E-Court dan Akses Keadilan Digital: Kajian Sosiologi Hukum terhadap Perubahan Pelayanan Peradilan E-Court and Digital Access to Justice: A Sociology of Law Study of Changes in Judicial Services

Crossmark

Article Sidebar

Page Numbers: 2379-2394
Download PDF
Published: Jun 2, 2026
Digital Object Identifier: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10393
Save this to:
Save to Mendeley Download RIS

Article Metrics:
Viewed: 95 times
Downloaded: 60 times
Article can trace at:

Author Fee:
Free Publication Fees for Foreign Researchers (USD 0.00)
Check for article on SINTA:

LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers

Connected Papers:
Connected Papers


Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.


Authors:
Mariatul Kiptiah1*, Fachruji Fachruji2, Muhammad Aini3
Copyright :

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.

Explore Our Journals
Find the journal that best fits your research. If this journal does not match your manuscript’s scope, explore our portfolio below to select a more suitable publication venue.

Main Article Content

Mariatul Kiptiah
Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari
Fachruji Fachruji
Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari
Muhammad Aini
Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Abstract

Although digital transformation in the judicial system has been widely studied, research that specifically discusses the implementation of E-Court from the perspective of the sociology of law and its implications for access to digital justice remains limited. This study aims to analyze the implementation of E-Court and its influence on access to digital justice, the transformation of legal culture, and patterns of social interaction in judicial services in Indonesia. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study design involving judges, court clerks, advocates, and members of the public who use E-Court services. Informants were selected through purposive sampling based on their direct involvement in the use of electronic judicial services. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation, then analyzed using the interactive analysis model of Miles and Huberman, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results show that the implementation of E-Court has transformed the judicial service system through improved administrative efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of court services. However, digital inequality, low technological literacy, and limited infrastructure remain major obstacles to equitable access to digital justice. In addition, the shift from conventional judicial services to a digital system has also affected patterns of social interaction and the legal culture of justice seekers. These findings contribute to the development of studies in the sociology of law, particularly regarding the relationship between law, technology, and social change in the digital era. The conclusion of the study affirms that the implementation of E-Court serves not only as an administrative innovation but also as an instrument for transforming legal culture and expanding access to digital justice. The implications of this study provide practical contributions for the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and relevant stakeholders in strengthening digital literacy, technological infrastructure, and judicial policies that are more inclusive and responsive to public needs.

Keywords:
Share Article:

Citation Metrics:

Scopus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citation Metrics & Similar Scopus Articles

Data source Crossref
0
citations
Citation counts are source-specific and may differ because database coverage, reference matching, and update schedules are different. Counts are not added together. Crossref values represent citation links registered and matched by Crossref.
Check Secondary Documents in Scopus
Open this article in Scopus, then check the Secondary documents tab. Use Manual Citation Fallback only for counts you have verified manually.
Open in Scopus
Similar Scopus Articles
Scopus
  1. Artina F. (2027)
    Digital Literacy through a Web-Based Application: Addressing Polarization and Promoting Social Integration among Islamic Senior High School Students
    Asean Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 6(1), 51-66
  2. Rupacz S. (2027)
    Smart Governance for Better Living: Empirical Analysis of Public Services and Digital Transformation Impact on Urban Quality of Live
    IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 790 IFIPAICT, 431-450
  3. Esan O. (2027)
    Digital Transformation Framework for Sustainable Water-Energy-Food Nexus in South Africa
    IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 790 IFIPAICT, 274-291

Article Details

How to Cite
Kiptiah, M., Fachruji, F., & Aini, M. (2026). E-Court dan Akses Keadilan Digital: Kajian Sosiologi Hukum terhadap Perubahan Pelayanan Peradilan. AHKAM, 5(3), 2379-2394. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10393

Creative Commons License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

References

Arifin, M. (2020). Transparansi Pelayanan Publik Melalui Implementasi E-Court di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(3), 421–438.

Bar-Sinai, M., Tadjer, M., & Vilozni, M. (2019). Computer assisted access to justice via formal jurisprudence modeling. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.13518

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Delfina, D. (2025). Efisiensi Penanganan Perkara Perdata Melalui Implementasi Sistem E-Court di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Politik dan Sosial, 6(3), 424–431. https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v6i3.322

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Harefa, N., Sitohang, B. S., & Sinaga, M. (2026). Analisis Dampak Digitalisasi Peradilan Terhadap Akses Keadilan dan Prinsip Peradilan yang Adil bagi Pencari Keadilan. Jurnal Hukum Justice, 3(2). https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/JHJ/article/view/6224

Lestari, D., & Huda, M. (2021). Digitalisasi Peradilan dan Efektivitas Pelayanan Hukum Berbasis Elektronik. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 377–392.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Lutfia, V. (2022). Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Peradilan Melalui E-Court dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan bagi Masyarakat di Era Digitalisasi. Lex Renaissance, 6(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss4.art3

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2023). Laporan tahunan 2023. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/publikasi/laporan-tahunan/2335-laporan-tahunan-ma-2023

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2001). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law (2nd ed.). Transaction Publishers.

Nugraha, R. (2021). Kemandirian Masyarakat dalam Penggunaan Layanan E-Court di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Al-Ahkam, 31(2), 201–218.

Panggabean, S. N. (2021). Reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities in electronics justice system (E-Court). Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.1.2021.1-30

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pitaloka, D. (2025). E-Court: A digital disruption in law enforcement and its impact on judicial efficiency in Indonesia. Ex Aequo Et Bono Journal of Law, 2(2), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.61511/eaebjol.v2i2.2025.1404

Pratama, R., & Disemadi, H. S. (2022). Tantangan Digitalisasi Peradilan Melalui Sistem E-Court di Indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 11(1), 87–102.

Putra, D. (2020). A modern judicial system in Indonesia: Legal breakthrough of E-Court and E-Legal Proceeding. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.275-297

Rahman, F. (2023). Akses Keadilan Digital dalam Implementasi Peradilan Elektronik di Indonesia. Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, 12(1), 55–70.

Sari, D., & Nugroho, A. (2022). Problematika Hukum dan Keamanan Data dalam Implementasi E-Court di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3), 233–248.

Sembiring, T., & Putri, N. (2022). Modernisasi Pelayanan Pengadilan Melalui Sistem E-Court di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1), 45–61.

Setiawan, A. D., Artaji, & Putri, S. A. (2021). Implementasi Sistem E-Court dalam Penegakan Hukum di Pengadilan Negeri. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 2(2), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v2i2.352

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Susanto, R. (2024). Digital Divide dan Akses Keadilan dalam Implementasi E-Court di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosio-Legal, 8(1), 41–58.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press.

Wijaya, A. (2022). Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Sistem Peradilan Elektronik di Indonesia. Jurnal Socio-Legal Studies, 6(2), 119–134.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yoesuf, J. P., Ramadhansyah, F., Elviyanti, S., & Salamah, A. (2023). Strengthening the implementation of E-Court-based judiciary as a legal protection in the implementation of E-Litigation-based trials. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 12(2), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.293-318