Analisis Pemikiran Imam Syafi’i dan Imam Ibnu Hazm terhadap Cacat sebagai Alasan Perceraian Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah Analysis of the Thoughts of Imam Syafi’i and Imam Ibnu Hazm on Defects as Grounds for Divorce from the Perspective of Maslahah Mursalah
Article Sidebar
Page Numbers:
2144-2165
Digital Object Identifier:
10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10279
Viewed: 51 times
Downloaded: 31 times
LYAS Publisher cordially invites qualified professionals to serve as Editors or Reviewers. Your expertise will make an important contribution to maintaining and strengthening the academic quality of our publications. Interested applicants are kindly requested to complete the application form at the following link: Editors & Reviewers
Please feel free to contact us if you need any further information about the submission process or if you have any additional questions.
Authors:
Amelia Rahman1*, Arsal Arsal2 
Copyright :
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Although defects as grounds for divorce in Islamic law have received attention in various previous studies, research that specifically compares the thought of Imam Syafi’i and Imam Ibnu Hazm from the perspective of maslahah mursalah remains limited. This study aims to analyze the views of Imam Syafi’i and Imam Ibnu Hazm regarding defects as grounds for divorce and their relevance from the perspective of maslahah mursalah. This study used a qualitative approach with a library research design. The data sources consisted of primary sources, namely al-Umm by Imam Syafi’i and al-Muhalla by Imam Ibnu Hazm, as well as secondary sources in the form of books, journals, scientific articles, and other documents relevant to the research theme. Data were collected through documentation and literature study techniques and were then analyzed using inductive, deductive, and comparative methods. The results showed that Imam Syafi’i permitted certain defects to be used as grounds for divorce if such defects obstructed the objectives of marriage and caused harm to the spouse. Conversely, Imam Ibnu Hazm argued that defects could not be used as grounds for divorce because there was no scriptural text that explicitly allowed the annulment of marriage due to defects. This difference in views was influenced by the legal istinbāṭ methods used by the two figures; Imam Syafi’i referred to the Qur’an, Sunnah, ijma’, and qiyas, whereas Imam Ibnu Hazm was more oriented toward a textualist approach to scriptural texts. The conclusion of this study affirms the importance of considering public benefit in understanding the dynamics of contemporary Islamic family law, particularly in relation to divorce due to defects. These findings provide a theoretical contribution to the development of Islamic family law studies by clarifying the relationship between maslahah mursalah, maqasid al-syari’ah, and divorce due to defects.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
Aini, N., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Perceraian Akibat Gangguan Kesehatan dan Ketidakmampuan Menjalankan Kewajiban Rumah Tangga dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 8(2), 112–126.
Anita. (2011). Hukum Memfasakh Nikah Karena Cacat Menurut Ibnu Hazm dalam Kitab Al-Muhalla [Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau]. http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/id/eprint/773
Aqmal. (2012). Fasakh Nikah Menurut Imam Asy-Syafi’i Relevansinya dengan Kompilasi Hukum Islam [Skripsi, UIN Alauddin Makassar].
Arikunto, S. (2021). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi revisi). Rineka Cipta.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Djawas, M., Amrullah, A., & Adenan, F. B. (2019). Fasakh Nikah dalam Teori Maṣlaḥah Imām Al-Ghazālī. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 2(1), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v2i1.7645
Hasanah, U., & Ridwan, A. (2022). Faktor Kesehatan dan Psikologis Sebagai Penyebab Perceraian dalam Keluarga Muslim Kontemporer. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 15(1), 55–70.
Hazm, I. (2003). Al-Muhalla bil Atsar (Vol. 9). Dar al-Fikr.
Kamali, M. H. (2019). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence (3rd ed.). Islamic Texts Society.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2011). Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Munawir, A. (2021). Perceraian dalam Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syari’ah dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer. Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Islam, 13(2), 88–102.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. (1975). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/67916/pp-no-9-tahun-1975
Rahman, A. (2022). Perceraian dan Kemaslahatan Keluarga dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara, 7(1), 33–47.
Shafi’i, M. I. (2001). Al-Umm (Vol. 5). Dar al-Wafa’.
Siregar, R. (2020). Maqasid Al-Syari’ah dalam Penyelesaian Perceraian Keluarga Muslim. Jurnal Al-Ahkam, 10(2), 77–91.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Wahyuni, S. (2021). Kesehatan Mental dan Disharmoni Rumah Tangga Sebagai Faktor Perceraian di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Keluarga Islam, 6(1), 41–56.
Zed, M. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Zuhaili, W. (2018). Ushul Al-Fiqh Al-Islami (Vol. 2). Dar al-Fikr.