UUD 1945 Pasca Perubahan (Perspektif Pergulatan Hukum Dan Politik). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v5i1.18777

Ulum, M. B. (2016). Mekanisme Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden Menurut UUd 1945 (Antara Realitas Politik dan Penegakan Konstitusi). Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(4), 131. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk747