Crossmark

Main Article Content


Abstract

Although the concepts of ‘ām and khāṣ expressions have been widely discussed in the literature on Ushul Fiqh, studies comprehensively analyzing their implications for the process of Islamic legal determination remain relatively limited. This study aimed to analyze the concepts of ‘ām and khāṣ expressions, the forms of their use in the texts of the Qur’an and Hadith, and their implications for the process of Islamic legal istinbāṭ. The study employed a qualitative approach using library research. Data were obtained through a documentation study of Ushul Fiqh texts, Qur’anic exegesis texts, books, and relevant scholarly journal articles and were subsequently analyzed using descriptive-analytical and content analysis methods. The findings showed that ‘ām expressions contain a general scope of legal application, whereas khāṣ expressions restrict the applicability of a law to certain objects, individuals, or conditions. The mechanism of takhṣīṣ serves to restrict the generality of an expression, thereby producing a more precise and proportional legal interpretation that is aligned with the objectives of Sharia. Understanding the relationship among ‘ām, khāṣ, and takhṣīṣ expressions also has important implications for the consistency and accuracy of the process of Islamic legal istinbāṭ. This study concludes that mastery of linguistic principles concerning general and specific expressions is an essential element in determining Islamic law methodologically. These findings contribute to the development of Ushul Fiqh studies, particularly by strengthening the methodology of Islamic legal determination based on linguistic analysis of Sharia sources.


Keywords: Ushul Fiqh; ‘Ām Expressions; Khāṣ Expressions; Takhṣīṣ; Legal Istinbāṭ

Keywords:
Download Full-Text PDF Direct PDF file • 11261.pdf

Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Irawati R. (2027)
    Enhancing accounting students’ writing performance through problem-based learning: Evidence from a vocational higher education context
    Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 9(1)
  2. Herzig T.F. (2027)
    Psychological safety as a driver of student learning outcomes in team-based learning environments: The mediating role of teamwork quality
    International Journal of Management Education, 25(1)
  3. Khasanah A.N. (2027)
    Self-Health Literacy Among Students in Islamic School Science Education: A Comparative Analysis Across Gender, Grade Level, and School Context
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 93-106

Article Details

How to Cite
Musliadi, Syatar, A., & Fatmawati. (2026). Kajian Lafaz 'Ām dan Khāṣ dalam Ushul Fikih serta Implikasinya terhadap Penetapan Hukum Islam. AHKAM, 5(3), 3549-3561. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.11261

References

Ahmad, U. S., Syahnan, M., Khoiri, N., & Tanjung, D. (2025). Reconstruction of the function of takhsis in ushul fiqh in contemporary Muslim society. Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies, 4(2), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v4i2.1672

Al Fikri, A. H., Hadi, S., & Nurhayat, M. A. (2025). Pemahaman Teks Keagamaan: Konsep ‘Amm dan Khash dalam Interpretasi Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Teologi Islam, 1(2), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.63822/vj3rsv34

Bakar, A. A., & Sahman, S. (2024). The renewing of usul al-fiqh: Challenges, limitations and future directions. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Economic Law, 1(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijoel.v1i2.5334

Cahyani, M., Yusuf, K. M., & Alwizar. (2025). Kaedah Tafsir ‘Am dan Takhsis dalam Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 23(3), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.36835/jipi.v23i1A.169

Fathoni, M. (2016). ‘Amm dan Khass: Pengaruhnya dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 4(2), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.21274/kontem.2016.4.2.337-362

Hardani, Fatmawati, & Amin, A. R. M. (2026). Analisis Penunjukan Makna dalam Ushul Fiqh: Telaah atas Lafaz Amm dan Khash Beserta Aplikasi Nash dan Implikasi Hukumnya. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 4(1), 1081–1087. https://ojs.daarulhuda.or.id/index.php/MHI/article/view/2981

Khallaf, A. W. (1956). ‘Ilm Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Maktabah al-Da’wah al-Islamiyyah.

Melani, S., & Setiawan, W. (2026). Kaidah ‘Am dan Khas dalam Al-Qur’an Menurut Imam Jalaluddin As-Suyuthi. Az-Zaida, 2(2), 16–28.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press. https://eprints.unram.ac.id/20305

Nafi, M., Ulayya, M. S., Budiman, M. A., Ali, M. S., & Alsayd, A. (2025). Ushûl Fikih: Karya Masterpiece Prof. Dr. Muhammad Abu Zahrah (1898–1974): Kandungan Isi Kitab secara Garis Besar. INTEGRASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.61590/int.v3i01.187

Rajafi, A. (2023). The contemporary ushul fiqh in Indonesia: An idea and practice. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 21(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v21i1.2260

Ramli. (2021). Ushul Fiqh (Edisi ke-1). Nuta Media.

Siradjuddin, A. (2025). Ushul Fikih.

Sodiqin, A. (2012). Fiqh dan Ushul Fiqh: Sejarah, Metodologi dan Implementasinya di Indonesia. Beranda Publishing. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/27451

Suhri, M. A. K. (2020). Metodologi Bayani sebagai Istinbat Hukum: Pandangan Abdul Khallaf. At-Turost: Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.52491/at.v7i1.20

Yunis, N. F., Nurfadhilah, & Agustiar. (2025). Kaidah Al-‘Ām dan Al-Khāṣ dalam Kajian Al-Qur’an. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(6). https://doi.org/10.62281/v3i6.2442