Kedudukan Gugatan Rekonvensi dalam Cerai Talak dan Cerai Gugat di Peradilan Agama The Position of Counterclaims in Cerai Talak and Cerai Gugat in Religious Courts
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2903-2923
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10799
Viewed: 0 times
Downloaded: 0 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Maria Rosalina1*, Shafira Putri Azhari2, Najwa Tindaon3, Chairunnisa Chairunnisa4 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although counterclaims have been recognized as a defendant’s formal right in civil procedural law, their position in divorce by repudiation and contested divorce cases within the Religious Courts still faces inconsistent practice, particularly due to a normative gap in the Compilation of Islamic Law. This study aims to examine the position of counterclaims in divorce by repudiation and contested divorce cases and to analyze their effectiveness as an instrument for protecting the rights of the parties. This study uses a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials were analyzed descriptively and analytically to examine the regulation of counterclaims under the HIR and RBg and their relevance in the practice of resolving divorce cases in the Religious Courts. The results of the study show that counterclaims have an important position as a means of protecting the defendant’s rights as well as an instrument of procedural efficiency through the concept of one-stop litigation. However, their effectiveness is still hindered by normative uncertainty regarding post-divorce rights and weaknesses in the enforcement of judgments. Supreme Court Circular Number 3 of 2018, through the judge’s ex officio authority, constitutes a legal breakthrough in protecting women’s rights, but it cannot replace the active role of counterclaims as an instrument for asserting the rights of the parties. The conclusion of the study affirms that counterclaims need to be positioned as a strategic legal mechanism in resolving divorce cases in the Religious Courts. The implications of this study indicate the need for regulatory synchronization and the preparation of more comprehensive operational guidelines to ensure legal certainty, judicial efficiency, and substantive justice for the litigating parties.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Abidin, F. R. M., & Taupiqqurrahman. (2024). Menggagas Model Penerapan Prorogasi dalam Pemenuhan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Berbiaya Ringan. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(3), 1552–1570. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i3.10473
Ahyat, M., & Andaryuni, L. (2026). Penetapan Nafkah Iddah dan Mut’ah dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama: Analisis Kesetaraan Gender dan Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Tana Mana, 7(1), 1–10. https://ojs.staialfurqan.ac.id/jtm/article/view/1499
Alfiyahwati. (2023). Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Mantan Istri. Asy-Syari’ah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(1), 1–18. https://ejournal.unzah.ac.id/index.php/assyariah/article/view/855
Basri, R. (2019). Fiqh Munakahat: 4 Mahzab dan Kebijakan Pemerintah. CV. Kaaffah Learning Center. https://repository.iainpare.ac.id/id/eprint/2777/
Fanggi, L., & Wahyuliana, I. (2026). Implementasi Pasal 156 Huruf (C) Kompilasi Hukum Islam dalam Pengalihan Hak Asuh Anak: Studi Praktik Kasus Perceraian di Peradilan Agama Bangkalan. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 4(1), 1–16. https://jurnal.mediaakademik.com/index.php/jma/article/view/4712
Fitri, W., Rini, R., Angel, V., & Putri, E. E. (2023). Relevansi dan Aktualisasi: Penerapan Hukum Acara dalam Penyelesaian Talak Raj’i di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(3), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v2i3.1927
Hasibuan, P. T. M. (2022). Menakar Efektivitas Gugatan Balik Harta Bersama dalam Perkara Konvensi Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Al-Maqasid: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan, 8(2), 118–132. https://jurnal.uinsyahada.ac.id/index.php/almaqasid/article/view/6136
Helmi, M. (2014). Penerapan Asas Persidangan Gugatan Rekonvensi Perkara Perceraian dengan Harta Bersama. Ittihad, 12(21), 44–55. https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/ittihad/article/view/1672
Heniyatun, H., Sulistyaningsih, P., & Anisah, S. (2020). Pemberian Mut’ah dan Nafkah Iddah dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v21i1.11647
Ibrahim, J. (2020). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Iksan, & Adnan. (2020). Gugatan Konvensi dan Rekonvensi dalam Bingkai Syariat Islam (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 603/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Bm.). Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 9(2), 102–124. https://ejurnal.umbima.ac.id/index.php/jurnalhukum/article/view/21
Iman, R. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. PT Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Irwansyah, W., Maulina, N., Wiranti, W., Hidayat, R., & Irwan, I. (2025). Analisis Hukum Islam terhadap Ketentuan Nafkah Mut’ah pada Perkara Cerai Gugat dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Ulumuddin: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 15(2), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.47200/ulumuddin.v15i2.2915
Iskandar, M., & Agustina, L. (2019). Penerapan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan dalam Kumulasi Cerai Gugat dan Harta Bersama di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 3(1), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v3i1.4403
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.
Muzammil, I. (2019). Fiqh Munakahat: Hukum Pernikahan dalam Islam. Tira Smart. https://repository.uinsa.ac.id/id/eprint/1057/
Prapaskah, T., & Wiraguna, S. A. (2026). Kajian Filosofis-Yuridis terhadap Konsep Pembuktian Sederhana (Simple Bewijs) dalam Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Agama. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 6(1), 17–22. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jkih/article/view/756
Purwati, A. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Teori dan Praktek. Jakad Media Publishing.
Rachmainy, L., & Rahmawati, E. (2017). Penerapan Rekonvensi sebagai Hak Istimewa Tergugat dalam Perkara Perceraian (Talak) di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 2(2), 299–315. https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/jurnalilmiahhukumdejure/article/view/1306
Rahman, M. A., & Lubis, F. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak atas Nafkah ’Iddah Istri yang Mengajukan Cerai Gugat Perspektif SEMA Nomor 3 Tahun 2018. Kabilah: Journal of Social Community, 8(1), 935–945. https://ejournal.iainata.ac.id/kabilah/article/view/256
Rahmawati, T. (2021). Fiqh Munakahat 1. Duta Media Publishing.
Saragih, T. F. R., Pulungan, S., & Budhiawan, A. (2022). Hukum Nafkah Mut’ah dan Idah Istri dalam Perkara Khuluk (Analisis terhadap SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2018 tentang Pemberian Nafkah Idah dan Mut’ah pada Perkara Cerai Gugat). Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 10(1), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v10i01.2443
Sari, N. P., Waid, A., & Nurseha, M. A. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim Putusan No. 1055/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Kbm dalam Penolakan Gugatan Rekonvensi. KAWRUH: Jurnal Kajian Syariah, Ushuluddin, dan Dakwah, 2(1), 73–86. https://ejournal.iainu-kebumen.ac.id/index.php/KAWRUH/en/article/view/1818
Siregar, M. Y. (2022). Hak Mut’ah dan Nafkah Iddah dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat). Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 10(2), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v10i2.2709
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers. https://rajagrafindo.co.id/produk/penelitian-hukum-normatif/
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Yusuf, M. F. D. (2025). Analisis Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif Indonesia: Dinamika Nafkah Iddah dan Mut’ah Pasca Gugatan Cerai di Pengadilan Agama (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 251/Pdt.G/2020/PA.UTJ). Jotika Research in Business Law, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.56445/jrbl.v4i1.169