Kewenangan Mahkamah Kostitusi dalam Memutus Usulan Impeachment Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Impeachment is an indictment or indictment against the president or a high-ranking state official from office. One of the powers of the Constitutional Court, which is commonly referred to as an obligation, is to give a decision on the opinion of the House of Representatives regarding alleged violations by the President and or Vice President. The nature of the decision issued by the Constitutional Court is juridically final. The decision of the Constitutional Court lies in its relative nature or has no binding legal force for the People's Consultative Assembly as a state institution that is at the end of the case process of dismissal of the President and / or Vice President during his term of office to follow the decision of the Constitutional Court, except in the case of holding a plenary meeting as proposed by the House of Representatives. This is an implication of Article 7B paragraph (6) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945. The authority or obligation of the Constitutional Court towards the Impeachment proposal by the House of Representatives is a normative effort so as not to repeat the dismissal of the President and / or Vice President which is only based on slander and suspicion in order to satisfy political martyrdom.
Downloads
Article Details

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Dinarta, D. (2016). Analisis Yuridis Prosedur Pemberhentian Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Masa Jabatan Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. 1(2), 1–23.
Fatkhurohman. (2022). Keberlangsungan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Tentang Impeacment Presiden Pada Sidang Paripurna Majelis Permuswaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. The 5th Conference on Innovation and Application of Science and Technology (CIASTECH), Ciastech, 169–178.
Hakim, L. (2019). Kajian Filosofis Terhadap Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Sebagai Lembaga Negara Berdasarkan Teori Bernegara (Bangsa Indonesia). Jurnal Majelis, 2(2), 108–126.
Hayati, K. Z. (2016). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi no. 23 – 26 / PUU – VIII / 2010 Atas Peninjauan Kembali UU. No. 27 tahun 2009 pasal 184 Tentang Hak Menyatakan Pendapat MPR / DPR / DPD dan DPRD Terkait Dengan Impeachment Presiden dan/ atau Wakil Presiden. UII, 23, 1–23.
Jumadi. (2012). Pemakzulan Presiden dan atau Wakil Presiden dalam Masa Jabatannya di Mahkamah Konstusi. Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 1(1), 105–119. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/al_daulah/article/view/1465
Ni’mah, M. D. (2012). Analisis Yuridis Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Sejarah Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(15). https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v8i15.262
Saleh, M. (2016). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Atas Pendapat Dpr Ri Mengenai Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 1, 1–23.
Santika, I. G. N. (2019). Presidensialisme Dan Problematika Mekanisme Impeachment Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Berdasarkan UUD 1945 Pasca Perubahan (Perspektif Pergulatan Hukum Dan Politik). Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 5(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v5i1.18777
Ulum, M. B. (2016). Mekanisme Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden Menurut UUd 1945 (Antara Realitas Politik dan Penegakan Konstitusi). Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(4), 131. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk747




















