Asimetri Syarat Domisili Instrumen Bukti Waris dalam Pendaftaran Tanah: Telaah Yuridis-Maslahat Asymmetry of Domicile Requirements for Inheritance Evidence Instruments in Land Registration: A Juridical-Maslahat Review
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
4100-4115
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11700
Viewed: 36 times
Downloaded: 23 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:Dita Ananda Kasih1*
Copyright :Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although the domicile clause in Article 111 paragraph (1) letter c number 5 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency Number 16 of 2021 has been widely discussed, previous studies have tended to understand it as a stand-alone vertical conflict between the ministerial regulation and the Notary Office Law, thereby failing to reveal the asymmetry among the six instruments of inheritance evidence regulated in the same article. This study aimed to analyze this internal asymmetry and examine it based on the principles governing the substance of legislation and the doctrine of maslahah. This study employed a prescriptively oriented normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The units of analysis comprised six instruments of inheritance evidence, four regulatory instruments, and Supreme Court Decision Number 29/P/HUM/2022, which were purposively selected. Legal materials were collected through document study and analyzed using a normative comparison matrix and systematic, grammatical, and teleological interpretations. The results showed that only two of the six instruments of inheritance evidence contained territorial restrictions with different characteristics, namely a restriction inherent in the office in the first instrument and a restriction imposed externally in the second instrument. Notaries, as functional public officials with a territorial jurisdiction covering one province, are restricted to the regency or city of the decedent’s domicile, whereas Balai Harta Peninggalan, which has only five offices with jurisdictions spanning multiple provinces, is not subject to a similar restriction. This asymmetry burdens heirs without producing commensurate benefits and fails to satisfy the principle of effectiveness and the criterion of maslahah. This study introduces the concept of intra-article normative asymmetry as an analytical framework for assessing regulatory imbalances within a single article and recommends reformulating the domicile clause based on the notary’s territorial jurisdiction to establish more consistent, effective, and equitable regulation of inheritance evidence.
Citation Metrics:
Downloads
Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles
-
Jafree A.I. (2026)Translation and Linguistic Analysis of The North Wind and the Sun in Standard Malay: An Instrument for Malaysian Speech ResearchGema Online Journal of Language Studies, 26(2), 383-403
-
Haryana N.R. (2026)Impact of the GENIUS Program on Students’ Nutrition Knowledge: Evidence from Binjai City, 2023Amerta Nutrition, 10(1), 148-155
-
Yusuf T.A. (2026)ANALYSIS OF ASYMMETRICAL ROCK-PAPER-SCISSORS (RPS) COMPETITION MODEL IN HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTSJournal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 22(S1), 105-128
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Alfathania, R., & Gozali, D. S. (2025). Signing of deeds carried outside the area of the notary’s office. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 6(3), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.457
Andreasari, L. D. (2022). Konflik Norma Kewenangan Pembuatan Akta yang Berkaitan dengan Pertanahan. Warkat, 2(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.21776/warkat.v2n1.2
Anita, A. A., & Widodo, M. F. S. (2023). Urgensi Penggunaan Surat Keterangan Waris dalam Peralihan Hak sebagai Upaya Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum Ahli Waris. Mahakim: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 7(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v7i2.245
Busroh, F. F., Khairo, F., & Zhafirah, P. D. (2024). Harmonisasi Regulasi di Indonesia: Simplikasi dan Sinkronisasi untuk Peningkatan Efektivitas Hukum. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 5(1), 699–711. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.5.1.7997.699-711
Chandranegara, I. S. (2020). Bentuk-Bentuk Perampingan dan Harmonisasi Regulasi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 26(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art1
Christiantirta, T. A., & Priyono, E. A. (2022). Kewenangan Notaris dalam Pembuatan Surat Tanda Bukti sebagai Ahli Waris. Notaire, 5(3), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v5i3.38800
Hadi, S. (2024). The influence of Theorie von Stufenbau der Rechtsordnung in the Indonesian legal system. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v20i2.10989
Juliantika, M. (2023). Kewenangan Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Keterangan Waris bagi Para Pihak yang Berdomisili di Luar Tempat Kedudukan Notaris. Officium Notarium, 3(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol3.iss1.art4
Kelsen, H. (1945). General theory of law and state. Harvard University Press.
Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Peraturan Menteri Negara Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/209808/permen-agrariakepala-bpn-no-16-tahun-2021
Kurniawan, B., & Purbosari, N. R. (2022). The harmonization of ministerial regulations and non-ministry government institution regulations in perspective national legal system. Proceeding of International Annual Conference on Islamic Economy and Law, 1(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.21107/aciel.v1i1.79
M. Yasin al Arif. (2023). Implementation of ministerial regulations based on attribution power in the administration of government. Mulawarman Law Review, 8(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v8i1.1074
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2022). Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 29/P/HUM/2022.
Marbun, S. (2021). Mencari Bentuk Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pemberian Hak atas Tanah dan Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah. Jurnal Pertanahan, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.53686/jp.v10i2.13
Paonganan, R. T., Maramis, R. A., & Pinasang, D. R. (2025). Analisis Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Mengatasi Konflik Regulasi di Indonesia. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(4), 4796–4812. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i4.20799
Redhawati, D., & Faniyah, I. (2025). Registration of transfer of land ownership due to inheritance in order to ensure legal certainty. Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice, 2(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.60034/8786zs18
Republik Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek).
Republik Indonesia. (1997). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/56273/pp-no-24-tahun-1997
Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39188/uu-no-12-tahun-2011
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38565/uu-no-2-tahun-2014
Rizky, F. M., & Aminah, A. (2023). Akibat Hukum terhadap Notaris yang Membuat Akta di Luar Wilayah Jabatan Notaris Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2513
Simarmata, Y. S., & Wiryomartani, W. (2021). Implementasi Pasal 111 Ayat (1) Huruf C Angka 5 Permen ATR/KBPN RI Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 terhadap Kewenangan Notaris Membuat Akta Keterangan Waris. The Juris, 5(2), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v5i2.316
Syahlan. (2021). Effective and efficient synchronization in harmonization of regulations Indonesia. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 1(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v1i1.7
Tonggiroh, J. P. (2023). Peran Notaris dalam Pembuatan Surat Keterangan Waris Terkait Penggolongan Penduduk di Indonesia. Officium Notarium, 2(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss1.art11
Trisnanda, C. D., & Adjie, H. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewarisan Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (JUPENDIS), 2(2), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.54066/jupendis.v2i2.1658