Kewenangan Mahkamah Kostitusi dalam Memutus Usulan Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia

Main Article Content

Faisal Faturrahman Nurjamil

Abstract

Impeachment is an indictment or indictment against the president or a high-ranking state official from office. One of the powers of the Constitutional Court, which is commonly referred to as an obligation, is to give a decision on the opinion of the House of Representatives regarding alleged violations by the President and or Vice President. The nature of the decision issued by the Constitutional Court is juridically final. The decision of the Constitutional Court lies in its relative nature or has no binding legal force for the People's Consultative Assembly as a state institution that is at the end of the case process of dismissal of the President and / or Vice President during his term of office to follow the decision of the Constitutional Court, except in the case of holding a plenary meeting as proposed by the House of Representatives. This is an implication of Article 7B paragraph (6) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. The authority or obligation of the Constitutional Court towards  the Impeachment proposal  by the House of Representatives is a normative effort so as not to repeat the dismissal of the President and / or Vice President which is only based on slander and suspicion in order to satisfy political martyrdom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Scopus Citation Data

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Yahya M.A. (2026)
    THE ROLE OF EXPERT EVIDENCE AS A MEANS OF PROOF IN SHARIAH COURT CASES: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON QARINAH AND MAQAṢID AL-SHARIAH
    Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 14(1), 215-229
  2. Mustapa I. (2026)
    The Practice of Evidence Laws in Sarawak Syariah Court: Analysis of Fasakh Cases (2018-2023)
    Uum Journal of Legal Studies, 17(1), 151-164
  3. Safa’at M.A. (2025)
    The End of the Debate on MPR’s Authority to Form a Regulatory Decree (Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 66/PUU-XXI/2023)
    Jurnal Konstitusi, 22(4), 777-797

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurjamil, F. F. (2023). Kewenangan Mahkamah Kostitusi dalam Memutus Usulan Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. AHKAM, 2(2), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v2i2.1141

References

Dinarta, D. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Prosedur Pemberhentian Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Masa Jabatan Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. 1(2), 1–23.

Fatkhurohman. (2022). Keberlangsungan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Tentang Impeacment Presiden Pada Sidang Paripurna Majelis Permuswaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. The 5th Conference on Innovation and Application of Science and Technology (CIASTECH), Ciastech, 169–178.

Hakim, L. (2019). Kajian Filosofis Terhadap Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sebagai Lembaga Negara Berdasarkan Teori Bernegara (Bangsa Indonesia). Jurnal Majelis, 2(2), 108–126.

Hayati, K. Z. (2016). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi no. 23 – 26 / PUU – VIII / 2010 Atas Peninjauan Kembali UU. No. 27 tahun 2009 pasal 184 Tentang Hak Menyatakan Pendapat MPR / DPR / DPD dan DPRD Terkait Dengan Impeachment Presiden dan/ atau Wakil Presiden. UII, 23, 1–23.

Jumadi. (2012). Pemakzulan Presiden dan atau Wakil Presiden dalam Masa Jabatannya di Mahkamah Konstusi. Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 1(1), 105–119. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/al_daulah/article/view/1465

Ni’mah, M. D. (2012). Analisis Yuridis Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Sejarah Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(15). https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v8i15.262

Saleh, M. (2016). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas Pendapat Dpr Ri Mengenai Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 1, 1–23.

Santika, I. G. N. (2019). Presidensialisme Dan Problematika Mekanisme Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Berdasarkan UUD 1945 Pasca Perubahan (Perspektif Pergulatan Hukum Dan Politik). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v5i1.18777

Ulum, M. B. (2016). Mekanisme Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden Menurut UUd 1945 (Antara Realitas Politik dan Penegakan Konstitusi). Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(4), 131. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk747


Explore Our Journals
Find the most suitable journal for your research. If this journal does not fully align with the scope of your manuscript, we invite you to explore our wider portfolio of journals covering diverse fields of study. Please select one of the journals below to identify the most appropriate publication platform for your work.